28.02.2015 Views

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 Introduction<br />

or<br />

F (1 + i)<br />

=<br />

S (1 + i ∗ ) ,(1.10)<br />

which is the condition of covered interest parity. Hence if (1.10) holds there will<br />

be no incentive for funds to move from the home to the foreign country since<br />

the interest differential in favour of the foreign country is offset by the forward<br />

premium. Expression (1.10) may be simplified by taking natural logarithms of the<br />

terms on the left <strong>and</strong> right h<strong>and</strong> sides,that is,<br />

i − i ∗ = f − s,(1.11)<br />

<strong>and</strong> i <strong>and</strong> i ∗ are approximately equal to ln(1 + i) <strong>and</strong> ln(1 + i ∗ ),respectively,<strong>and</strong><br />

f − s is the forward premium. Thus,if i ∗ > i it is clear from (1.11) that must be less<br />

than s; the forward value of the home currency is at a premium <strong>and</strong> the forward<br />

value of the foreign currency is at a discount. It is expected that arbitrage will ensure<br />

that equation (1.10/1.11) holds continuously. Thus any slight interest differential<br />

in favour of the foreign country will lead to a large quantity of arbitrage funds<br />

moving to the foreign country <strong>and</strong> in doing so will force the forward rate to give a<br />

premium on the pound which just offsets the interest differential.<br />

The covered interest parity condition may alternatively be written:<br />

CD = i − i ∗ − f − s = 0,(1.12)<br />

where CD is the covered interest differential which indicates that covered arbitrage<br />

will only be profitable if the CD is non-zero. In such a case,of course,there would<br />

be a riskless profit to be made from covered interest arbitrage.<br />

Consider now the use made by commercial traders of the forward exchange market.<br />

In our discussion of the balance of payments model it was implicitly assumed<br />

that importers <strong>and</strong> exporters pay for goods <strong>and</strong> services immediately. But usually<br />

there are lags between the delivery of goods <strong>and</strong> their actual payment,<strong>and</strong><br />

under a flexible exchange rate system exporters <strong>and</strong> importers may wish to guard<br />

against the risk of exchange rate changes during this period by hedging in the<br />

foreign exchange market. For example,an importer may take delivery today of<br />

goods which require payment in 3 months. To avoid the exchange risk inherent<br />

in such a transaction,the importer will use the forward exchange market to sell<br />

domestic currency for foreign currency in 3 months at a price agreed now. Since<br />

the importer holds a foreign currency asset (the foreign currency due in 3 months)<br />

<strong>and</strong> an equal offsetting foreign currency liability,his position is,as in the case of<br />

arbitrage,classified as being closed.<br />

In contrast to arbitrageurs <strong>and</strong> hedgers,speculators deliberately accept a net<br />

open position in foreign exchange. Speculation may occur in both the spot <strong>and</strong><br />

the forward markets,although ‘pure’ speculation is regarded as being confined<br />

to the forward market because little or no funds are required. 9 For the moment<br />

we concentrate on pure speculation. If the speculator expects that the future spot

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!