03.04.2015 Views

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

59. Memorials to the <strong>Conference</strong><br />

Districts (in accordance with Standing<br />

Order 136(2C)), district Synods<br />

(often via the recommendation of the<br />

district treasurer) divide it between<br />

Circuits, and Circuit Meetings (often<br />

via the recommendation of the circuit<br />

treasurer) divide it between individual<br />

churches. This process ensures<br />

that decisions are taken as close<br />

as possible to the point of impact,<br />

ensuring that the most appropriate<br />

local factors are taken into account.<br />

The <strong>Conference</strong> considers this to<br />

be the most equitable and effective<br />

means of operating.<br />

The memorial refers to fluctuations<br />

in the year-on-year changes to the<br />

level of assessment paid by each<br />

individual Circuit. Such changes<br />

reflect the connexional nature of<br />

the <strong>Methodist</strong> Church: because the<br />

total MCF assessment is shared<br />

out as a fresh calculation each<br />

year, the level of payment required<br />

in any particular District is affected<br />

by the combination of changes<br />

across all other Districts relative<br />

to its own changes. This can result<br />

in significant changes in level of<br />

assessment from year-to-year, with<br />

possible changes of 15% or more<br />

required. In order to prevent such<br />

large annual swings, increases have<br />

in the past been capped. For the<br />

2012/13 figures that are before<br />

the <strong>Conference</strong> this cap is 7%. The<br />

level of this cap and its impact<br />

across the Church is discussed<br />

collaboratively each year with<br />

Districts via their treasurers before<br />

any recommendations are brought<br />

to the <strong>Methodist</strong> Council or the<br />

<strong>Conference</strong>.<br />

In addition to the deployment of<br />

ministers and lay employees, the<br />

apportionment between Districts is<br />

adjusted using the Nomenclature<br />

of Units for Territorial Statistics<br />

(NUTS) index of relative regional<br />

wealth. Recent experience has<br />

shown that the application of the<br />

NUTS index and a fixed cap often<br />

work against each other. This matter<br />

has been considered during the<br />

last year by the Council’s Budget<br />

Stakeholder Forum, which includes a<br />

representative of the Chairs’ Meeting<br />

and a District Treasurer. As a result,<br />

it is intended that draft figures for<br />

2013/14 with and without the NUTS<br />

formula and with and without any cap<br />

will be presented for discussion by<br />

District Treasurers.<br />

The <strong>Conference</strong> therefore declines<br />

this portion of the memorial, but<br />

instructs the <strong>Methodist</strong> Council<br />

to ensure that these options are<br />

amongst those presented for<br />

consultation via District Treasurers,<br />

feeling that it will be more effective to<br />

take a decision based on a clear view<br />

of what the actual financial impact<br />

will be, rather than establishing a new<br />

principle itself in abstract.<br />

c) Another matter considered by the<br />

Budget Stakeholder Forum this<br />

year has been the use of Circuit<br />

Model Trust Funds. At the end of<br />

2011 across the entire Connexion<br />

these contained approximately £70<br />

<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> 2012 779

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!