133ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: Suppl. 1, 133–140 Z<strong>vo</strong>len (Slovakia), 2007THE VARIATIONS OF 222 RN ACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONIN BOREHOLE WATER – A COMPARISON BETWEENTHE FIRST HALVES OF 2006 AND 2007Iveta Smetanová 1 − Karol Holý 2 – Monika Müllerová 2 – Anna Polášková 21Geofyzikálny ústav, Slovenská akadémia vied, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 28 Bratislava, e-mail: geofivas@savba.sk2Katedra jadrovej fyziky a biofyziky, Fakulta matematiky, fyziky a informatiky, Univerzita Komenského,Mlynská dolina F1, 842 48 Bratislava, e-mail: holy@fmph.uniba.skABSTRACTSmetanová I., Holý K., Müllerová M. & Polášková M. The Variations of 222 Rn Activity Concentrationin Borehole Water – a Comparison between the First Halves of 2006 and 2007Three boreholes V-1 (10 m),V-2 (40 m) and V-3 (10 m) have been drilled in the Lower Triassic quartziteat the area of Astronomical and Geophysical Observatory in Modra-Piesok. Since January 2006 thesampling of borehole water has been performed three times per week for the 222 Rn activity concentrationanalyses. Radon concentration in water has been studied in comparison to the water level changes inthe boreholes, the precipitation amount and the height of snow cover. The variations of 222 Rn activityconcentration in borehole water measured since January to July in 2006 have been compared with thosemeasured in the same period in 2007. It was observed that radon concentrations in V-1 and V-3 boreholeswere changing when the precipitation amount was more than 20 mm in both years of thestudy. A similarvariation was recorded in the state of water level in those boreholes. The effect of the precipitation was notobserved in V-2 borehole for both periods of our research. The melting snow caused the increase of waterlevel and the decrease of radon concentration in all three boreholes. The courses of water level and thevalues of 222 Rn activity concentration were not the same for compared months, because of the significantlylower precipitation amount in 2007.Key words: radon activity concentration, borehole, precipitation, water level, snow coverINTRODUCTIONRadon concentration in underground water dependson many factors, mainly on the uranium contentand mineral composition of surrounding rockenvironment and on radium dissolved in undergroundwater. The diameter of connected fracturesin rock massif, the possibility for radon degassingfrom water and also the hydrodynamic factors, thatcontrol the mobility of underground water, influencethe radon content in water [1, 2].Underground water can move through rock viaconnected crack and fissures of various diameters.The position of the underground water level is notstable. The continuous flow of groundwater to thevalley results in a general lowering of water levelexcept after the periods of significant precipitation.The seasonal rise of water level during wintermonths is observed due to the slight of evapotranspiration[3]During the seasonal falling stage of the watertable, some of the radon dissolved in water of thelarge fractures likely remains in the water as it recedesto a lower position. Much of the radon revertsto vapor in the interconnecting fractures when waterdrains down. Radon clinging to fracture walls isfree to move as the water moves out and also radonthat was held in pores that are too small for waterto penetrate can now move out into the larger air--filled fractures. As the water table rises seasonally,
134the airborne radon is pushed upward and outward.A large amount of precipitation may cause a rise ofthe water level and entrapment of air with an airborneradon by the downward infiltrating water [3].In this paper we present the results of radonconcentration monitoring in water from boreholes.We will compare the interdependence among thevariations of 222 Rn activity concentration in boreholewater and water level changes with precipitationfrom January to July in both years 2006 and2007 of our investigation.METHODSThree boreholes V-1 (10 m), V-2 (40 m) and V-3 (10 m) have been drilled at the area of Astronomicaland Geophysical Observatory of ComeniusUniversity in Modra-Piesok (AGO Modra) in theLittle Carpathian Mts (40 km NE from Bratislava).The inner diameter of those boreholes is 80 mm,they are cased with a PVC pipe with 10 % perforationalong the whole length. All of them have beendrilled in the Lower Triassic quartzites folded inthe granodiorite of the Modra massif [4, 5].Since August 2003 the investigation of radonconcentration in borehole air has been performedin V-2 and V-3 borehole [6]. The continual monitoringof the atmospheric temperature is also performedin Modra AGO from 2003 [6]. Since 2006the study of the 222 Rn activity concentration changesin borehole water has been performed in all threeboreholes [7].The sampling of water from boreholes has beencarried out regularly three times a week by plasticbottle. Simultaneously the state of water level hasbeen measured. The 222 Rn activity concentrationanalyses have been executed at the laboratory ofthe Department of Nuclear Physics and Biophysicsat Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informaticsof Comenius University in Bratislava. The scintillationcell of Lucas type DS 401M with <strong>vo</strong>lume125 ml have been used for the measurements ofradon concentration in water [8].The precipitation amount and the height ofsnow cover have been regularly measured at theobservatory and which was kindly available for ourinvestigation.RESULTSIn this paper were studied the results obtainedfrom January to July (respectively to Augustin the case of V-1 borehole) for two years of theinvestigation of 222 Rn activity concentration in boreholewater at AGO Modra. This time period wasselected to comparise of the results because sincesummer there is no water in V-1 and V-3 boreholeeach year.It is interesting and very useful, that those twoyears of our research were completely different forthe sake of different atmospheric temperature, precipitationamount and height of snow cover (Fig. 1).Generally, in 2006 the winter temperatures weresignificantly lower than in 2007. Equally the precipitationamount in winter and spring months washigher in comparison with 2007. Since January toMarch the study area was covered by a permanentthick layer of snow in 2006. On the contrary, therewas almost no snow in 2007. Those different conditionsallowed us to compare the courses of radonconcentration in borehole water and the changes ofwater level in diverse situations.Average monthly temperature2520 2006 2007151050-51 2 3 4 5 6 7monthtemperature [ o C]Precipitation amount1501209060300precipitation[mm]2006 20071 2 3 4 5 6 7monthFig. 1 The comparison between the average monthly atmospheric temperature and the precipitation amountat AGO Modra for the years 2006 and 2007
- Page 2 and 3:
Acta FacultatisEcologiaeJournal of
- Page 4 and 5:
OBSAH / CONTENTSISOL M., MICHALÍKO
- Page 6:
5ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: Sup
- Page 12:
11ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: Su
- Page 18 and 19:
17ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: Su
- Page 20 and 21:
19are lower in ill patients compare
- Page 22:
21are considered as the most accura
- Page 25 and 26:
24- multimode cavities are usually
- Page 27 and 28:
26the load during its exposure to f
- Page 29 and 30:
28Tradescantia paludosa 02 test and
- Page 31 and 32:
30Tab. 5: Results of positive contr
- Page 34 and 35:
33ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: Su
- Page 36 and 37:
35DISCUSSIONThe ionising radiation
- Page 38 and 39:
37ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: Su
- Page 40 and 41:
39222Rn is produced by radioactive
- Page 42 and 43:
41180160140this reason we also pick
- Page 44:
435001450400350hKz0,8h [m]300250200
- Page 47 and 48:
46deposit is that stripped in off-l
- Page 49 and 50:
48TruenessTrueness was determined i
- Page 51 and 52:
50MATERIAL AND METHODSChloroform (p
- Page 53 and 54:
52absorbance [a.u.]1,000,750,500,25
- Page 55 and 56:
54Tab. 1: Rrequirements determinati
- Page 57 and 58:
56Methods of VOC testing were set a
- Page 60 and 61:
59Tab. 6: ContinuedSamples withsurf
- Page 62 and 63:
61ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: Su
- Page 64 and 65:
63One of the possible explanations
- Page 66 and 67:
65Ai - Ai-1 [Bq.m -3 ]86420-2-4-6-8
- Page 68 and 69:
67ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 15: Su
- Page 70 and 71:
69BiodegradabilityThe great variety
- Page 72 and 73:
71degradation starts of late days,
- Page 74 and 75:
73Fig. 4 Treated (after 28 days of
- Page 76:
75parameters of the cutting process
- Page 80 and 81:
79Fraction: D (residual rest) prese
- Page 82:
81was not confirmed. Maximum of mer
- Page 85 and 86: 84Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of atomi
- Page 87 and 88: 86Alpha spectrometryAlpha spectrome
- Page 89 and 90: 8880007000y = 6622xR 2 = 0.939SIMS
- Page 92 and 93: 91ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: Su
- Page 94 and 95: 93Gemer according to the German mod
- Page 96 and 97: 95Tab. 1 Results of the chemical an
- Page 98 and 99: 97Continuation of Tab. 2 Results of
- Page 100 and 101: 99Vlčia Dolina and from the reserv
- Page 102 and 103: 101ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: S
- Page 104 and 105: 103mg.dm -3mg.dm -35,004,003,002,00
- Page 106 and 107: 105year and the average value repre
- Page 108 and 109: 107ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: S
- Page 110 and 111: 109Sample site 1 Sample site 2 Samp
- Page 112 and 113: 111As for the sampling time (Fig. 5
- Page 114 and 115: 113ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: S
- Page 116 and 117: 115Typha latifolia, Carex sp., Scir
- Page 118 and 119: 117conditions for decomposition of
- Page 120 and 121: 119ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: S
- Page 122 and 123: 121from the background (derived fro
- Page 124 and 125: 12311. PETROVSKÝ, E., ELWOOD, B.:
- Page 126 and 127: 125ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: S
- Page 128 and 129: 1272.52.0Correlation coefficient 0,
- Page 130 and 131: 129ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: S
- Page 132 and 133: 131RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONTable 2 gi
- Page 136 and 137: 135V-1 BOREHOLEThe courses of 222 R
- Page 138 and 139: 137AV-2 (40m) 2006A ( 222 Rn) [kBq/
- Page 140 and 141: 139soaks into the soil, another par
- Page 142 and 143: 141ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: S
- Page 144 and 145: 143Fig. 2 The continuous monitoring
- Page 146 and 147: 145Indoor radon activity concentrat
- Page 148 and 149: 147ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: S
- Page 150 and 151: 149Fig. 1 Podlipa dump-fieldCanada)
- Page 152 and 153: 151concentrations of Fe. Cu. Cd. Ni
- Page 154 and 155: 153DUMP-FIELDREFERENCE SITEppm15001
- Page 156 and 157: 155Fig. 5 Compression of wood forma
- Page 158 and 159: 157decrease in the following order:
- Page 160 and 161: 159ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: S
- Page 162 and 163: 161SPECIFIC EXAMPLES OFFACTORS THAT
- Page 164 and 165: 163ACTA FACULTATIS ECOLOGIAE, 16: S
- Page 166 and 167: 165The methods developed to incorpo
- Page 168 and 169: 167The effects of wind on ozone con
- Page 170 and 171: 169Fig. 6 Mean total and stomatal f
- Page 172 and 173: 171transport modelling in North Ame
- Page 175: Acta Facultatis Ecologiae, Volume 1