28.02.2015 Views

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Purchasing power parity <strong>and</strong> the PPP puzzle 45<br />

However,<strong>and</strong> as we shall see in more detail later,estimated half-lives are much<br />

higher than 1 year. For example,for the post-Bretton Woods period when<br />

currencies are examined on an individual basis, ρ turns out to be statistically<br />

indistinguishable from unity. However,when data from prior to the post-Bretton<br />

Woods regime,or when panel data are used for the post-Bretton Woods,there is<br />

clear evidence of statistically significant mean reversion <strong>and</strong> the half-life falls within<br />

the range of 3 to 5 years (see MacDonald 1995a; Rogoff 1996). Rogoff (1996) has<br />

labelled such mean reversion speeds,combined with the large volatility of real<br />

exchange rates as the PPP puzzle:<br />

How can one reconcile the enormous short-term volatility of real exchange<br />

rates with the extremely slow rate at which shocks appear to damp out? Most<br />

explanations of short-term exchange rate volatility point to financial factors<br />

such as changes in portfolio preferences,short-term asset price bubbles <strong>and</strong><br />

monetary shocks. Such shocks can have substantial effects on the real economy<br />

in the presence of sticky nominal prices. Consensus estimates for the rate at<br />

which PPP deviations damp,however,suggest a half-life of three to five years,<br />

seemingly far too long to be explained by nominal rigidities. It is not difficult<br />

to rationalize slow adjustment of real shocks if real shocks – shocks to tastes<br />

<strong>and</strong> technology – are predominant. But existing models based on real shocks<br />

cannot account for short-terms exchange-rate volatility.<br />

(Rogoff 1996: 647–8)<br />

As we shall see,one useful way of trying to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> explain the PPP<br />

puzzle is to decompose the overall (CPI-based) real exchange rate into two relative<br />

price components,an internal <strong>and</strong> external component. To do this,we introduce<br />

non-traded prices into our previous set-up in the following way. Assume that the<br />

overall price level, p,is made up of a price level for traded goods,which,in turn,<br />

is the sum of the n traded goods produced in the home <strong>and</strong> foreign country,<strong>and</strong><br />

the price level for non-traded goods,which is the sum of the m non-traded goods<br />

produced:<br />

p t = β t p T t<br />

+ (1 − β t )p NT<br />

t , 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!