Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
59. Memorials to the <strong>Conference</strong><br />
with the Committee’s recommended<br />
replies in the ordinary course of business,<br />
the <strong>Conference</strong> shall debate a resolution<br />
based on one or more of the memorials.<br />
This year, the Memorials Committee has<br />
agreed with the recommendation of the<br />
Business Committee that the replies to<br />
any memorials which relate to other items<br />
of business in the <strong>Agenda</strong> be taken at the<br />
same time as that business, and that the<br />
remaining replies should be taken en bloc.<br />
Any recommended reply to a memorial<br />
which is the subject of an amending notice<br />
of motion will automatically be removed<br />
from en bloc business [see Standing Order<br />
136(2A)].<br />
Throughout each session, the Memorials<br />
Secretary, Martin Harker, is available<br />
to members of the <strong>Conference</strong> for<br />
consultation on any matter affecting<br />
memorials and the procedures described<br />
above. For example, if any member wishes<br />
to change the recommended reply of the<br />
Committee, the Memorials Secretary<br />
is willing to advise on how and when to<br />
propose either an amendment or the<br />
substitution of a different reply.<br />
The Memorials Secretary will also notify<br />
each Synod and Circuit of the reply the<br />
<strong>Conference</strong> has made to its memorial.<br />
M1<br />
Stationing<br />
The Whitehaven (9/4) Circuit Meeting<br />
(Present: 35. Voting: unanimous), being<br />
a geographically-isolated Cumbrian rural<br />
Circuit and an area particularly affected<br />
by deprivation, is aware of the difficulty<br />
experienced by some northern Districts<br />
in filling presbyteral appointments for<br />
2012/13, and therefore expresses its<br />
concern that there are no longer any<br />
priority appointments, nor the filling of<br />
superintendencies before other presbyteral<br />
appointments. There is a real danger<br />
that west Cumbrian Circuits could find<br />
themselves without adequate presbyteral<br />
presence in the future. We urge the<br />
<strong>Conference</strong> and the Stationing Committee<br />
to look again at the invitation system and<br />
explore ways in which greater itinerancy<br />
can be promoted and the principles of<br />
being a connexional Church honoured.<br />
Reply<br />
The <strong>Conference</strong> thanks the Whitehaven<br />
Circuit Meeting for its memorial and notes<br />
with concern the difficulty experienced by<br />
some Districts in matching presbyters with<br />
some Circuits.<br />
The Stationing Matching Group works<br />
hard to ensure that as far as possible<br />
all Districts are represented fairly in the<br />
matches made, and always conducts a<br />
review of how each District has fared<br />
throughout the process. The matching<br />
process also endeavours to respond to the<br />
personal needs of presbyters. Matching<br />
has been particularly difficult this year,<br />
with a deficit of 38 presbyters in the<br />
process. This year’s stationing process<br />
is the second year of the pilot scheme,<br />
where all appointments are considered in<br />
the first round of matching. With this and<br />
the geographical anomalies in mind the<br />
Stationing Committee has commissioned<br />
a review of all aspects of the process.<br />
The <strong>Conference</strong> directs the Committee<br />
to report the results of the review and on<br />
770 <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> 2012