11.07.2015 Views

here - Linguistic Society of America

here - Linguistic Society of America

here - Linguistic Society of America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cleveland Kent Evans (Bellevue University) Session 73From Clara Wieland to Janice Meredith: the influence <strong>of</strong> literature on baby names in the 19 th century United StatesDuring the 19 th century popular fiction inspired the use <strong>of</strong> many given names in the United States. Data from census recordsshows how certain names increased partly due to literary characters. Some examples include Clara, influenced by both “Wieland”and “Clara Howard” by Charles Brockden Brown at the start <strong>of</strong> the century, and Janice, invented by Paul Leicester Ford for“Janice Meredith” at the end <strong>of</strong> it. Other examples include Pearl from “The Scarlet Letter” and English author Marie Corelli’s“Thelma”. Surnames <strong>of</strong> authors such as Byron and Lowell also became given names under the influence <strong>of</strong> literature.Michael Falk (Independent Scholar) Session 69The names <strong>of</strong> Nova Scotia’s covesThis paper deals with the names <strong>of</strong> the 706 coves along the coast <strong>of</strong> Nova Scotia. Two <strong>of</strong> these names are Mi’kmaq, a few areFrench and the vast majority are English. Many coves bear the family name <strong>of</strong> an early settler. Other common types <strong>of</strong> name arebased on a physical description <strong>of</strong> the cove, e.g. Sandy Cove, human activity, e.g. Mill Cove, or animals or fish <strong>of</strong> possibleeconomic interest, e.g. Seal Cove or Herring Cove. The origin <strong>of</strong> the name <strong>of</strong> Peggy’s Cove, Nova Scotia’s popular touristattraction, will be discussed in detail.Emily Fedele (University <strong>of</strong> Southern California) Session 17Elsi Kaiser (University <strong>of</strong> Southern California)Anaphora and cataphora in Italian: consequences <strong>of</strong> linear order on null and overt pronounsPronoun interpretation is central for comprehension. Prior work focused mostly on anaphora, w<strong>here</strong> pronouns refer topreviously-mentioned antecedents. Less research is on cataphora, w<strong>here</strong> antecedents follow pronouns. Existing work suggestscataphora trigger an active-search mechanism: The parser actively searches for a syntactically-licensed antecedent. Our resultsshow that both processing constraints (‘impatient parser’) and the grammatical properties <strong>of</strong> referring expressions contribute tothe outcome <strong>of</strong> reference resolution. Furthermore, in line with related research, we find that strong grammatical principles(Binding Theory) are powerful enough to ‘block’ some processing effects, furthering our understanding <strong>of</strong> how differentcomponents <strong>of</strong> language processing interact.Sarah Fish (Boston University) Session 17Rama Novogrodsky (Boston University)Robert H<strong>of</strong>fmeister (Boston University)Synonyms and non-native ASL users: the power <strong>of</strong> phonologyThe present study investigates whether Deaf children <strong>of</strong> hearing parents (DCHP), a group which typically receives less than idealsign language input in both quality and timing, show decreasing preference for phonological foils and increasing preference forsemantic foils with age. 130 DCHP participants in two different age groups (6;0-7;0 and 13;0-14;0) took a receptive ASLsynonyms test. The performance <strong>of</strong> both age groups shows significant developmental improvement. In contrast to research withboth hearing and Deaf children natively acquiring a language, our results indicate that these non-native language learners do notswitch their preferences from phonological to semantic foils.Joel Fishbein (Pomona College) Session 34Jesse A. Harris (Pomona College)Using structural cues in processing polysemesPsycholinguistic research suggests that the processor initially activates an underspecified representation <strong>of</strong> a polyseme consistentwith all its senses, and t<strong>here</strong>after selects a specific sense only when grammatically required (Frazier & Rayner, 1990; Frisson &Pickering, 1999, 2001). A self-paced reading and crowd sourced fill-in-the-blanks task indicate that sense-selection is alsosensitive to default thematic-role assignment: the processor provisionally interprets clause-initial animate nouns as agents andt<strong>here</strong>by commits to a literal sense <strong>of</strong> the polyseme. Our results support a version <strong>of</strong> the underspecified processing model w<strong>here</strong>inthe processor utilizes structural cues to quickly home-in on a specific sense for the polyseme.151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!