11.07.2015 Views

A Greater Australia: Population, policies and governance - CEDA

A Greater Australia: Population, policies and governance - CEDA

A Greater Australia: Population, policies and governance - CEDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IntroductionThe importance of good <strong>policies</strong>Immigration brings advantages, but it also carries or accentuates some problems – likecrowding in the capital cities. <strong>Australia</strong>ns can gain from moderate levels of immigrationthat are supported by good settlement arrangements, <strong>and</strong> by an adaptable suiteof good social, environmental <strong>and</strong> economic <strong>policies</strong> – <strong>policies</strong> that are desirable,whatever the level of immigration, <strong>and</strong> whatever the size of the population. Fears ofcrowded <strong>Australia</strong>n communities reflect fears of poor <strong>policies</strong>, since there are manyexamples of countries <strong>and</strong> communities that have prospered with large populations<strong>and</strong> high population growth rates. The more flexible <strong>and</strong> adaptable the economy, <strong>and</strong>the better our government policy settings, then the more likely the benefits of immigrationwill spread widely throughout the <strong>Australia</strong>n population. (<strong>CEDA</strong> is of course notalone in its advocacy of better <strong>policies</strong>: the work of the Productivity Commission mustbe mentioned in this context.)Moreover, there needs to be a feedback loop – if the <strong>Australia</strong>n political system cancope well with the growth in population, then a larger population becomes more desirable.However, if the political system cannot cope well with a growing population, ashas been widely asserted recently, then the rate of immigration should be lower.The “barriers” to improved wellbeing arise mainly from policy <strong>and</strong> institutional restrictions,<strong>and</strong> not, in particular, from deficient water volumes or any insoluble problemsof infrastructure provision. In particular, if we price infrastructure services fairly <strong>and</strong>efficiently, <strong>and</strong> facilitate the appropriate investment <strong>and</strong> associated finance, we cansustain <strong>and</strong> increase the average living st<strong>and</strong>ards of <strong>Australia</strong>ns.The economics of population growthBy 2050, the <strong>Australia</strong>n population will have increased substantially, <strong>and</strong> could wellreach 40 million or more – barring catastrophes, <strong>and</strong> assuming a realistic rate of immigration– <strong>and</strong> it will be a significantly older population.As a practical matter, population policy in <strong>Australia</strong> boils down to immigration policy.The great bulk of immigrants to <strong>Australia</strong> are not admitted under family reunion orhumanitarian grounds, but chiefly for economic reasons: their presence should increasethe wellbeing of the existing <strong>Australia</strong>n population. Who gains <strong>and</strong> who loses from economicimmigration is the focus of Chapter 4.1, by Jonathan Pincus <strong>and</strong> Judith Sloan.The st<strong>and</strong>ard case for admitting moderate levels of “economic” immigration to <strong>Australia</strong>can be summed up this way: “economic” immigration greatly benefits the optionalimmigrants; it may bring overall benefits (or at worst does little harm) to the existing<strong>Australia</strong>n population generally; but some sections of the existing population can besignificantly disadvantaged, depending on how the related <strong>policies</strong> are h<strong>and</strong>led.However, the case for a larger immigration program may be understated. Mosteconomic modelling of the effects of immigration ignores the possibility that a largerpopulation would itself raise productivity (through economies of scale <strong>and</strong> scope), <strong>and</strong>may stimulate innovation. Countries with very low population growth can face majorchallenges <strong>and</strong> miss the flexibility from mobile injections of new migrant populations<strong>and</strong> a growing natural-born workforce. The relative youth, experience <strong>and</strong> diversitybrought through immigration programs greatly enhances flexibility in a growing <strong>and</strong>changing <strong>Australia</strong>, an <strong>Australia</strong> with current city <strong>and</strong> rural densities far below successful<strong>and</strong> rich foreign economies.A <strong>Greater</strong> <strong>Australia</strong>: <strong>Population</strong>, Policies <strong>and</strong> Governance8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!