Hedge funds and Private Equity - PES
Hedge funds and Private Equity - PES
Hedge funds and Private Equity - PES
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
DIS<br />
1. Company description<br />
The DIS Deutscher Industrie Service AG is one of the five largest providers on the German<br />
market for temporary employment. Through its specialization in the qualified segment DIS AG is<br />
clearly differentiated from the rest of the market. DIS is based in Duesseldorf <strong>and</strong> it has 161<br />
branches in 73 cities <strong>and</strong> 7 300 employees.<br />
The strategy of DIS AG is based on the concentration on the German market, increasing market<br />
share, the provision of qualified personnel services in five clearly separated business divisions<br />
<strong>and</strong> the performance-oriented remuneration of employees.<br />
2. Economic <strong>and</strong> social effects<br />
2. 1 <strong>Hedge</strong> fund description<br />
In 2006 the Swiss recruitment agency group Adecco launched a takeover bid for DIS. The actions<br />
of DIS <strong>and</strong> Adecco were unusual by German st<strong>and</strong>ards. Adecco’s chief executive <strong>and</strong><br />
major shareholder Klaus Jacobs acquired a 29% stake in DIS from Dieter Paulmann, former chief<br />
executive of DIS <strong>and</strong> its main shareholder. Jacobs then made a public offer to buy the other<br />
shareholders’ stakes in the company. The chief executive of DIS, Dieter Scheiff, initially resisted<br />
the takeover. Jacobs won him over by promising to appoint him chief executive of Adecco after<br />
the takeover.<br />
Adecco subsequently acquired 83% of the shares in DIS. In the meantime, two hedge <strong>funds</strong> had<br />
bought into DIS, Elliott International having acquired a 10% stake <strong>and</strong> the Liverpool Limited Partnership<br />
a 3% stake. Adecco planned to acquire more than 95% of DIS by squeezing out the remaining<br />
shareholders with a cash settlement. Adecco also intended to delist DIS <strong>and</strong> to slash<br />
dividends by 80% from the levels of previous years. Delisting would effectively compel shareholders<br />
to sell their stakes in the company since the shares would scarcely be freely negotiable<br />
any more. The hostile dividend policy also served to drive out shareholders.<br />
2.2 Management policies <strong>and</strong> shareholder activism: stock option<br />
programs, effects on board <strong>and</strong> CEO´s, management fees,<br />
employee information<br />
At the general meeting of 8 June 2006, DIS wanted its shareholders to take decisions to delist<br />
the company <strong>and</strong> cut its dividends. Small investors employed stratagems involving the tabling of<br />
numerous motions to ensure that these main items of business could not be discussed on the<br />
day of the meeting. The decisions in question were not taken until the early hours of 9 June,<br />
whereas the general meeting had been scheduled for 8 June. The Higher Regional Court in Düsseldorf<br />
ruled in favour of the litigants who challenged the validity of these decisions, <strong>and</strong> DIS had<br />
to remain a listed company. At the general meeting, Elliott International managed to secure the<br />
appointment of a ‘special representative’ to examine claims for damages. Allegations were raised<br />
that DIS chief executive Dieter Scheiff <strong>and</strong> his head of finance, Dominik de Daniel, who also<br />
switched to Adecco, may have divulged trade secrets to DIS’s former competitor. Adecco had<br />
not yet consolidated its position as majority shareholder in the group by means of a control agreement.<br />
DIS commissioned a specialists’ report, which valued the company at €51.82 per share.<br />
The offer made to the minority shareholders amounted to €58.50 per share. On 7 June 2006,<br />
Annex – 21 Case studies<br />
197