Hedge funds and Private Equity - PES
Hedge funds and Private Equity - PES
Hedge funds and Private Equity - PES
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The rising number of hedge <strong>funds</strong> appears to go h<strong>and</strong> in h<strong>and</strong> with increasing competition<br />
between hedge <strong>funds</strong>. The market for those hedge <strong>funds</strong> pursuing arbitrage strategies is but<br />
one example of this. Here, a massive inflow of money managed by a growing number of hedge<br />
<strong>funds</strong> appears to have competed away many arbitrage opportunities.<br />
Due to increasing competition hedge fund managers have engaged in a search for alternative<br />
ways to maintain or increase yields in a market where average yields seem to be sloping downwards.<br />
In this context, many hedge fund managers are likely to consider investment opportunities<br />
involving more risk than was the case in the past. At least this is what has happened in the past,<br />
for instance in the early 1970s. In his recent book <strong>Hedge</strong> Hogging, the hedge fund <strong>and</strong> Wall<br />
Street veteran Barton Biggs describes the years from 1970 to 1973 as a period in which<br />
increasing competition led many hedge fund managers to take ever greater risks, with facile<br />
hedges. As a consequence “(…) many hedge <strong>funds</strong> crashed <strong>and</strong> burned because they were<br />
really just leveraged long <strong>funds</strong> <strong>and</strong> as a result suffered huge declines”, Biggs writes, adding<br />
“Other <strong>funds</strong> had bought private equity-venture deals that turned out to be totally illiquid when<br />
things got tough.” 64<br />
This process of rise <strong>and</strong> fall does not seem to be historically unique. For instance, the period<br />
between 1995 <strong>and</strong> 2002, a period characterised by first an upward <strong>and</strong> later a downward<br />
sloping market had a failure rate of 32% among <strong>funds</strong> with assets under management lower than<br />
$ 50 million. The same happened to around two thirds of <strong>funds</strong> of a size between $ 50 million<br />
<strong>and</strong> $ 150 million. This percentage decreases significantly to less than 4% in the case of <strong>funds</strong><br />
with more than $ 150 million assets under management. The highest failure rates are found in the<br />
field of managed futures (derivatives) that we turn to further below. By contrast, convertible arbitrage<br />
<strong>and</strong> event driven strategies appear to have considerably lower failure rates. 65<br />
Since 2002 the market has been sloping gradually upward for developed markets <strong>and</strong> rapidly<br />
upward for emerging markets, e.g. South-East Asia. Yet, this process might stop once more <strong>and</strong><br />
lead to large-scale failures. It is difficult to assess when this could happen. And in the absence<br />
of regulation it is most likely that the failures will repeat themselves. Moreover, the failures may<br />
have a much more profound impact on financial stability than we have seen in the past. This is<br />
not least due to some of the factors that will be addressed in the rest of this chapter, among<br />
them the growing amount of assets under management.<br />
5.2 Growing assets under management<br />
The crisis of LTCM <strong>and</strong> other hedge <strong>funds</strong> proved only to be a temporary setback for the longterm<br />
growth of the hedge fund industry According to conservative estimates, assets under<br />
management by single strategy hedge <strong>funds</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the so called <strong>funds</strong> of <strong>funds</strong>, have climbed<br />
from less than $100 billion in 1990 to more than $1,100 billion in 2005 (see Part I)]. Less<br />
conservative estimates suggest that the assets under management amount to more than $1,800<br />
billion in 2005. 66 Currently, the staggering growth rates – a 16-year average of 15% p.a. –<br />
continue. Thus, some even predict that the assets under management could double again within<br />
the next three years. This growth increases the potential impact of a financial crisis.<br />
Despite its rapid growth, the hedge fund market remains small compared to the size of the<br />
markets for non-alternative investments, such as the market for traditional mutual <strong>funds</strong> (UCITS).<br />
For instance, mutual <strong>funds</strong> globally managed $ 17,771 billion in 2005. In other words, hedge<br />
<strong>funds</strong> managed assets of between 6 <strong>and</strong> 10% of what mutual <strong>funds</strong> managed. This ratio has<br />
grown by around 0.7-1.0% since 2002 EoY (+12%).<br />
64 Biggs, B. (2006): <strong>Hedge</strong> Hogging, Hoboken (NJ): Wiley & Sons.<br />
65 The President’s Working Group on Financial Markets (1999): <strong>Hedge</strong> Funds, Leverage, <strong>and</strong> the Lessons of Long-Term Capital Management,<br />
http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/reports/hedgfund.pdf, p. viii (17.11.2006).<br />
Part II – Six concerns about our European social market economy<br />
135