«<strong>Evaluation</strong>, <strong>Syn<strong>the</strong>sis</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Formulation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Proposals</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Use</strong> <strong>of</strong> ICTin <strong>the</strong> Tourism Sector»The first step was to collect <strong>the</strong> main findings from <strong>the</strong> previous phases <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project, that is:• The recording <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current situation in Greece (bodies/ organizations, strategy, researchprojects <strong>and</strong> studies, projects <strong>and</strong> ICT applications in tourism).• The recording <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current situation internationally, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> recording <strong>and</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong>international best practices.• The field research in websites, tourist enterprises <strong>and</strong> internet users, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> focus groups.• The studies <strong>for</strong> technological st<strong>and</strong>ards that are applied in tourism internationally, in issues<strong>of</strong> connectivity/ interoperability <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> advanced methods <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> promotion <strong>of</strong>tourist content.These findings are related to gaps in <strong>the</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> ICT methods in <strong>the</strong> tourism sector, oropportunities that can lead to a competitive advantage at <strong>the</strong> national <strong>and</strong>/or enterprise level. Thedeterminant factor is <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> a shortcoming. A gap necessarily involves some shortcoming,<strong>for</strong> example a practice that is absent in Greece but is followed in a technologically advanced country,directly competitive to Greece (e.g. inadequate marketing orientation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> National TourismOrganization). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, an opportunity does not necessarily imply a shortcoming. Usually, itrefers to a new practice not followed in directly competitive countries, which, if applied in Greece,would lead to an important advantage <strong>for</strong> our country. In any case, a finding is a problem to besolved.The next step was to classify <strong>the</strong>se findings into Thematic Areas, based on <strong>the</strong>ir relationships. Themain criterion <strong>for</strong> this classification was <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> seeking common solutions to <strong>the</strong> individualproblems, so as to avoid overlaps in <strong>the</strong> actions proposed. This way, <strong>the</strong> following <strong>the</strong>matic areaswere selected:• Tourism Strategy <strong>and</strong> Organization.• Technologies <strong>and</strong> Tourism.• Human Resources.• Synergies <strong>and</strong> Co operations.All <strong>the</strong>matic areas are concentrated in <strong>the</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> ICT methods. The «Tourism Strategy <strong>and</strong>Organization» <strong>the</strong>matic area concerns <strong>the</strong> strategic use <strong>of</strong> ICT, relevant organizational issues, as wellas pertinent legal <strong>and</strong> institutional matters. The «Technologies <strong>and</strong> Tourism» area includes moreparticular technological issues related to e-tourism. «Human Resources» refers to technological skills<strong>and</strong> issues relevant to technological attitudes <strong>and</strong> culture, while <strong>the</strong> last area, «Synergies <strong>and</strong> Cooperations» includes findings pertinent to <strong>the</strong> synergies in related sectors <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> collaborations at allVersion 1Month: December Year: 200712
«<strong>Evaluation</strong>, <strong>Syn<strong>the</strong>sis</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Formulation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Proposals</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Use</strong> <strong>of</strong> ICTin <strong>the</strong> Tourism Sector»levels; from <strong>the</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> tourism research to <strong>the</strong> Greek business practice, up to <strong>the</strong> cooperations <strong>and</strong> coalitions between SMEs.The final step after this classification was to <strong>for</strong>mulate <strong>the</strong> proposals in two dimensions, ThematicArea <strong>and</strong> Axis <strong>of</strong> Intervention, depending on <strong>the</strong> end user – recipient <strong>of</strong> each project or actiondeliverables (State <strong>and</strong> Enterprises, with a fur<strong>the</strong>r separation between SMEs <strong>and</strong> large enterprises incertain cases). The connection with <strong>the</strong> corresponding existing strategies <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> current nationalpriorities <strong>and</strong> projects is ensured by placing every proposed project or action in <strong>the</strong> appropriateprogram.Version 1Month: December Year: 200713
- Page 1 and 2: Project Title“Study for the Penet
- Page 3 and 4: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 5 and 6: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 7 and 8: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 9 and 10: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 11: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 15 and 16: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 17 and 18: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 19 and 20: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 21 and 22: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 23 and 24: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 25 and 26: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 27 and 28: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 29 and 30: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 31 and 32: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 33 and 34: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 35 and 36: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 37 and 38: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 39 and 40: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 41 and 42: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 43 and 44: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 45 and 46: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 47 and 48: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 49 and 50: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 51 and 52: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 53 and 54: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 55 and 56: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 57 and 58: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 59 and 60: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 61 and 62: «Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 63 and 64:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 65 and 66:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 67 and 68:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 69 and 70:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 71 and 72:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 73 and 74:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 75 and 76:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 77 and 78:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 79 and 80:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 81 and 82:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 83 and 84:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 85 and 86:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 87 and 88:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 89 and 90:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 91 and 92:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 93 and 94:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 95 and 96:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 97 and 98:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 99 and 100:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 101 and 102:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 103 and 104:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 105 and 106:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula
- Page 107:
«Evaluation, Synthesis and Formula