10.07.2015 Views

An Unhealthy America: The Economic Burden of ... - Milken Institute

An Unhealthy America: The Economic Burden of ... - Milken Institute

An Unhealthy America: The Economic Burden of ... - Milken Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>An</strong> <strong>Unhealthy</strong> <strong>America</strong><strong>Milken</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>Female Breast Cancer Female Patients Breast - Invasive Cancer Treatment Patients DistributionsInvasive Treatment DistributionsPercent70Expenditures PRC* Expenditures/PRCNo SurgeryDisease(Billions) Breast-Conserving (Millions) Surgery (Thousands)60Cancer 48.1 Breast-Conserving 10.6 Surgery w/Radiation 4.5Breast Cancer 50Mastectomy5.5 1.1 4.8Colon Cancer 3.9 0.3 11.5Lung Cancer 406.3 0.4 17.1Prostate Cancer 4.3 1.0 4.130Other Cancers 28.0 7.7 3.6Pulmonary 20Conditions 45.2 49.2 0.9Diabetes 27.1 13.7 2.0Hypertension 10History32.5 36.8 0.9ForecastHeart Disease 64.7 19.2 3.40Stroke 1993 1998 2003 13.620082013 2.4 2018 2023 5.6Sources: National Cancer <strong>Institute</strong>, Millken <strong>Institute</strong>Mental Disorders 45.8 30.3 1.5Total 277.0 162.2 1.7Still for breast cancer, PRC: we Population next want Reporting to calculate Condition the indirect impact ratio <strong>of</strong> presenteeism to lost workdays. We assumeit is affected by all four treatment options. However, we also assume that certain treatments will have a greater effect onpresenteeism: (1) no surgery (highest); (2) BCS with radiation; (3) mastectomy; and (4) BCS without radiation (lowest).We cannot be sure about the magnitude <strong>of</strong> variations in the first three categories so give them equal weights (0.3 each)and 0.1 for treatment option (4), BCS without radiation. We deflate the 2003 baseline presenteeism to lost workdaysimpact ratio by the weighted index. 85 <strong>The</strong> following table shows the ratio <strong>of</strong> presenteeism to lost workdays for cancer.CancerCancer - Presenteeism to Lost WorkdaysPresenteeism to Lost WorkdaysPresenteeism / AbsoluteExpenditures PRC* Expenditures/PRCYear Lost Workdays ChangeDisease(Billions) (Millions) (Thousands)2003 16.95 –Cancer 48.1 10.6 4.52004 16.64 -0.308Breast Cancer 5.5 1.1 4.82005 16.30 -0.343Colon Cancer 3.9 0.3 11.52006 15.95 -0.343Lung Cancer2007 15.626.3 0.4-0.34017.1Prostate Cancer 2008 15.33 4.3 1.0 -0.2844.1Other Cancers 2009 15.04 28.0 7.7 -0.2943.6Pulmonary Conditions 2010 14.86 45.2 49.2 -0.1770.9Diabetes 2011 14.63 27.1 13.7 -0.2292.0Hypertension 2012 14.46 32.5 36.8 -0.1660.9Heart Disease 2013 14.30 64.7 19.2 -0.1693.4Stroke 2014 13.96 13.6 -0.333 2.4 5.6Mental Disorders 2015 13.76 45.8 30.3 -0.2041.5Total 2016 277.0 13.57 162.2 -0.1901.7PRC: Population Reporting 2017 Condition 13.39 -0.1822018 13.21 -0.1782019 13.03 -0.1792020 12.85 -0.1772021 12.67 -0.1822022 12.50 -0.1732023 12.33 -0.171Source: <strong>Milken</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>85. For each series, we use 2003 as base year.[ 141 ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!