here - Linguistic Society of America

Greek. This approach has some theoretical consequences. First, the person feature is encoded in the head D of pronominal DPs,but not non-pronominal ones. Second, the agreement on the verb is indirectly controlled by the pronoun via the mediating head Dof pronoun-noun collocations.C.-T. Tim Chou (University of Michigan) Session 17Sujeewa Hettiarachchi (University of Michigan)On Sinhala case markingBased on (i) the interaction between case-marking and the interpretation of modals in Sinhala, and (ii) how case-marking affectsthe scopal interpretation of quantifier NPs., we argue that (i) case-marking in Sinhala is not entirely dependent upon the volitivityof the verbs, (ii) there exist both structural case and semantically determined inherent case in Sinhala, and (iii) A-movement inSinhala is case-driven, rather than EPP-driven (see Epstein & Seely 2006; Bosǩović 2002).Lina Choueiri (American University of Beirut) Session 41The syntax of prepositional datives in Lebanese ArabicFocusing on send-type verbs (Rappaport-Hovav and Levin 2008), I establish some of the analysis of prepositional datives inLebanese Arabic. In this talk, I build an argument for two alternative structures for prepositional datives, which parallel thealternative structures instantiated by give-type verbs, which give rise to the well-known dative alternation. I show how data fromvariable binding, quantifier scope interaction, and clitic-doubling can be accounted for in light of the two proposed alternativestructures. I also examine the interpretive dimension of the analysis and explore its consequences for the syntax of dativeconstructions.Wing-Yee Chow (University of Maryland) Session 34Colin Phillips (University of Maryland)Suiping Wang (South China Normal University)Unfolding predictions in semantic interpretation: insights from blindness to thematic role reversalsNeurolinguistic research has established that the N400, an event-related brain potential (ERP) response, is larger for unexpectedwords than expected words. Surprisingly, the N400 is ‘blind’ to gross thematic anomalies created by reversing the arguments inverb-final sentences. In three ERP experiments using the SOV ba-construction in Mandarin Chinese, we found that this blindnesscan be remedied if comprehenders have more time between the arguments and the verb to update their expectations. Thesefindings suggest that predictions are generated based on different types of information at different time scales. Lexical semanticrelations can impact predictions more immediately than word order.Barbara Citko (University of Washington) Session 13Martina Gračanin-Yuksek (Middle East Technical University)Multiple coordinated relative clausesSyntactic and semantic properties of coordinated wh-questions in (1) (CWHs) have received a lot of attention in recent years(Citko & Gračanin -Yuksek 2012, Gračanin -Yuksek 2007, Gribanova 2009, among others). (1) What and where did John sing?Given the well-documented parallels between questions and relative clauses, in this paper we ask whether analogous coordinationis ever possible in the domain of relativization, more specifically: (i) what types of relative clauses, if any, allow coordination ofrelative pronouns? (ii) do relative clauses with coordinated wh-pronouns exhibit the same amount of crosslinguistic variation asCWHs?Lauren Clemens (Harvard University) Session 3Gregory Scontras (Harvard University)Maria Polinsky (Harvard University)Resumptive pronouns in English: speaker-oriented reference trackingResumptive pronouns (RPs) are claimed to ameliorate English island violations, yet this theoretical intuition is notsubstantiated experimentally. In a departure from previous methodologies, we conducted an auditory experiment on theacceptability of RPs in English under several island conditions. Our results show that i) even in spoken language, themedium where they most naturally occur, RPs do not improve the perceived acceptability of English island violations,and ii) English RPs do not facilitate the parsing of island violations. We propose that English RPs are primarily acoreference-tracking device used by the speaker.142