24.11.2012 Views

Hedge funds and Private Equity - PES

Hedge funds and Private Equity - PES

Hedge funds and Private Equity - PES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The rising number of hedge <strong>funds</strong> appears to go h<strong>and</strong> in h<strong>and</strong> with increasing competition<br />

between hedge <strong>funds</strong>. The market for those hedge <strong>funds</strong> pursuing arbitrage strategies is but<br />

one example of this. Here, a massive inflow of money managed by a growing number of hedge<br />

<strong>funds</strong> appears to have competed away many arbitrage opportunities.<br />

Due to increasing competition hedge fund managers have engaged in a search for alternative<br />

ways to maintain or increase yields in a market where average yields seem to be sloping downwards.<br />

In this context, many hedge fund managers are likely to consider investment opportunities<br />

involving more risk than was the case in the past. At least this is what has happened in the past,<br />

for instance in the early 1970s. In his recent book <strong>Hedge</strong> Hogging, the hedge fund <strong>and</strong> Wall<br />

Street veteran Barton Biggs describes the years from 1970 to 1973 as a period in which<br />

increasing competition led many hedge fund managers to take ever greater risks, with facile<br />

hedges. As a consequence “(…) many hedge <strong>funds</strong> crashed <strong>and</strong> burned because they were<br />

really just leveraged long <strong>funds</strong> <strong>and</strong> as a result suffered huge declines”, Biggs writes, adding<br />

“Other <strong>funds</strong> had bought private equity-venture deals that turned out to be totally illiquid when<br />

things got tough.” 64<br />

This process of rise <strong>and</strong> fall does not seem to be historically unique. For instance, the period<br />

between 1995 <strong>and</strong> 2002, a period characterised by first an upward <strong>and</strong> later a downward<br />

sloping market had a failure rate of 32% among <strong>funds</strong> with assets under management lower than<br />

$ 50 million. The same happened to around two thirds of <strong>funds</strong> of a size between $ 50 million<br />

<strong>and</strong> $ 150 million. This percentage decreases significantly to less than 4% in the case of <strong>funds</strong><br />

with more than $ 150 million assets under management. The highest failure rates are found in the<br />

field of managed futures (derivatives) that we turn to further below. By contrast, convertible arbitrage<br />

<strong>and</strong> event driven strategies appear to have considerably lower failure rates. 65<br />

Since 2002 the market has been sloping gradually upward for developed markets <strong>and</strong> rapidly<br />

upward for emerging markets, e.g. South-East Asia. Yet, this process might stop once more <strong>and</strong><br />

lead to large-scale failures. It is difficult to assess when this could happen. And in the absence<br />

of regulation it is most likely that the failures will repeat themselves. Moreover, the failures may<br />

have a much more profound impact on financial stability than we have seen in the past. This is<br />

not least due to some of the factors that will be addressed in the rest of this chapter, among<br />

them the growing amount of assets under management.<br />

5.2 Growing assets under management<br />

The crisis of LTCM <strong>and</strong> other hedge <strong>funds</strong> proved only to be a temporary setback for the longterm<br />

growth of the hedge fund industry According to conservative estimates, assets under<br />

management by single strategy hedge <strong>funds</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the so called <strong>funds</strong> of <strong>funds</strong>, have climbed<br />

from less than $100 billion in 1990 to more than $1,100 billion in 2005 (see Part I)]. Less<br />

conservative estimates suggest that the assets under management amount to more than $1,800<br />

billion in 2005. 66 Currently, the staggering growth rates – a 16-year average of 15% p.a. –<br />

continue. Thus, some even predict that the assets under management could double again within<br />

the next three years. This growth increases the potential impact of a financial crisis.<br />

Despite its rapid growth, the hedge fund market remains small compared to the size of the<br />

markets for non-alternative investments, such as the market for traditional mutual <strong>funds</strong> (UCITS).<br />

For instance, mutual <strong>funds</strong> globally managed $ 17,771 billion in 2005. In other words, hedge<br />

<strong>funds</strong> managed assets of between 6 <strong>and</strong> 10% of what mutual <strong>funds</strong> managed. This ratio has<br />

grown by around 0.7-1.0% since 2002 EoY (+12%).<br />

64 Biggs, B. (2006): <strong>Hedge</strong> Hogging, Hoboken (NJ): Wiley & Sons.<br />

65 The President’s Working Group on Financial Markets (1999): <strong>Hedge</strong> Funds, Leverage, <strong>and</strong> the Lessons of Long-Term Capital Management,<br />

http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/reports/hedgfund.pdf, p. viii (17.11.2006).<br />

Part II – Six concerns about our European social market economy<br />

135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!