I-66 Multimodal Study Final Report - Virginia Department of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Mobility OptionsFigure 2.1Issues and Needs Translation to Mobility SolutionsHighwayIssues and Needs1. Westbound roadway congestion2. Eastbound roadway congestion (includeinterchange capacity constraints at theDulles Toll Road)3. Capacity issues at I‐66/arterial interchanges4. Non‐HOV users during HOV operation hoursTransit5. Orange Line Metrorail congestion6. Adverse impact of roadway congestion on bus service7. Challenges to intermodal transfers (rail, bus, bike, car)Bike & Pedestrian8. Bottlenecks on W&OD and Custis Trails9. Limitations/gaps in bicycle and pedestrian accessibilityand connectivityMobility Solutions• I‐66 Capacity Enhancement• Arterial Capacity Enhancement• I‐66 HOT System• HOV Restrictions/Exemptions• ITS/System Operations• Metrorail Level‐of‐Service and Capacity• Bus Transit Level‐of‐Service and Capacity• Intermodal Connections/Station Access• Bike/Pedestrian SystemThe mobility solutions represent a distinct set of corridor implementation objectives thatrespond to the issues and needs in the corridor. The potential mobility options also wereorganized by mode and submode, or transportation system element. The details of thesolutions are listed below.Highway Mobility SolutionsI-66 Capacity Enhancement – Responds to issues and needs statements 1, 2, and 3. Thefocus of this solution is to address congestion on I-66 through capacity enhancements to theI-66 mainline and interchange ramps. Arterial Capacity Enhancement – Responds to issues and needs statements 1, 2, 3, and 6.The focus of this solution is to address arterial capacity bottlenecks through capacityenhancements to major arterials in the I-66 corridor and I-66 interchange improvements.I-66 HOT Lane System – Responds to issues and needs statements 1, 2, 3, and 4. The focusof this solution is to address I-66 congestion through implementation of a HOT lane system. HOV Restrictions/Exemptions – Responds to issues and needs statements 1, 2, 3, and 4.The focus of this solution is to address I-66 congestion by changing HOV rules andupdating or removing other vehicle exemptions on I-66.2-2 I-66 Multimodal Study
Mobility OptionsITS/System Operations – Responds to issues and needs statements 1, 2, and 6. The focus ofthis solution is to address congestion on I-66 and corridor arterials through system operationsand management strategies.Multimodal Transit Mobility Solutions Metrorail Level of Service and Capacity – Responds to issues and needs statements 1, 2,and 5. The focus of this solution is to address overcrowding and mobility constraints on theMetrorail Orange Line through level of service improvements and additional fixedguidewaytransit options in parallel corridors. It is anticipated that significant capacityenhancements to fixed-guideway transit options in the corridor also may positively impactroadway congestion. Bus Transit Level of Service and Capacity – Responds to issues and needs statements 5and 6. The focus of this solution is to address mobility and access limitations to bus serviceand service reliability impacts due to congestion through improving bus level of serviceand operations through on-road infrastructure, technology, and rerouting to optimizeservice.Intermodal Connections – Responds to issues and needs statements 5, 6, 7, and 9. Thefocus of this solution is to address circuitous trips and accessibility barriers throughimproved connections between transit modes (bus to rail), and from bicycle, pedestrian,and auto modes to all transit modes.Bicycle and Pedestrian SolutionsBicycle/Pedestrian System – Responds to issues and needs statements 8 and 9. The focus ofthis solution is to address gaps, barriers, and safety issues in the bicycle and pedestriansystem in the study area and to enhance the overall connectivity and safety of the corecommuting bicycle facilities in the corridor. This is accomplished through improvements totrail crossings of roadways, more direct on and off-road connections to major destinations,and improved on-street bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and signage.Synthesis of Mobility OptionsFollowing development of the broad categories of potential mobility solutions, the next stepwas to define details through a synthesis of the mobility option elements list presented inSection 5.0 of the Interim Report. The identification of the mobility option elements associatedwith each solution requires application of a synthesis process that:Focuses on the alignment of the mobility option elements with the identified issues andneeds;Consolidates related mobility option elements;Keeps mobility option elements that are related to solutions;Ties the mobility option elements to the study area and project goal; andI-66 Multimodal Study 2-3
Page 2 and 3: 20120618
Page 4 and 5: Table of ContentsTable of Contents(
Page 6 and 7: List of TablesList of Tables(contin
Page 8 and 9: List of TablesThis page intentional
Page 10 and 11: List of FiguresList of Figures(cont
Page 12 and 13: List of FiguresList of Figures(cont
Page 14 and 15: AcknowledgementsThis page intention
Page 16 and 17: Executive Summarymobility options a
Page 18 and 19: Executive SummaryTable ES.1 Mobilit
Page 20 and 21: Executive SummaryRecommendations fo
Page 22 and 23: Executive SummaryThis page intentio
Page 24 and 25: Introduction(HOV) policies, high-oc
Page 26 and 27: Introduction1.3 Overview of Work Pr
Page 28 and 29: IntroductionStudy WebpageThe I-66 M
Page 30 and 31: IntroductionThis page intentionally
Page 34 and 35: Mobility OptionsKeeps mobility opti
Page 36 and 37: Mobility Optionsanticipated to have
Page 38 and 39: Mobility OptionsTable 2.2 Mobility
Page 40 and 41: Mobility OptionsFigure 2.2Abbreviat
Page 42 and 43: Mobility OptionsFigure 2.3Cutline L
Page 44 and 45: Mobility OptionsFigure 2.4Peak-Hour
Page 46 and 47: Mobility OptionsTotal VMT in the st
Page 48 and 49: Mobility OptionsThere is some shift
Page 50 and 51: Mobility OptionsThe percentage of t
Page 52 and 53: Mobility OptionsMode share shows no
Page 54 and 55: Mobility OptionsFigure 2.15 Morning
Page 56 and 57: Mobility OptionsKey FindingsThis op
Page 58 and 59: Mobility OptionsFigure 2.17 Interli
Page 60 and 61: Mobility Options2. Orange Line Bypa
Page 62 and 63: Mobility OptionsAs travelers make u
Page 64 and 65: Mobility OptionsTable 2.3 Mobility
Page 66 and 67: Mobility OptionsThis page intention
Page 68 and 69: Multimodal PackagesReducing the pro
Page 70 and 71: Multimodal PackagesTable 3.2 Recomm
Page 72 and 73: Multimodal PackagesFigure 3.1Travel
Page 74 and 75: Multimodal PackagesTransit Accessib
Page 76 and 77: Multimodal PackagesTransportation R
Page 78 and 79: Multimodal PackagesTable 3.4 CLRP a
Page 80 and 81: Multimodal PackagesMeasures of Effe
Page 82 and 83:
Multimodal PackagesLevel of Service
Page 84 and 85:
Multimodal PackagesFigure 3.6 CLRP+
Page 86 and 87:
Multimodal PackagesFigure 3.8 CLRP+
Page 88 and 89:
Multimodal Packages3.4 Package 1 -
Page 90 and 91:
Multimodal PackagesFigure 3.12 Pack
Page 92 and 93:
Multimodal PackagesTable 3.5 Packag
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Multimodal PackagesThe tolls would
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Multimodal PackagesCost EstimatesPa
Page 108 and 109:
Multimodal PackagesThis package sho
Page 110 and 111:
Multimodal PackagesLevel of Service
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Multimodal Packagesminute limit was
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Multimodal PackagesTable 3.12Packag
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Multimodal PackagesMultimodal Trave
Page 128 and 129:
Multimodal Packagesemerging focus a
Page 130 and 131:
Multimodal PackagesDynamic Merge (J
Page 132 and 133:
Multimodal PackagesImproved network
Page 134 and 135:
Multimodal PackagesMarketing and Ou
Page 136 and 137:
Multimodal Packagesround trip usage
Page 138 and 139:
Multimodal PackagesTable 3.16 Annua
Page 140 and 141:
Multimodal PackagesTable 3.19 TDM 2
Page 142 and 143:
Multimodal PackagesTable 3.20 Map K
Page 144 and 145:
Multimodal PackagesTable 3.20 Map K
Page 146 and 147:
Multimodal PackagesFigure 3.43 Bicy
Page 148 and 149:
Multimodal PackagesFigure 3.44 2040
Page 150 and 151:
Multimodal PackagesPrioritization o
Page 152 and 153:
Multimodal PackagesTable 3.21 2040
Page 154 and 155:
Multimodal PackagesCost EstimatesPl
Page 156 and 157:
Multimodal PackagesProject lengths
Page 158 and 159:
Multimodal PackagesTable 3.24Priori
Page 160 and 161:
Multimodal PackagesFigure 3.46 Map
Page 162 and 163:
Multimodal PackagesTable 3.25 Bicyc
Page 164 and 165:
Multimodal PackagesTable 3.26Measur
Page 166 and 167:
Multimodal PackagesTable 3.26Measur
Page 168 and 169:
Multimodal Packagessensitivity test
Page 170 and 171:
Multimodal PackagesTable 3.27 Sensi
Page 172 and 173:
Recommendationswill be prudent to p
Page 174 and 175:
Recommendationscapacity expansion w
Page 176 and 177:
Recommendations(ROW) acquisition, w
Page 178 and 179:
Recommendationsachieve the objectiv
Page 180 and 181:
Recommendationsto improve mobility
Page 182 and 183:
RecommendationsTable 4.1 Multimodal
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
RecommendationsFigure 4.1 Map of Bi
Page 190 and 191:
RecommendationsTable 4.3 Bicycle Pr
Page 192 and 193:
Recommendationsand TDM. ICM brings
Page 194 and 195:
Potential Funding ApproachesFigure
Page 196 and 197:
Potential Funding ApproachesTable 5
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Potential Funding Approacheslong-te
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204:
Potential Funding ApproachesThis pa
show all

I-66 Multimodal Study Final Report - Virginia Department of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?