03.04.2015 Views

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

57. The Fruitful Field Project<br />

about the location of a second centre,<br />

the Committee was particularly<br />

conscious of the grave responsibility<br />

placed on its shoulders, the more<br />

so if it was to seek the Connexion’s<br />

blessing to continue to be radical and<br />

challenging. The discernment which it<br />

was called to exercise in this instance<br />

was, in many ways, a culmination<br />

of nine months of engagement<br />

with a wide range of data, legal<br />

and property-related advice, cogent<br />

argument and detailed consultation<br />

submissions. This information had,<br />

in turn, been digested during private<br />

study, during discussions within small<br />

groups and during plenary sessions<br />

of the Committee.<br />

239 Two groups, comprising between them<br />

all the members of the Committee<br />

in attendance, undertook a final<br />

assessment of the configurations<br />

outlined in paragraphs 233-237<br />

above at the committee’s April<br />

2012 meeting. Both groups came,<br />

independently of one another, to<br />

the conclusion that the relative<br />

strengths and weaknesses of the<br />

configuration which includes the<br />

Queen’s Foundation and Cliff College<br />

were preferable to those of any of the<br />

other configurations which had been<br />

considered. Further interrogation of<br />

this conclusion took place during a<br />

lengthy plenary session.<br />

240 Having assessed and reflected on<br />

the marks of the contribution which<br />

two centres at Cliff College and the<br />

Queen’s Foundation should be able to<br />

provide to the Church and to the wider<br />

Network, the Committee highlighted<br />

the following considerations:<br />

240.1 The Committee was confident that<br />

centres at Cliff College and the<br />

Queen’s Foundation could serve as<br />

communities of faith which nurture<br />

and support a deep expertise<br />

in formation, learning, training,<br />

theological education, scholarship and<br />

organisational development. In terms<br />

of their particular contribution to the<br />

Network, the Committee highlights<br />

the following: (a) Cliff College’s<br />

experience of offering support to over<br />

230 dispersed students through a<br />

pattern of intensive modular training<br />

weeks delivered at the College<br />

combined with virtual or telephone<br />

individual tutorial support, and the<br />

College’s experience of supporting<br />

and delivering a number of modular,<br />

non-validated courses; (b) Cliff<br />

College’s expertise in nurturing a<br />

collegiate sense among a diverse<br />

cohort of students and friends –<br />

including residential students, parttime<br />

students, those who attend<br />

shorter courses, and those who<br />

attend the Cliff College Festival and<br />

other gatherings of supporters and<br />

alumni; (c) the Queen’s Foundation’s<br />

experience of operating as a<br />

“foundation” consisting of a number<br />

of centres (including the Centre for<br />

Ministerial Formation, the Graduate<br />

and Research Centre, the Selly Oak<br />

Centre for Mission Studies, and<br />

the Centre for Black Ministries and<br />

Leadership), where each centre<br />

has its particular focus and area of<br />

responsibility, but all centres work<br />

742 <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!