Financial Sector Development in Africa: Opportunities ... - World Bank
Financial Sector Development in Africa: Opportunities ... - World Bank
Financial Sector Development in Africa: Opportunities ... - World Bank
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
220 Dafe<br />
Conclusion<br />
There is strong empirical evidence that access to f<strong>in</strong>ance for private<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestment is essential for enterprise development and economic growth.<br />
<strong>F<strong>in</strong>ancial</strong> systems <strong>in</strong> Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong> have rema<strong>in</strong>ed highly exclusive,<br />
however. This exclusivity is primarily the result of market failures that<br />
make the provision of f<strong>in</strong>ancial services to lower-<strong>in</strong>come groups and<br />
SMEs prohibitively costly or, because of an uncompetitive market environment,<br />
unattractive. While market failures provide an argument for<br />
activism (def<strong>in</strong>ed as deliberate government <strong>in</strong>terventions to promote<br />
access to f<strong>in</strong>ance), experience with activism has been mixed at best.<br />
However, even though activism does not guarantee an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> broadbased<br />
productive private <strong>in</strong>vestment, past experience—both <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and the developed world—suggests that achiev<strong>in</strong>g this goal without<br />
deliberate government <strong>in</strong>terventions is difficult, if not impossible. 22 For<br />
this reason there is a renewed <strong>in</strong>terest among development practitioners<br />
<strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the conditions under which activist government <strong>in</strong>terventions<br />
<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial markets could serve as a tool to <strong>in</strong>crease access to<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ance for productive <strong>in</strong>vestments.<br />
It is now commonly acknowledged that the effectiveness of activism<br />
depends on politics, and there is a consensus that good governance is a<br />
precondition for government <strong>in</strong>terventions to be successful. This chapter<br />
argues that although the current consensus on the potential of activism<br />
is a promis<strong>in</strong>g way forward, its policy implications are not quite clear.<br />
There is no fully developed positive approach of government activism<br />
and thus no framework that helps evaluat<strong>in</strong>g, ex ante, whether a government<br />
entity is likely to successfully assume an activist role. Without such<br />
ex ante predictors, development practitioners will f<strong>in</strong>d it difficult to prioritize<br />
reform policies and def<strong>in</strong>e the adequate role for government <strong>in</strong> a<br />
particular country; this could range from a modernist to a pro-market<br />
activist role. Moreover, without such a framework there is the risk of<br />
spend<strong>in</strong>g resources on policies that seek to <strong>in</strong>crease f<strong>in</strong>ancial access but<br />
are not likely to succeed and are unsusta<strong>in</strong>able. This outcome could<br />
spread disenchantment with aid and leave <strong>Africa</strong>n countries without the<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancial services they urgently need.<br />
This chapter shows that political economy can provide a framework<br />
that helps to assess whether government <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong> a particular<br />
country have a chance to succeed. By focus<strong>in</strong>g on endogenous policy<br />
choices, political economy allows the study of any policy as the outcome<br />
of a political decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g process. Therefore political economy not<br />
only helps to predict the chances of success of an activist approach, but