Hedge funds and Private Equity - PES
Hedge funds and Private Equity - PES
Hedge funds and Private Equity - PES
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
218<br />
Mobilcom<br />
1. Company description<br />
Mobilcom is a listed mobile communications company. It does not have its own network but<br />
buys blocks of airtime from other carriers <strong>and</strong> resells them to its own customers. Its subsidiary<br />
freenet.de is an Internet service provider. In 2000 the company took part in the Federal Government’s<br />
auction of UMTS licenses (Mobile broadb<strong>and</strong> network) <strong>and</strong> obtained an operating<br />
license for €8 billion. Its turnover in the past few years has amounted to some €2 billion.<br />
2. Economic <strong>and</strong> social effects<br />
2.1 <strong>Private</strong> equity fund description<br />
In 2000 France Télécom (FT) acquired a 28.5% stake in the company. FT gave a contractual<br />
undertaking to fund the establishment of a UMTS service. At the same time, FT negotiated an<br />
option to acquire a majority stake in Mobilcom in 2003. In 2000 Mobilcom’s losses amounted<br />
to €89 million. These increased to €205 million in 2001. In 1997 Mobilcom had employed 220<br />
people. By 2002 the workforce had grown to 5 500. At that time, France Télécom itself was in<br />
debt to the tune of €70 billion. In 2001 Mobilcom began to establish its own mobile network. In<br />
mid-2001 it had 5.2 million customers. Its debts amounted to five billion euros, <strong>and</strong> its debt-toequity<br />
ratio was considerably higher than that of its competitors.<br />
The funding pledges made to Mobilcom applied only to the establishment of a UMTS network.<br />
By this time, however, all the experts agreed that Mobilcom would not make a profit from its<br />
UMTS operations, not even in the long term.<br />
In 2002 the government stepped in to save the company from insolvency. France Télécom now<br />
tried to do all in its power to withdraw from its financial commitments to Mobilcom. An infringement<br />
of the code of business practice by Gerhard Schmid, chief executive of Mobilcom, gave<br />
France Télécom the opportunity to declare that it no longer felt bound by its existing contracts<br />
<strong>and</strong> to go back on its pledge to finance the establishment of a UMTS network. After a lengthy<br />
dispute, France Télécom <strong>and</strong> Mobilcom reached a compromise, whereby FT took over debts<br />
amounting to €7 billion. The compromise deal was approved at an extraordinary general meeting<br />
at the beginning of 2003. The costly license secured by Mobilcom in the UMTS auction had<br />
to be returned unused to the Federal Government. At a general meeting in April 2005, Mobilcom’s<br />
shareholders voted by a large majority to bring an action for damages against FT for having<br />
pulled out of the funding agreements.<br />
In May 2005 France Télécom sold 27.3% of the shares in Mobilcom to the US private equity investment<br />
combine Texas Pacific Group (TPG) <strong>and</strong> retained a 1% share for itself. TPG obtained<br />
three out of twelve seats on the supervisory board.<br />
2.2 Debt structure, alteration of company<br />
capital management fees requested by LBO<br />
Before the planned merger with Freenet, Mobilcom once more had a high liquidity ratio as a<br />
result of the disposal of its debts. Mobilcom’s routine business yielded steady operating profits.<br />
This aroused the interest of the private equity investor, as did the fact that the book values of Mobilcom’s<br />
assets were set very low in relation to their real current value. A merger with Freenet<br />
would offer the opportunity to convert the balance sheet from book values to current values. This