66 WEDNESDAY 20 JULY• Beth-Ellen Pennell - University of Michigan, United States• Isabelle Renschler - FORS - Swiss Foundaon for <strong>Research</strong> in Social Sciences, Switzerland2.3.1 Adaptaon and measurement comparability in mullingual surveysJ. Harkness 11 University of Nebraska, Lincoln, United StatesThis paper sets out to provide a general overview of adaptaon needs and challenges in mullingual surveyresearch.2.3.2 <strong>Survey</strong> Quesonnaire Adaptaon across ModesS. Hansen 1 , B. Pennell 11 University of Michigan, United StatesIdeally, standardizaon of quesonnaires, meant to reduce measurement error, would involve standardizaonof mode (e.g., telephone or face-to-face and interviewer- or self-administered) and less variaon in other typesof error. The choice of modes becomes more complex in cross-naonal survey research. There may be widevariaon across naons in sample coverage, populaon access, nonresponse trends, literacy levels, and socialdesirability, as well as technical infrastructures, labor availability, and cost structures.2.3.3 <strong>Survey</strong> translaon in countries with mulple and non-standardised languagesE. Ersanilli 11 University of Oxford, United KingdomThere is a growing body of research on best pracces in survey translaon procedures, such as back-translaon,parallel translaon and TRAPD. Most of the studies on translaon procedures focus on research in Westerncountries. Less is known about translaon pracce and problems in surveys in developing and transion countries.These countries do not only tend to have a higher degree of linguisc diversity (in African almost everycountry has several populaon groups with different mother tongues), but some of the naonal and minoritylanguages do not have a fully standardized wrien form. This poses specific challenges to the translaonprocess.2.4 Quality Assurance in Cross-Naonal <strong>Survey</strong>sTo be held on July 20, 2011 from: 09:00 to 10:30, in room 319.Coordinated by: Gijs van Houten - Eurofound, Ireland2.4.1 Centralisaon vs. Harmonisaon, Streamlining mulnaonal survey operaons in a single projectinfrastructureA. Illyes 1 , P. Huszk 1 , G. Hideg 11 Gallup, BelgiumThe presentaon describes Gallup’s integrated mul-country survey architecture that centralises project implementaonto the fullest possible extent. This infrastructure, serving the Flash Eurobarometer as well asother presgeous mulnaonal studies, has been created in an XML environment using standard DDI, so thatevery instrument of the survey planning, preparaon, implementaon and assessment runs in a centralisedenvironment, with specific language ’masks’ where necessary. That is, all relevant documents, tools, processesand protocols are created centrally, and are automacally distributed with the appropriate languageor country flag to the naonal partners via web-based applicaons. Under the presented infrastructure, eachmajor data domain of survey implementaon (sampling, quesonnaire, translaon, data capture/scripng,automac eding, weighng, basic aggregaons)...
WEDNESDAY 20 JULY 672.4.2 Data Collecon Quality Assurance in Cross-Naonal <strong>Survey</strong>s: The Example of the ESSV. Halbherr 1 , A. Koch 1 , A. Scheuer 11 GESIS - Leibniz Instute for the Social Sciences, GermanyThe significance of cross-naonal surveys for the social sciences has increased over the past decades and withit the number of cross-naonal data sets that researchers have access to. Cross-naonal surveys are typicallylarge enterprises that demand dedicated efforts to coordinate the process of data collecon in the parcipangcountries. While cross-naonal surveys have addressed many important methodological problems, such astranslaon and the cultural applicability of concepts, the management of the data collecon process has yethad lile place in cross-naonal survey methodology.2.4.3 Checking and Balancing. Quality Assurance in the 5th <strong>European</strong> Working Condions <strong>Survey</strong>G. van Houten 1 , M. Lyly-Yrjanainen 1 , A. Parent Thirion 2 , G. Vermeylen 21 Eurofound, Ireland; 2 <strong>European</strong> Foundaon for the Improvement of Living and Working Condions, IrelandThe <strong>European</strong> Foundaon for the Improvement of Living and Working Condions (Eurofound) carries out threerecurring Europe-wide surveys: the <strong>European</strong> Working Condions <strong>Survey</strong> (EWCS), the <strong>European</strong> Quality of Life<strong>Survey</strong> (EQLS), and the <strong>European</strong> Company <strong>Survey</strong> (ECS). Most recently, the 5th wave of the EWCS was implemented.To ensure the producon of high quality data each stage of the survey was carefully planned, closelymonitored and documented, and specific controls were put in place. When designing the 5th wave of the survey,close aenon was paid to user sasfacon with the previous wave and on their future informaon needs.Furthermore, an assessment was made of possible improvements in the way in which the survey addressesthe topics that are central to <strong>European</strong> policy making...2.4.4 <strong>European</strong> Values Study – the 4th wave: how to ensure quality in an all <strong>European</strong> <strong>Survey</strong>-the perspecveof collector, user and archiveE. Brislinger 2 , R. Luijkx 11 Tilburg University, Netherlands; 2 GESIS - Leibniz Instute for the Social Sciences, GermanyWe will outline the efforts undertaken to maximize the quality of the 4th wave of the <strong>European</strong> Values Study,a large-scale, cross-naonal, and longitudinal survey research program started in 1981. The 2008 survey wasconducted in 47 countries/regions with a focus on a broad range of values and was highly comparable withthe earlier waves. High standards were used in developing and translang the quesonnaire, in sampling, inmonitoring the data collecon, and in data cleaning and documentaon. To guarantee easy access and properuse, the data are available on-line along with comprehensive documentaon on the study and variable level.2.4.5 Harmonising Standards for Quality Assessment in Cross Naonal <strong>Survey</strong>sM. Petrakos 1 , T. Ieromnimon 1 , P. Stavropoulos 2 , G. Petrakos 11 Agilis SA, Greece; 2 Agili, GreeceThe presentaon describes the development of harmonised standards for the assessment of Cross Naonalsurveys based on the framework developed for Official Stascs.Cross Naonal surveys are providing comparable informaon for a number of countries and form an importantbasis for scienfic research and policy making. Quality assessment is required at various levels for survey design,assessment of survey processes and data disseminaon. It is important for both data producers and moreimportantly users that the standards used are as much as possible harmonised. This will provide importantbenefits for the development of relevant aspects of survey methods as well as enable users to compare andcombine results and findings.