03.04.2015 Views

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

59. Memorials to the <strong>Conference</strong><br />

with the Committee’s recommended<br />

replies in the ordinary course of business,<br />

the <strong>Conference</strong> shall debate a resolution<br />

based on one or more of the memorials.<br />

This year, the Memorials Committee has<br />

agreed with the recommendation of the<br />

Business Committee that the replies to<br />

any memorials which relate to other items<br />

of business in the <strong>Agenda</strong> be taken at the<br />

same time as that business, and that the<br />

remaining replies should be taken en bloc.<br />

Any recommended reply to a memorial<br />

which is the subject of an amending notice<br />

of motion will automatically be removed<br />

from en bloc business [see Standing Order<br />

136(2A)].<br />

Throughout each session, the Memorials<br />

Secretary, Martin Harker, is available<br />

to members of the <strong>Conference</strong> for<br />

consultation on any matter affecting<br />

memorials and the procedures described<br />

above. For example, if any member wishes<br />

to change the recommended reply of the<br />

Committee, the Memorials Secretary<br />

is willing to advise on how and when to<br />

propose either an amendment or the<br />

substitution of a different reply.<br />

The Memorials Secretary will also notify<br />

each Synod and Circuit of the reply the<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> has made to its memorial.<br />

M1<br />

Stationing<br />

The Whitehaven (9/4) Circuit Meeting<br />

(Present: 35. Voting: unanimous), being<br />

a geographically-isolated Cumbrian rural<br />

Circuit and an area particularly affected<br />

by deprivation, is aware of the difficulty<br />

experienced by some northern Districts<br />

in filling presbyteral appointments for<br />

2012/13, and therefore expresses its<br />

concern that there are no longer any<br />

priority appointments, nor the filling of<br />

superintendencies before other presbyteral<br />

appointments. There is a real danger<br />

that west Cumbrian Circuits could find<br />

themselves without adequate presbyteral<br />

presence in the future. We urge the<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> and the Stationing Committee<br />

to look again at the invitation system and<br />

explore ways in which greater itinerancy<br />

can be promoted and the principles of<br />

being a connexional Church honoured.<br />

Reply<br />

The <strong>Conference</strong> thanks the Whitehaven<br />

Circuit Meeting for its memorial and notes<br />

with concern the difficulty experienced by<br />

some Districts in matching presbyters with<br />

some Circuits.<br />

The Stationing Matching Group works<br />

hard to ensure that as far as possible<br />

all Districts are represented fairly in the<br />

matches made, and always conducts a<br />

review of how each District has fared<br />

throughout the process. The matching<br />

process also endeavours to respond to the<br />

personal needs of presbyters. Matching<br />

has been particularly difficult this year,<br />

with a deficit of 38 presbyters in the<br />

process. This year’s stationing process<br />

is the second year of the pilot scheme,<br />

where all appointments are considered in<br />

the first round of matching. With this and<br />

the geographical anomalies in mind the<br />

Stationing Committee has commissioned<br />

a review of all aspects of the process.<br />

The <strong>Conference</strong> directs the Committee<br />

to report the results of the review and on<br />

770 <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!