28.02.2015 Views

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

288 The new open economy macroeconomics part 2<br />

Ghironi et al. (2003) test a two-country variant of the NOEM model in which<br />

cross-country differences in net foreign asset <strong>and</strong> consumption dynamics are driven<br />

by differences in discount factors <strong>and</strong> steady-state levels of productivity. Their simulation<br />

results show that even small <strong>and</strong> empirically plausible differences in discount<br />

factors can impart considerable heterogeneity into net foreign asset positions,<strong>and</strong><br />

system dynamics,following productivity shocks. In the empirical implementation<br />

of their model,Ghironi et al. focus on the G3 – Germany,Japan <strong>and</strong> the US –<br />

against the aggregate of the G7 (excluding the home country). A VAR-based<br />

approach is used,for a sample period spanning 1977,quarter 1 to 1997,quarter 4,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the key variables included are labour productivity,per capita consumption <strong>and</strong><br />

net foreign assets. St<strong>and</strong>ard identification methods are used to identify countryspecific<br />

<strong>and</strong> global productivity shocks. Ghironi et al.’s empirical results show that<br />

the dynamic responses of net foreign assets <strong>and</strong> consumption vary considerably<br />

across the G3 <strong>and</strong> they also argue that the empirical response of the US data are<br />

consistent with those of the less patient more productive economy.<br />

Perhaps the most direct test of the NOEM class of models has been provided by<br />

Bergin (2004) who estimates,using maximum likelihood methods,a two-country<br />

version of the NOEM. The two ‘countries’ are the US against an aggregate of<br />

the rest of the G7 <strong>and</strong> the variables entering the model are the exchange rate,<br />

the current account,output growth,inflation <strong>and</strong> interest rate deviations; data<br />

are quarterly over the period 1973:1 to 2000:4. Bergin demonstrates that the onestep-ahead<br />

in-sample predictions for the exchange rate <strong>and</strong> the current account<br />

are able to beat a r<strong>and</strong>om walk,although they are not able to beat the predictions<br />

from a st<strong>and</strong>ard VAR model. The estimated parameter estimates from the model<br />

help to shed some light on some of the issues that have arisen in the NOEM class of<br />

models. For example,Bergin finds that a very high degree of local currency pricing<br />

(see Section 11.2) is needed to explain the actual exchange rate movements in the<br />

data set. Bergin also demonstrates that the elasticity of substitution between home<br />

<strong>and</strong> foreign goods is close to unity,which is the value often assumed in theoretical<br />

work. Bergin also shows that deviations from UIP are very closely correlated with<br />

shocks to marginal utility rather than to monetary shocks,which is at odds with<br />

the basic story in many variants of the NOEM.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!