Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
57. The Fruitful Field Project<br />
at regional level over the last four<br />
years demonstrates that this is<br />
far from easy and just how quickly<br />
territorial mentalities emerge.”<br />
160 The Committee also notes<br />
the challenges of successfully<br />
establishing such a team. A<br />
submission made by a District<br />
officer during the consultation<br />
period noted “that this approach is<br />
very different to that adopted when<br />
District Development Enablers were<br />
introduced. From that experience<br />
I concur wholeheartedly with the<br />
value of coordination, however I<br />
observe that as an organisation we<br />
will need to learn many new skills<br />
if we are to become accomplished<br />
as a Connexion in working to a level<br />
of excellence in this coordinated<br />
way. We can learn much from the<br />
strengths of the regional District<br />
Development Enabler networks and<br />
from the benefits which District<br />
Development Enablers as a national<br />
group have [recently] enjoyed.”<br />
161 The posts within the team will be<br />
grouped:<br />
l<br />
l<br />
l<br />
in regional teams across<br />
the Connexion, to which we<br />
recommend allocating 70% of<br />
the team’s posts<br />
within centres (see section J<br />
below), where we recommend<br />
locating 20% of the team’s posts<br />
within a coordinating team, to<br />
which we recommend allocating<br />
10% of the team’s posts.<br />
This represents a strong and<br />
welcome bias towards dispersed,<br />
regional working. This capacity<br />
is described in more detail in<br />
paragraphs 163-179 below.<br />
162 This team of expert staff is the<br />
Network’s key resource. Valuing,<br />
developing and investing in such an<br />
expert staff team is a significant and<br />
worthwhile commitment of resources.<br />
In this respect, the Committee agrees<br />
with a consultation submission from<br />
a regional forum, which affirmed the<br />
importance of “funding well-resourced<br />
people rather than under-resourced<br />
institutions.”<br />
Regional teams<br />
163 We recommend the establishment<br />
of teams of regionally-deployed staff<br />
within the single team of expert staff.<br />
Again, this was prefigured both in the<br />
consultation document and in the<br />
Committee’s interim response. The<br />
Committee was particularly pleased<br />
in this instance to note the warm<br />
reception given to the concept by<br />
those who have experience of working<br />
closely with regionally-deployed expert<br />
staff at the moment. A submission<br />
made by a District committee during<br />
the consultation period noted that<br />
regionally deployed staff posts are<br />
“vital because they are located within<br />
reach of each church and Circuit and<br />
vital because they can form a body<br />
which can ensure the sharing of best<br />
connexional practice.” A submission<br />
from a District Chair noted the<br />
importance of “effective networking<br />
708 <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> 2012