Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
57. The Fruitful Field Project<br />
made in this context. This would have<br />
included the potential for a strong<br />
partnership with Durham University,<br />
its theology faculty and St John’s<br />
College. The loss of this contribution<br />
is another consequence of the<br />
Committee’s recommendation which<br />
must be acknowledged. However,<br />
the Committee was content that<br />
the contribution which will be made<br />
by centres at Cliff College and the<br />
Queen’s Foundation will be able to<br />
meet the Network’s needs in this<br />
context. The proposed development<br />
of an ecumenical Higher Education<br />
partnership is a critical factor here<br />
(again, see paragraphs 148-156<br />
above), in that it has the possibility to<br />
enable the Network, and the Queen’s<br />
Foundation in particular, to work in<br />
close and efficient partnership with<br />
a Higher Education partner of the<br />
highest quality within the stable<br />
and mutually-beneficial environment<br />
established by the involvement of<br />
the Church of England, its theological<br />
colleges and the <strong>Methodist</strong> Church.<br />
The Committee also welcomed the<br />
possibility that, though the Church<br />
may regrettably have to move to end<br />
its activities at the Wesley Study<br />
Centre, it may be possible to retain<br />
a partnership with the University of<br />
Durham.<br />
240.6 The Committee was confident that<br />
centres at Cliff College and the<br />
Queen’s Foundation would be able<br />
to offer realistic accessibility from<br />
across the Connexion. In terms of<br />
their particular contribution to the<br />
Network, the Committee highlights<br />
the following: (a) Whereas there<br />
can be no doubt that Cliff College’s<br />
rural location poses accessibility<br />
issues, its location is geographically<br />
central and it is an hour’s travelling<br />
distance from Manchester and East<br />
Midlands airports; (b) Cliff College’s<br />
existing activities demonstrate that<br />
its location is not a disadvantage<br />
for a number of learners and friends<br />
who are prepared to travel to the<br />
College for high quality experiences.<br />
This includes over 280 students<br />
who currently travel to Cliff College<br />
from across the United Kingdom<br />
and Ireland, as well as from Europe<br />
and further afield, as well as 2,000<br />
people who regularly attend the Cliff<br />
College Festival; (c) the Queen’s<br />
Foundation’s urban location in the<br />
Midlands is served by strong road,<br />
rail and air transport links.<br />
240.7 The Committee was also confident<br />
that centres at Cliff College and the<br />
Queen’s Foundation, as premises and<br />
assets as well as communities of<br />
faith, demonstrate good stewardship<br />
of the <strong>Methodist</strong> people’s past<br />
and continuing investment of<br />
resources. In terms of their particular<br />
contribution to the Network, the<br />
Committee highlights the following:<br />
(a) Cliff College’s financially sound<br />
current operational model; (b) an<br />
appropriate identification of the<br />
authority of the <strong>Methodist</strong> Council<br />
and the <strong>Conference</strong> within Cliff<br />
College’s trusts; (c) the Queen’s<br />
Foundation’s readiness to explore<br />
revised governance and ownership<br />
arrangements (see paragraph 254<br />
<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> 2012 745