09.06.2015 Views

1900 - Coalmininghistorypa.org

1900 - Coalmininghistorypa.org

1900 - Coalmininghistorypa.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

xlviil ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc.<br />

dustrial war; by rejecting the barbarous methods of the past; by respecting<br />

the rights of all and marching on with the progressive tendency<br />

of events. It points the way and shows that the working<br />

people, strong in numbers, in reason and rectitude, can achieve their<br />

emancipation without recourse to any act that will prove repulsive to<br />

the best instincts of human nature.''<br />

During the recent strike in the Anthracite regions arbitration was<br />

proposed and rejected. In view of that fact, in what way can another<br />

system be brought about? Shall there be a State Board of Arbitrators,<br />

and shall arbitration be made compulsory?<br />

It is unquestionably true that an act under which one of the parties<br />

to an industrial dispute has the right to bring all other parties before<br />

a public tribunal, smacks very much of State regulation of labor.<br />

This has in effect been brought about in New Zealand, and so far, the<br />

workings of the arbitration laws in effect there, have not been attended<br />

with very deleterious effects. In the first place if the parties<br />

to a labor dispute wish to settle their differences in their own way,<br />

the State does not meddle with them. Then, in the second place,<br />

had the law proved obnoxious, it would have been abrogated long<br />

ere this. Speaking of this feature of the law, the author of a recent<br />

publication explaining very fully the workings of the arbitration<br />

tribunal in New Zealand says:<br />

"The only serious adjustment, beyond the theoretical objection to<br />

state interference in any form which has been brought against this<br />

law by English writers, has been a statement that it has hampered<br />

enterprise and checked the growth of manufactures in the colony."<br />

New Zealanders know this to be quite baseless, for they know that<br />

the manufacturers of their colony have fully participated in the<br />

prosperity of the last five years. For some years past labor in<br />

almost every trade has been fully employed; the numbers of the workless<br />

have fallen progressively; new factories have been opened and<br />

buildings erected, and the shop keepers with whom the working<br />

classes deal, admit that business is better and debts fewer than at<br />

any time in the last twenty years in the colony. The annual report<br />

of the Chamber of Commerce and the periodical reviews of the trade<br />

and business published by the New Zealand newspapers of both sides<br />

in politics tell the same tale. But the briefest and most convincing<br />

argument for disabusing the minds of any who may favor the idea<br />

that the New Zealand Arbitration act has hampered industry, is<br />

found in the following figures, which give the number of hands employed<br />

in the registered factories of the colony for the past five years.<br />

It may be explained that the factory, in New Zealand, means every<br />

workship, small and large, and that registration is universal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!