Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
Agenda Volume 3 - Methodist Conference
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
59. Memorials to the <strong>Conference</strong><br />
Districts (in accordance with Standing<br />
Order 136(2C)), district Synods<br />
(often via the recommendation of the<br />
district treasurer) divide it between<br />
Circuits, and Circuit Meetings (often<br />
via the recommendation of the circuit<br />
treasurer) divide it between individual<br />
churches. This process ensures<br />
that decisions are taken as close<br />
as possible to the point of impact,<br />
ensuring that the most appropriate<br />
local factors are taken into account.<br />
The <strong>Conference</strong> considers this to<br />
be the most equitable and effective<br />
means of operating.<br />
The memorial refers to fluctuations<br />
in the year-on-year changes to the<br />
level of assessment paid by each<br />
individual Circuit. Such changes<br />
reflect the connexional nature of<br />
the <strong>Methodist</strong> Church: because the<br />
total MCF assessment is shared<br />
out as a fresh calculation each<br />
year, the level of payment required<br />
in any particular District is affected<br />
by the combination of changes<br />
across all other Districts relative<br />
to its own changes. This can result<br />
in significant changes in level of<br />
assessment from year-to-year, with<br />
possible changes of 15% or more<br />
required. In order to prevent such<br />
large annual swings, increases have<br />
in the past been capped. For the<br />
2012/13 figures that are before<br />
the <strong>Conference</strong> this cap is 7%. The<br />
level of this cap and its impact<br />
across the Church is discussed<br />
collaboratively each year with<br />
Districts via their treasurers before<br />
any recommendations are brought<br />
to the <strong>Methodist</strong> Council or the<br />
<strong>Conference</strong>.<br />
In addition to the deployment of<br />
ministers and lay employees, the<br />
apportionment between Districts is<br />
adjusted using the Nomenclature<br />
of Units for Territorial Statistics<br />
(NUTS) index of relative regional<br />
wealth. Recent experience has<br />
shown that the application of the<br />
NUTS index and a fixed cap often<br />
work against each other. This matter<br />
has been considered during the<br />
last year by the Council’s Budget<br />
Stakeholder Forum, which includes a<br />
representative of the Chairs’ Meeting<br />
and a District Treasurer. As a result,<br />
it is intended that draft figures for<br />
2013/14 with and without the NUTS<br />
formula and with and without any cap<br />
will be presented for discussion by<br />
District Treasurers.<br />
The <strong>Conference</strong> therefore declines<br />
this portion of the memorial, but<br />
instructs the <strong>Methodist</strong> Council<br />
to ensure that these options are<br />
amongst those presented for<br />
consultation via District Treasurers,<br />
feeling that it will be more effective to<br />
take a decision based on a clear view<br />
of what the actual financial impact<br />
will be, rather than establishing a new<br />
principle itself in abstract.<br />
c) Another matter considered by the<br />
Budget Stakeholder Forum this<br />
year has been the use of Circuit<br />
Model Trust Funds. At the end of<br />
2011 across the entire Connexion<br />
these contained approximately £70<br />
<strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> 2012 779