I-66 Multimodal Study Final Report - Virginia Department of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Multimodal PackagesTable 3.25 Bicycle Projects Grouped by Trip Orientation Served (continued)Map ID Project Name Trip Orientation31 Harrison Street Bicycle Boulevard Linear32 Arlington Boulevard and Manchester Street Intersection Linear33 Bluemont Park to Upton Hill Park Trail Linear34 Arlington Boulevard Trail Linear36 W&OD Realignment at East Falls Church Park Linear39 W&OD Realignment at East Falls Church Linear42 W&OD Trail Crossing at Lee Highway Linear44 Falls Church Area Bikeshare Stations Linear45 W&OD Realignment at West Street Linear55 George C. Marshall Drive/Los Pueblos Lane Bicycle Lanes Linear56 I-495 Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge – Connector Trail Linear57 Hurst Street/Virginia Lane Linear3 VA Route 110 South Trail Paving Transit4 VA Route 110 North Trail Renovation Transit7 Metrorail Station Bicycle Parking Enhancement – Rosslyn Transit19 Metrorail Station Bicycle Parking Enhancement – Court House Transit22 Metrorail Station Bicycle Parking Enhancement – Clarendon Transit25 Metrorail Station Bicycle Parking Enhancement – Virginia Square Transit26 Metrorail Station Bicycle Parking Enhancement – Ballston Transit37 Roosevelt Boulevard Sharrows Transit38 Hillwood Avenue/Lee Hwy Bicycle Lanes Transit41 Metrorail Station Bicycle Parking Enhancement – East Falls Church Transit43 S. Washington Street On-Road Bicycle Facility TransitAdditional Considerations for Bicycle and Pedestrian ImprovementsThe study area has a relatively rich network of on- and off-street bicycle and pedestrianaccommodations. The Custis Trail is one of the most heavily used trails in the Washington,D.C. region for commuters, as evidenced by the bicycle count data shown in the existing conditionssection of this study. An enhanced sidepath along U.S. 50/Arlington Boulevard linkingthe City of Fairfax to the Rosslyn Ballston corridor in Arlington County could provide similarfunctionality for travelers coming from the south. Furthermore, Fairfax County is exploring thepossibility of extending the Custis Trail west along I-66, which could considerably expand thecatchment area and ridership for this important and heavily used trail system.Care must be exercised to ensure that any improvements to any aspect of the transportationsystem consider the impacts to bicycle and pedestrian accommodation. For example, adding athird lane to I-66 may mean that at least some sections of the Custis Trail must be rebuilt at thesame grade as the roadway for right-of-way and slope reasons. This may ameliorate some ofthe topographical challenges presented by the current trail alignment as the reconstructed trail3-96 I-66 Multimodal Study
Multimodal Packageswould follow a relatively flat course. However, the extensive connectivity to existing neighborhoodsmay be compromised due to significant changes in elevation between the trail whichwould be in a trench with the highway and neighborhoods which are much higher.Maintaining the same level of connectivity may require relatively costly vertical structures,either ramps or helixes to reach from the trail bed to the neighborhood access points. On theother hand, incorporating bicycle and pedestrian improvements into larger transportationprojects can be a successful strategy for accelerating implementation and enhancing the multimodaltransportation network.3.11 Multimodal Packages Summary FindingsThe following table, Table 3.26, summarizes the main measures of effectiveness used to compareacross packages. These measures are for the study area and systemwide, and highlight thedifferences in performance for each package compared to the CLRP+ Baseline.In addition to the measures of effectiveness included in Table 3.26, an initial assessment ofcost/benefit was completed for the packages. The cost/benefit assessment process outlined inthe Interim Report was followed, and did not provide useful information to help discern therelative impacts of the individual multimodal packages. It is important to note that the keyinputs into the cost/benefit assessment were the same as those used to evaluate the multimodalpackages including VMT, congested VMT, travel time, and overall package costs.Social EquitySocial equity analysis was not performed as part of the I-66 Multimodal Study, in part becauseof its long range planning horizon and the subregional focus. As proposed improvementsmove closer towards implementation, a need to evaluate equity across its various dimensionswill grow in importance. Numerous impacts may need to be considered as well as the differentways available to categorize people for analysis and to measure impacts.I-66 Multimodal Study 3-97
Page 2 and 3:
20120618
Page 4 and 5:
Table of ContentsTable of Contents(
Page 6 and 7:
List of TablesList of Tables(contin
Page 8 and 9:
List of TablesThis page intentional
Page 10 and 11:
List of FiguresList of Figures(cont
Page 12 and 13:
List of FiguresList of Figures(cont
Page 14 and 15:
AcknowledgementsThis page intention
Page 16 and 17:
Executive Summarymobility options a
Page 18 and 19:
Executive SummaryTable ES.1 Mobilit
Page 20 and 21:
Executive SummaryRecommendations fo
Page 22 and 23:
Executive SummaryThis page intentio
Page 24 and 25:
Introduction(HOV) policies, high-oc
Page 26 and 27:
Introduction1.3 Overview of Work Pr
Page 28 and 29:
IntroductionStudy WebpageThe I-66 M
Page 30 and 31:
IntroductionThis page intentionally
Page 32 and 33:
Mobility OptionsFigure 2.1Issues an
Page 34 and 35:
Mobility OptionsKeeps mobility opti
Page 36 and 37:
Mobility Optionsanticipated to have
Page 38 and 39:
Mobility OptionsTable 2.2 Mobility
Page 40 and 41:
Mobility OptionsFigure 2.2Abbreviat
Page 42 and 43:
Mobility OptionsFigure 2.3Cutline L
Page 44 and 45:
Mobility OptionsFigure 2.4Peak-Hour
Page 46 and 47:
Mobility OptionsTotal VMT in the st
Page 48 and 49:
Mobility OptionsThere is some shift
Page 50 and 51:
Mobility OptionsThe percentage of t
Page 52 and 53:
Mobility OptionsMode share shows no
Page 54 and 55:
Mobility OptionsFigure 2.15 Morning
Page 56 and 57:
Mobility OptionsKey FindingsThis op
Page 58 and 59:
Mobility OptionsFigure 2.17 Interli
Page 60 and 61:
Mobility Options2. Orange Line Bypa
Page 62 and 63:
Mobility OptionsAs travelers make u
Page 64 and 65:
Mobility OptionsTable 2.3 Mobility
Page 66 and 67:
Mobility OptionsThis page intention
Page 68 and 69:
Multimodal PackagesReducing the pro
Page 70 and 71:
Multimodal PackagesTable 3.2 Recomm
Page 72 and 73:
Multimodal PackagesFigure 3.1Travel
Page 74 and 75:
Multimodal PackagesTransit Accessib
Page 76 and 77:
Multimodal PackagesTransportation R
Page 78 and 79:
Multimodal PackagesTable 3.4 CLRP a
Page 80 and 81:
Multimodal PackagesMeasures of Effe
Page 82 and 83:
Multimodal PackagesLevel of Service
Page 84 and 85:
Multimodal PackagesFigure 3.6 CLRP+
Page 86 and 87:
Multimodal PackagesFigure 3.8 CLRP+
Page 88 and 89:
Multimodal Packages3.4 Package 1 -
Page 90 and 91:
Multimodal PackagesFigure 3.12 Pack
Page 92 and 93:
Multimodal PackagesTable 3.5 Packag
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Multimodal PackagesThe tolls would
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Multimodal PackagesCost EstimatesPa
Page 108 and 109:
Multimodal PackagesThis package sho
Page 110 and 111:
Multimodal PackagesLevel of Service
Page 112 and 113: Multimodal PackagesFigure 3.31 Pack
Page 116 and 117: Multimodal Packagesminute limit was
Page 120 and 121: Multimodal PackagesTable 3.12Packag
Page 126 and 127: Multimodal PackagesMultimodal Trave
Page 128 and 129: Multimodal Packagesemerging focus a
Page 130 and 131: Multimodal PackagesDynamic Merge (J
Page 132 and 133: Multimodal PackagesImproved network
Page 134 and 135: Multimodal PackagesMarketing and Ou
Page 136 and 137: Multimodal Packagesround trip usage
Page 138 and 139: Multimodal PackagesTable 3.16 Annua
Page 140 and 141: Multimodal PackagesTable 3.19 TDM 2
Page 142 and 143: Multimodal PackagesTable 3.20 Map K
Page 144 and 145: Multimodal PackagesTable 3.20 Map K
Page 146 and 147: Multimodal PackagesFigure 3.43 Bicy
Page 148 and 149: Multimodal PackagesFigure 3.44 2040
Page 150 and 151: Multimodal PackagesPrioritization o
Page 152 and 153: Multimodal PackagesTable 3.21 2040
Page 154 and 155: Multimodal PackagesCost EstimatesPl
Page 156 and 157: Multimodal PackagesProject lengths
Page 158 and 159: Multimodal PackagesTable 3.24Priori
Page 160 and 161: Multimodal PackagesFigure 3.46 Map
Page 164 and 165: Multimodal PackagesTable 3.26Measur
Page 166 and 167: Multimodal PackagesTable 3.26Measur
Page 168 and 169: Multimodal Packagessensitivity test
Page 170 and 171: Multimodal PackagesTable 3.27 Sensi
Page 172 and 173: Recommendationswill be prudent to p
Page 174 and 175: Recommendationscapacity expansion w
Page 176 and 177: Recommendations(ROW) acquisition, w
Page 178 and 179: Recommendationsachieve the objectiv
Page 180 and 181: Recommendationsto improve mobility
Page 182 and 183: RecommendationsTable 4.1 Multimodal
Page 188 and 189: RecommendationsFigure 4.1 Map of Bi
Page 190 and 191: RecommendationsTable 4.3 Bicycle Pr
Page 192 and 193: Recommendationsand TDM. ICM brings
Page 194 and 195: Potential Funding ApproachesFigure
Page 196 and 197: Potential Funding ApproachesTable 5
Page 200 and 201: Potential Funding Approacheslong-te
Page 204: Potential Funding ApproachesThis pa
show all

I-66 Multimodal Study Final Report - Virginia Department of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?