Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
59. Memorials to the <strong>Conference</strong><br />
Stationing do not provide clear guidance as<br />
to the re-invitation procedure to be followed<br />
when the initial view of the Circuit Invitation<br />
Committee is to recommend an extension<br />
period that differs from that requested by<br />
the minister concerned. Clauses E12 and<br />
E13 cover the ‘clear cut’ case but not the<br />
above scenario.<br />
The Circuit Meeting calls upon the<br />
<strong>Conference</strong> to ask the Connexional<br />
Stationing Committee to augment the<br />
procedure so as to provide clear guidance<br />
in such cases.<br />
Reply<br />
The <strong>Conference</strong> thanks the Falmouth and<br />
Gwennap Circuit Meeting for its memorial.<br />
The Stationing Committee reviews the<br />
guidance Connexional Good Practice<br />
for those involved in Stationing, now renamed<br />
the Code of Practice, each year.<br />
The <strong>Conference</strong> has been assured by the<br />
Committee that it will take this request into<br />
account during the next review.<br />
The <strong>Conference</strong> directs the Stationing<br />
Committee to report the outcome of this<br />
work in its annual report to the <strong>Conference</strong><br />
of 2013.<br />
It should be noted that the decision of<br />
the Circuit Invitation Committee should<br />
be discussed with the minister prior to<br />
the Circuit Meeting (E12), which would<br />
hopefully resolve any conflict. Should<br />
this not resolve the situation it would be<br />
normal practice for the Circuit Meeting to<br />
consider any reasoned statement from the<br />
minister. The Circuit Meeting may consider<br />
an amendment to the recommendation<br />
from the Circuit Invitation Committee,<br />
which may be accepted or rejected.<br />
Guidance on rules of debate can be found<br />
in Standing Order 131.<br />
M6 Stipends and Salaries for 2012/13<br />
The Telford (28/21) Circuit Meeting<br />
(Present: 50. Voting: 23 for, 12 against)<br />
recognises that the <strong>Methodist</strong> Church seeks<br />
to ensure that stipends and salaries paid to<br />
its staff keep pace with the cost of living.<br />
Stipends and salaries are the major<br />
element of a circuit budget and the<br />
assessments paid by its Local Churches.<br />
Consequently, the Circuit Meeting wishes<br />
to raise its concern that the current<br />
method used to apply a cost of living<br />
increase is difficult to support when the<br />
general trend in both public and private<br />
sectors is for the workforce to face a<br />
minimal increase, a pay freeze or even<br />
a pay cut. Pensioners are also suffering<br />
adverse effects on their incomes and<br />
resources.<br />
Therefore the Circuit Meeting requests that<br />
the <strong>Conference</strong> of 2012 considers capping<br />
the stipends and salaries of all <strong>Methodist</strong><br />
Church staff for 2012/13 at the same<br />
level as that paid in 2011/12 (excluding<br />
those staff on the Living Wage).<br />
Reply<br />
The <strong>Conference</strong> thanks the Telford Circuit<br />
Meeting for its memorial and assures the<br />
Circuit that its concerns regarding stipend<br />
and salary reviews have been taken into<br />
account in the recommendations brought<br />
to the <strong>Conference</strong> in the Connexional<br />
<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> 2012 773