24.11.2012 Views

Hedge funds and Private Equity - PES

Hedge funds and Private Equity - PES

Hedge funds and Private Equity - PES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

46<br />

If we assume US mutual fund industry to be around $ 7.000 bn <strong>and</strong> the average management fee<br />

to be 0.60%, the aggregate gross fee income would be (simplifying to the extreme) around<br />

$ 42 bn. In other words, it is not entirely unthinkable that the global hedge <strong>funds</strong> industry is<br />

generating more fees than the much larger US mutual fund industry.<br />

But this is not the total picture.<br />

Some studies estimate that hedge <strong>funds</strong> pay:<br />

4-5 % of AUM to their managers (management fees plus performance)<br />

Around 4 % of AuM to the investment banking industry<br />

To maintain this pay-out <strong>and</strong> keep investors confident <strong>and</strong> satisfied, hedge <strong>funds</strong> need growth<br />

returns of around 20 %!<br />

This fee structure <strong>and</strong> the level is not a “law of nature”. Neither is it market based. It simply seems<br />

to be a “characteristic” of the hedge fund industry <strong>and</strong> not questioned or challenged by anyone.<br />

We think it highly questionable because the pressure of hedge <strong>funds</strong> to create such huge gross<br />

returns is in itself having strong effects on the character <strong>and</strong> concrete content of hedge fund<br />

strategies.<br />

The impact of fees <strong>and</strong> transaction costs to hedge <strong>funds</strong>, investment banks, prime brokers <strong>and</strong><br />

trading counter parties is illustrated in a recent study (Dresdner/Kleinwort. <strong>Equity</strong> research.<br />

February 2007). As seen from the two charts, the “net return to investors” on the right h<strong>and</strong> side<br />

represents the HFR composite index return net of all fees. By adding the 2 % plus 20 % fee<br />

structure, the “gross performance after execution costs” is reached. If we then add the execution<br />

costs, we are having the “gross performance before execution costs”.<br />

A recent paper from Dresdner Kleinwort illustrates this point 11 :<br />

2006<br />

2005<br />

(%)<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

<strong>Hedge</strong> fund industry – from gross return to net return<br />

22.5<br />

0<br />

Gross performance Execution cost Gross performance<br />

before execution received by investment after execution cost<br />

cost<br />

banks<br />

Source: Dresdner Kleinwort Equities research estimates<br />

(%)<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

17.0<br />

4.3<br />

3.8<br />

18.3 5.3<br />

Fees paid to hedge<br />

fund managers<br />

11 Dresdner Kleinwort, “Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, UBS - How important are hedge <strong>funds</strong> for the investment banking industry?”, <strong>Equity</strong><br />

Research 6. February 2007, p.16.<br />

13.1<br />

0<br />

Gross performance Execution cost Gross performance<br />

before execution received by investment after execution cost<br />

cost<br />

banks<br />

Source: Dresdner Kleinwort Equities research estimates<br />

4.3<br />

Fees paid to hedge<br />

fund managers<br />

13.0<br />

Net performance<br />

to investors<br />

18.8<br />

Net performance<br />

to investors

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!