03.04.2015 Views

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

57. The Fruitful Field Project<br />

made in this context. This would have<br />

included the potential for a strong<br />

partnership with Durham University,<br />

its theology faculty and St John’s<br />

College. The loss of this contribution<br />

is another consequence of the<br />

Committee’s recommendation which<br />

must be acknowledged. However,<br />

the Committee was content that<br />

the contribution which will be made<br />

by centres at Cliff College and the<br />

Queen’s Foundation will be able to<br />

meet the Network’s needs in this<br />

context. The proposed development<br />

of an ecumenical Higher Education<br />

partnership is a critical factor here<br />

(again, see paragraphs 148-156<br />

above), in that it has the possibility to<br />

enable the Network, and the Queen’s<br />

Foundation in particular, to work in<br />

close and efficient partnership with<br />

a Higher Education partner of the<br />

highest quality within the stable<br />

and mutually-beneficial environment<br />

established by the involvement of<br />

the Church of England, its theological<br />

colleges and the <strong>Methodist</strong> Church.<br />

The Committee also welcomed the<br />

possibility that, though the Church<br />

may regrettably have to move to end<br />

its activities at the Wesley Study<br />

Centre, it may be possible to retain<br />

a partnership with the University of<br />

Durham.<br />

240.6 The Committee was confident that<br />

centres at Cliff College and the<br />

Queen’s Foundation would be able<br />

to offer realistic accessibility from<br />

across the Connexion. In terms of<br />

their particular contribution to the<br />

Network, the Committee highlights<br />

the following: (a) Whereas there<br />

can be no doubt that Cliff College’s<br />

rural location poses accessibility<br />

issues, its location is geographically<br />

central and it is an hour’s travelling<br />

distance from Manchester and East<br />

Midlands airports; (b) Cliff College’s<br />

existing activities demonstrate that<br />

its location is not a disadvantage<br />

for a number of learners and friends<br />

who are prepared to travel to the<br />

College for high quality experiences.<br />

This includes over 280 students<br />

who currently travel to Cliff College<br />

from across the United Kingdom<br />

and Ireland, as well as from Europe<br />

and further afield, as well as 2,000<br />

people who regularly attend the Cliff<br />

College Festival; (c) the Queen’s<br />

Foundation’s urban location in the<br />

Midlands is served by strong road,<br />

rail and air transport links.<br />

240.7 The Committee was also confident<br />

that centres at Cliff College and the<br />

Queen’s Foundation, as premises and<br />

assets as well as communities of<br />

faith, demonstrate good stewardship<br />

of the <strong>Methodist</strong> people’s past<br />

and continuing investment of<br />

resources. In terms of their particular<br />

contribution to the Network, the<br />

Committee highlights the following:<br />

(a) Cliff College’s financially sound<br />

current operational model; (b) an<br />

appropriate identification of the<br />

authority of the <strong>Methodist</strong> Council<br />

and the <strong>Conference</strong> within Cliff<br />

College’s trusts; (c) the Queen’s<br />

Foundation’s readiness to explore<br />

revised governance and ownership<br />

arrangements (see paragraph 254<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> 2012 745

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!