11.07.2015 Views

here - Linguistic Society of America

here - Linguistic Society of America

here - Linguistic Society of America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Plenary AddressGrand Ballroom Salons G-KThursday, 3 January, 7:30 8:30 PMLanguage Change Across the LifespanGillian Sank<strong>of</strong>fUniversity <strong>of</strong> PennsylvaniaAlthough it is well known that second dialect and second language acquisition later in life result in grammars that are notisomorphic with those <strong>of</strong> native speakers, much less is understood about the kinds <strong>of</strong> modifications that may occur in L1 acrossthe lifespan. Further, the relationship between language change in the speech community and language change across the lifespanhas received little explicit attention prior to the past decade. It is generally accepted that it is in the course <strong>of</strong> L1 acquisition inchildhood that speakers have the opportunity to reformulate the grammars that constitute their linguistic input. However, researchmade possible from the study <strong>of</strong> recorded sociolinguistic interviews with speakers <strong>of</strong> Montréal French at three periods (1971;1984; 1995) has shed new light on issues <strong>of</strong> language acquisition and the nature <strong>of</strong> the critical period. This research has revealedthat in the case <strong>of</strong> changes ongoing within the speech community, t<strong>here</strong> are three possible relationships between lifespantrajectories and language change. Speakers may maintain their childhood grammars unchanged after primary languageacquisition (the default assumption in apparent time, which still proves to be the best first approximation); they may exhibitchange in the direction <strong>of</strong> the community change (thus contributing to an acceleration <strong>of</strong> the change); or they may become moreconservative as they age, reverting to patterns more typical <strong>of</strong> previous generations (thus at least potentially acting as a brake oncommunity change). All three <strong>of</strong> these patterns will be illustrated in this talk, which will conclude by considering the implications<strong>of</strong> these findings for our general understanding <strong>of</strong> language acquisition, language transmission and historical language change.During fieldwork for her dissertation on multilingualism in New Guinea (McGill University, 1968), Gillian Sank<strong>of</strong>f encountereda new generation <strong>of</strong> children learning the lingua franca, Tok Pisin, as a first language. Tok Pisin had previously been spokenalmost entirely as a second language, and the situation <strong>of</strong>fered a window on the transition from pidgin to creole. She subsequentlyreturned to Papua New Guinea several times to study creolization, focusing on changes in the language related to the emergence<strong>of</strong> this first generation <strong>of</strong> native speakers. Her quantitative research on morphophonology and syntax detected gradual changesacross generations, and showed continuing substrate influence. Since that time her central interest has been in issues <strong>of</strong>transmission in language change within a social matrix, as well as in language contact. Her dissertation on Papua New Guineawas followed up by research on bilingualism in Montréal with Pierrette Thibault in the 1990s.She taught at the Université de Montréal for more than a decade, carrying out a sociolinguistic study <strong>of</strong> French with colleaguesDavid Sank<strong>of</strong>f and Henrietta Cedergren. During this period she served as President <strong>of</strong> the Canadian Sociology and AnthropologyAssociation and was a Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford. After she moved to theUniversity <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania in 1979, colleagues in Québec continued the Montréal French study during the 1980s and 1990s,creating a longitudinal corpus that is the focus <strong>of</strong> her current research. The dialectic relationship <strong>of</strong> language change to change inspeakers grammars in childhood (the Tok Pisin research) has now been complemented by studies <strong>of</strong> changes in the grammars <strong>of</strong>adolescents and adults (the Montréal French research). The discovery <strong>of</strong> how lifespan trajectories vary in their relationship tolanguage change has proven surprising, and she continues to pursue this research direction in a book currently in progress.81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!