03.04.2015 Views

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

59. Memorials to the <strong>Conference</strong><br />

M12 Additional responsibility allowances<br />

The Synod of the <strong>Methodist</strong> Church in<br />

Scotland (M: Present: 32. Voting: 16<br />

for, 8 against; R: Present: 83. Voting:<br />

58 for, 7 against), noting the work of<br />

the Connexional Allowances Committee<br />

reported to the <strong>Methodist</strong> Council in March<br />

2012, believes that there is no theological<br />

justification for responsibility allowances<br />

for some ministers and asks for their<br />

abolition across the Connexion.<br />

Reply<br />

The <strong>Conference</strong> thanks the Scotland Synod<br />

for expressing their concern in respect of<br />

allowances for additional responsibilities.<br />

The Connexional Allowances Committee<br />

(CAC) report, which can be found<br />

elsewhere in the <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong>,<br />

recommends that further work be done<br />

with a view to bringing proposals to the<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> of 2013 on these and related<br />

matters. The CAC will take into account<br />

these and other views expressed as it<br />

undertakes its work in the coming year.<br />

The reply to the memorial is therefore<br />

contained in the resolutions of the<br />

<strong>Conference</strong>.<br />

M13 Assessments<br />

The Salisbury (26/23) Circuit Meeting<br />

(Present: 45. Voting: unanimous) in<br />

acknowledging the current economic<br />

climate, regrets the substantial increase in<br />

connexional assessments for the coming<br />

year and requests the <strong>Conference</strong> to<br />

instruct the <strong>Methodist</strong> Council to review<br />

costs with a view to producing savings<br />

which might then be passed back to<br />

Circuits.<br />

Reply<br />

The <strong>Conference</strong> thanks the Salisbury<br />

Circuit for its engagement with the<br />

connexional assessment. The Connexional<br />

Central Services Budget reflects a number<br />

of difficult decisions regarding cost<br />

savings. Both the <strong>Methodist</strong> Council and<br />

its Strategy and Resources Committee<br />

spent considerable time debating these<br />

in the context of the current economic<br />

climate. For this reason, they agreed that<br />

a more radical review is required of the<br />

services provided centrally and the costs<br />

of doing so.<br />

The Connexional Central Services Budget<br />

report, which can be found elsewhere<br />

in the <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong>, includes a<br />

commitment for this work to be undertaken<br />

by the <strong>Methodist</strong> Council, and hence the<br />

memorial is accepted.<br />

M14 Budgeting and assessments<br />

The Lancashire District Synod (R) (Present:<br />

124. Voting: unanimous) thanks those who<br />

have worked hard to produce the budget<br />

for the <strong>Methodist</strong> Church Fund (MCF).<br />

Aware of the difficulties being faced by so<br />

many in the present state of the economy,<br />

the Lancashire District Synod therefore<br />

requests that the <strong>Conference</strong> directs those<br />

who are producing the budget for future<br />

years:<br />

a) to create an MCF budget in future<br />

years which takes as a starting<br />

point the 2012/2013 budget and<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> 2012 777

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!