03.04.2015 Views

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

57. The Fruitful Field Project<br />

at regional level over the last four<br />

years demonstrates that this is<br />

far from easy and just how quickly<br />

territorial mentalities emerge.”<br />

160 The Committee also notes<br />

the challenges of successfully<br />

establishing such a team. A<br />

submission made by a District<br />

officer during the consultation<br />

period noted “that this approach is<br />

very different to that adopted when<br />

District Development Enablers were<br />

introduced. From that experience<br />

I concur wholeheartedly with the<br />

value of coordination, however I<br />

observe that as an organisation we<br />

will need to learn many new skills<br />

if we are to become accomplished<br />

as a Connexion in working to a level<br />

of excellence in this coordinated<br />

way. We can learn much from the<br />

strengths of the regional District<br />

Development Enabler networks and<br />

from the benefits which District<br />

Development Enablers as a national<br />

group have [recently] enjoyed.”<br />

161 The posts within the team will be<br />

grouped:<br />

l<br />

l<br />

l<br />

in regional teams across<br />

the Connexion, to which we<br />

recommend allocating 70% of<br />

the team’s posts<br />

within centres (see section J<br />

below), where we recommend<br />

locating 20% of the team’s posts<br />

within a coordinating team, to<br />

which we recommend allocating<br />

10% of the team’s posts.<br />

This represents a strong and<br />

welcome bias towards dispersed,<br />

regional working. This capacity<br />

is described in more detail in<br />

paragraphs 163-179 below.<br />

162 This team of expert staff is the<br />

Network’s key resource. Valuing,<br />

developing and investing in such an<br />

expert staff team is a significant and<br />

worthwhile commitment of resources.<br />

In this respect, the Committee agrees<br />

with a consultation submission from<br />

a regional forum, which affirmed the<br />

importance of “funding well-resourced<br />

people rather than under-resourced<br />

institutions.”<br />

Regional teams<br />

163 We recommend the establishment<br />

of teams of regionally-deployed staff<br />

within the single team of expert staff.<br />

Again, this was prefigured both in the<br />

consultation document and in the<br />

Committee’s interim response. The<br />

Committee was particularly pleased<br />

in this instance to note the warm<br />

reception given to the concept by<br />

those who have experience of working<br />

closely with regionally-deployed expert<br />

staff at the moment. A submission<br />

made by a District committee during<br />

the consultation period noted that<br />

regionally deployed staff posts are<br />

“vital because they are located within<br />

reach of each church and Circuit and<br />

vital because they can form a body<br />

which can ensure the sharing of best<br />

connexional practice.” A submission<br />

from a District Chair noted the<br />

importance of “effective networking<br />

708 <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!