Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
57. The Fruitful Field Project<br />
about the location of a second centre,<br />
the Committee was particularly<br />
conscious of the grave responsibility<br />
placed on its shoulders, the more<br />
so if it was to seek the Connexion’s<br />
blessing to continue to be radical and<br />
challenging. The discernment which it<br />
was called to exercise in this instance<br />
was, in many ways, a culmination<br />
of nine months of engagement<br />
with a wide range of data, legal<br />
and property-related advice, cogent<br />
argument and detailed consultation<br />
submissions. This information had,<br />
in turn, been digested during private<br />
study, during discussions within small<br />
groups and during plenary sessions<br />
of the Committee.<br />
239 Two groups, comprising between them<br />
all the members of the Committee<br />
in attendance, undertook a final<br />
assessment of the configurations<br />
outlined in paragraphs 233-237<br />
above at the committee’s April<br />
2012 meeting. Both groups came,<br />
independently of one another, to<br />
the conclusion that the relative<br />
strengths and weaknesses of the<br />
configuration which includes the<br />
Queen’s Foundation and Cliff College<br />
were preferable to those of any of the<br />
other configurations which had been<br />
considered. Further interrogation of<br />
this conclusion took place during a<br />
lengthy plenary session.<br />
240 Having assessed and reflected on<br />
the marks of the contribution which<br />
two centres at Cliff College and the<br />
Queen’s Foundation should be able to<br />
provide to the Church and to the wider<br />
Network, the Committee highlighted<br />
the following considerations:<br />
240.1 The Committee was confident that<br />
centres at Cliff College and the<br />
Queen’s Foundation could serve as<br />
communities of faith which nurture<br />
and support a deep expertise<br />
in formation, learning, training,<br />
theological education, scholarship and<br />
organisational development. In terms<br />
of their particular contribution to the<br />
Network, the Committee highlights<br />
the following: (a) Cliff College’s<br />
experience of offering support to over<br />
230 dispersed students through a<br />
pattern of intensive modular training<br />
weeks delivered at the College<br />
combined with virtual or telephone<br />
individual tutorial support, and the<br />
College’s experience of supporting<br />
and delivering a number of modular,<br />
non-validated courses; (b) Cliff<br />
College’s expertise in nurturing a<br />
collegiate sense among a diverse<br />
cohort of students and friends –<br />
including residential students, parttime<br />
students, those who attend<br />
shorter courses, and those who<br />
attend the Cliff College Festival and<br />
other gatherings of supporters and<br />
alumni; (c) the Queen’s Foundation’s<br />
experience of operating as a<br />
“foundation” consisting of a number<br />
of centres (including the Centre for<br />
Ministerial Formation, the Graduate<br />
and Research Centre, the Selly Oak<br />
Centre for Mission Studies, and<br />
the Centre for Black Ministries and<br />
Leadership), where each centre<br />
has its particular focus and area of<br />
responsibility, but all centres work<br />
742 <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> 2012