11.07.2015 Views

here - Linguistic Society of America

here - Linguistic Society of America

here - Linguistic Society of America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mark Baltin (New York University) Session 3Rose-Marie Déchaine (University <strong>of</strong> British Columbia)Martina Wiltschko, University <strong>of</strong> British ColumbiaThe structural heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> pronounsA pervasive problem for proponents <strong>of</strong> the view that bound variables must be c-commanded by their antecedents is the existence<strong>of</strong> donkey anaphora (term due originally to Geach (1962)), in which the c-command restriction obviously does not hold. Manytheorists have responded to this problem (Elbourne(2005), Barker & Shan(2006), and Barker (to appear)) by subsuming the twotypes <strong>of</strong> anaphora. We dispute this unification, finding cases in which various anaphoric forms can be used in donkey contextsbut cannot be used when the form is c-commanded by a quantificational antecedent. Our findings require the two phenomena tobe distinguished.Marlyse Baptista (University <strong>of</strong> Michigan) Session 86Susan Gelman (University <strong>of</strong> Michigan)Erica Beck (University <strong>of</strong> Michigan)Clancy Clements (Indiana University)Eric Russell (University <strong>of</strong> California, Davis)Cognitive processes in creole genesisCreoles typically develop in a multilingual setting, and as such are <strong>of</strong>ten viewed as emerging from the multiple grammars thatcontribute to their individual genesis. This panel evaluates competing and yet complementary theories <strong>of</strong> creole genesis whileexamining a set <strong>of</strong> cognitive processes at work in creole formation. We focus on the processes <strong>of</strong> restructuring, reanalysis,relexification and convergence, through the lens <strong>of</strong> three studies: copula and tense-aspect expression in Korlai Creole Portuguese(Clements), creole phonological restructuring in Tayo French Creole, Negerhollands and Haitian (Russell) and a psycholinguisticexperiment testing the convergence hypothesis in creole genesis (Baptista, Gelman & Beck).Dominika Baran (Duke University) Session 24Grammaticalization <strong>of</strong> shuo ‘to say’ as complementizer in Taiwan MandarinThe grammaticalization <strong>of</strong> SAY verbs as complementizers has been described in creoles (e.g. Lord 1993), African (Lord 1976) andAsian (e.g. Chappell 2008) languages, and African <strong>America</strong>n English (Frajzyngier 1984, Rickford 1977). This paper presentsevidence <strong>of</strong> this process in Taiwan Mandarin. I argue that (1) the complementizer function <strong>of</strong> the verb shuo ‘to say’ is the product<strong>of</strong> local language contact, (2) that its grammaticalization has advanced further than in most other Mandarin varieties, and (3) thatspeakers distinguish between shuo meaning ‘to say’ and shuo as complementizer, as shown in a variation analysis <strong>of</strong> TaiwanMandarin phonetic features.Jena Barchas-Lichtenstein (University <strong>of</strong> California, Los Angeles) Session 91A three-way distinction in Garifuna quantifiersThis paper describes a three-way distinction in quantifiers using cardinal numbers in Garifuna, an Arawak language chieflyspoken in Belize and Honduras. Garifuna has a three-way distinction between cardinal ('three balls'; (1a)), conclusive ('all / thethree balls'; (1b)), and partitive ('three <strong>of</strong> the balls'; (1c) constructions; I describe these constructions in detail. (See Barchas-Lichtenstein 2012 for a general description <strong>of</strong> Garifuna quantifiers). This paper is based chiefly on primary data elicited fromBelizean and Honduran Garifuna speakers in New York and Los Angeles; secondary data is drawn from published sources andcolleagues' work with speakers in Belize.Jonathan Barnes (Boston University) Session 38Alejna Brugos (Boston University)Elizabeth Rosenstein (Boston University)Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel (Massachusetts Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology)Nanette Veilleux (Simmons College)Segmental sources <strong>of</strong> variation in the timing <strong>of</strong> <strong>America</strong>n English pitch accentsTiming patterns in intonation systems reflect at once the stability <strong>of</strong> tonal alignment known as Segmental Anchoring, andsignificant contextual variation, much still poorly understood. In many languages, for example, key F0 targets occur relativelyearlier in closed syllables than in open. We present <strong>here</strong> new English production data allowing derivation <strong>of</strong> this pattern frombroader, perceptually motivated generalizations involving rhyme sonority and segment duration. A quantitative model <strong>of</strong> these128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!