11.07.2015 Views

I-66 Multimodal Study Final Report - Virginia Department of ...

I-66 Multimodal Study Final Report - Virginia Department of ...

I-66 Multimodal Study Final Report - Virginia Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Multimodal</strong> Packages3.10 Bicycle and Pedestrian System EnhancementsBicycle and pedestrian improvements are incorporated as a common component to all multimodalpackages and are intended to provide increased accommodation for longer distancecommute trips along the I-<strong>66</strong> corridor, as well as shorter trips to access Metrorail stations andtransit (bus) stops throughout the study area. Projects include a combination <strong>of</strong> on-road bicyclefacilities (e.g., bicycle lanes and shared lane markings), signed bicycle routes, new or improved<strong>of</strong>f-road trails and sidepaths, and intersection improvements to enhance crossing safety andcomfort.Additional bicycle parking in commercial areas and at transit stations, as well as expandedbikeshare facilities also are included to increase the utility and attractiveness <strong>of</strong> bicycling fortransportation, for both routine as well as spontaneous trips.Bicycle and Pedestrian Project IdentificationThe projects included in this study represent a subset <strong>of</strong> the larger bicycle and pedestrianimprovement needs for the study area. Many projects are sourced from existing or ongoingplanning activities in Fairfax County, the City <strong>of</strong> Falls Church, Arlington County, Northern<strong>Virginia</strong> Regional Park Authority (NVRPA), WMATA, and VDOT. Other projects were recommendedeither explicitly by stakeholders and the community, or were included based ongeneral needs (e.g., need better transit access) articulated by stakeholders at communitymeetings, during stakeholder interviews, or through the project survey. Lastly, a few projectsnecessary for overall network connectivity and system functionality were included based onthe pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgment <strong>of</strong> the project team, which may result in variations from local plans.The selected projects were deemed to be <strong>of</strong> regional significance due to their function in theoverall transportation system. For instance, a bicycle lane project on a road leading to a transitstation is included in this analysis, but the ‘tributary’ facility improvements on side streetsleading to this bicycle lane project may not be included. Table 3.20 and the corresponding mapshown in Figure 3.43 present all bicycle and pedestrian system enhancements evaluated as part<strong>of</strong> this study. Some <strong>of</strong> the projects have moved past the project identification stage and are inplanning or design phase by local jurisdictions. These projects are identified in Table 3.20 by anasterisk next to the project name.It should be noted that given the relatively high-level nature <strong>of</strong> this study, a planning-levelanalysis has been applied to the included bicycle and pedestrian projects. In addition, projectswere reviewed with planning staff in local jurisdictions and many <strong>of</strong> their comments have beenincorporated. It is recognized that further analysis may be required to investigate the actualfeasibility and design considerations (e.g., right-<strong>of</strong>-way impacts) for each project.I-<strong>66</strong> <strong>Multimodal</strong> <strong>Study</strong> 3-75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!