equired to bring the railway back to a reasonable operating standard. The government of Tanzania hadconcessioned the line in 2007 to get it restored to full operations. However, the concession failed andwas cancelled in early 2011. The low volumes of traffic were compounded by a lack of confidence in therailway operator, which resulted in guarantees necessary for financing for rehabilitation being held back.Though there is now a regionally sponsored proposal to introduce a new standard gauge railwayto replace or supplement the existing one, in the medium term the prospects for a rail basedcorridor operation lie in rehabilitating the TRL line. The Government of Tanzania is currentlyworking with the World Bank on a project for such revival of the line. The risk in the short term is thatessential maintenance of the existing systems will be further neglected in the enthusiasm to shift to thenew system. It is also worth acknowledging that the rail based central Corridor option is about costsavings much more than it s about time. When it is operational train turnaround time is 17 days, with atariff of US$0.065 per tkm. An operational model (Nathan Associates 2011) has indicated that ifturnaround time was reduced to 7 days, traffic could be increased to 1.5mtpa (the level reached in 1994),and tariffs could fall to less than US$0.05 per tkm. This underscores the link mentioned above betweenscale and costs.6.1.3 Lake TanganyikaFreight traffic volumes on Lake Tanganyika using the combination rail/lake are currently verylow. Except for some trade with Mpulungu in Zambia, and aid shipments for the DRC through Kigoma,most of the DRC and all of the Tanzanian flagged vessels operate on cabotage routes (i.e. between portsor landing places in their own territorial waters). While existing capacity is able to meet the currentdepressed level of lake transport demand, this generally involves considerable delay and long cargodwell time in the lake ports of origin.The current fleet operating on Lake Tanganyika is particularly small. A recent study for the CentralCorridor development identified 23 vessels operating on the lake, of which 56.5 percent were 50 years orolder and six were laid up or inoperable. There were no fully cellular container vessels, dry bulk orRoRo vessels operating on Lake Tanganyika, and trade is currently dominated by privately ownedBurundian flagged vessels sailing on north-south routes. There are eight dry cargo barges in the fleet,two of which have a total cargo capacity of 1,014 tons. In addition, there are three general cargo vesselswith a total capacity of 1,500 tons, and three combo carriers with a total capacity of 74 TEUs 96 wereavailable for handling general or container cargo. This fleet would however not be able to meet a futureincrease of transport demand, especially if there is container transport demand driven by increasing GDPgrowth and/or growth realized through increased port efficiency (especially vessel turn-around time) andrailway performance.Bujumbura port is relatively better equipped than other ports on the lake. Bujumbura is the soleport that has the capacity for handling lift-on lift-off (LoLo) containers in the northern part of the lake. Ingeneral, of the six major ports on the lake, only Bujumbura has made a major investment in the portinfrastructure in the last two and a half decades. The main quay, which was built between 1939 and1957, was rehabilitated in 1990 (the 100 m wide apron was resurfaced in concrete and new crane railsand bollards were installed). In addition, the 50 year old rail mounted derrick cranes were rehabilitated in2001. The only other infrastructure project under way is the dredging of the Port of Kigoma and therehabilitation of its slip ways. In September 2010, the Port of Kigoma got a new mobile harbor cranecapable of handling containers. However, the design and age of the wharf limits its effective use to lessthan 100 m of the quay.96 The vessels have capacities of 14, 24 and 36 TEU.100 / 153
The Central Corridor is potentially very attractive for transit traffic. The main reasons for this arethat: (i) customs arrangements are less costly, simpler and less restrictive; (ii) the number of transitcountries is kept to a minimum; (iii) management and labor are more flexible at Dar; and (iv) directtransport costs are significantly lower for Burundi. However there are capacity constraints imposed bythe Tanzanian railway company TRL. The Kigoma and Isaka routes are potentially the lowest costtransit alternatives for Burundi and Rwanda, but they are crucially dependent on an adequate level of railservice through Tanzania.6.2 Northern CorridorThe Northern Corridor comprises the transport facilities and infrastructure linking landlockedcountries of East and Central Africa, namely Burundi, D.R. Congo, Rwanda and Uganda, to thesea port of Mombasa in Kenya. The corridor also serves Northern Tanzania, Southern Sudan andEthiopia. The main route available for Burundi traffic is the road passing through Rwanda, Uganda andKenya, over a distance of about 1,990 km between Bujumbura and Mombasa. The corridor thereforeconnects most of the East African Community, and also links the EAC to states on its periphery (Sudan,DRC and Ethiopia). Beside roads, it has lake and railway combinations that form its constituent parts. Itsstrategic role derives from the importance of the Port of Mombasa to the region.A number of road rehabilitation projects along the corridor are in various stages of development.There are also plans to improve the road network further from Uganda to South Sudan, as well as toextend the pipeline from Eldoret in Kenya, where it currently ends, to Kampala and further to Kigali.Uganda is expected to start exporting oil soon, which could lead to these extensions moving Ugandafrom the periphery of the pipeline network to its hub. Also planned is an expansion of the Port ofMombasa and an upgrade to the railway network. In fact, the approach to the railway that forms part ofthe Northern Corridor is probably the most illustrative example of a regional approach to infrastructuredevelopment and management.Uganda is connected to Kenya in general, and to Mombasa in particular, by a railway line, whichcould be accessed by Burundi. The whole network is narrow gauge (1000mm) system, similar to theTRL system on the Central Corridor. In the mid-2000s the governments of Kenya and Uganda jointlyconcessioned the system to a private operator. The objective of the concession was to improve themanagement, operational and financial performances of the two railway systems by granting exclusiverights to the concession companies for the provision of freight services in both Kenya and Uganda forthe duration of the concession term. However, the process has been difficult and has not yielded thedesired results, in terms of traffic growth of the railway system and increased investment in track androlling stock. As a result, the Northern Corridor carries only about 1.5 mpta, down from 2 mtpa in2005/6, or less than 5% of the container volumes handled through the Port of Mombasa. The servicefrom Mombasa to Nairobi takes 19 to 24 hours, while the service from Nairobi to Kampala takes 6 days.Relative rail prices are $590/TEU to Nairobi and $2,500/TEU to Kampala, reflecting the long transittimes. Bulk tariffs from Mombasa to Kampala are $120/ton by road and $80/ton by rail.Based on the above, the Northern Corridor therefore hardly serves as a low cost or more reliablealternative for Burundi traffic. The Central Corridor has a distinct comparative advantage over allmode combinations on the Northern Corridor.6.3 Southern CorridorThe Southern corridor has gained in importance in recent years. The route Mpulungu-Bujumbura onLake Tanganyika, was developed mainly for cement and sugar shipments from Southern Africa toBurundi and, to a much lesser extent, Rwanda. The route carries little or no overseas trade. The potentialof the route is reflected by looking at the trade volumes for 2011. A total of 681,790 tons was imported,including 134,046 tons from Tanzania, 92,291 tons from Zambia and 12,566 tons from South Africa.101 / 153
- Page 1 and 2:
Republic of Burundi / Enhanced Inte
- Page 3 and 4:
Currency equivalent(Exchange rate a
- Page 5 and 6:
Executive summaryThe Government of
- Page 7 and 8:
Dar es Salaam (Tanzania) and Mombas
- Page 9 and 10:
II.3. Unorganized (agricultural) as
- Page 11 and 12:
making. Efforts to improve official
- Page 13 and 14:
Identified constraintregulatory fra
- Page 15 and 16:
Identified constraintProposed Actio
- Page 17 and 18:
(% GDP)50%40%30%20%10%Figure 1.2: e
- Page 19 and 20:
Burundi’s very narrow export base
- Page 21 and 22:
elatively well diversified - in 200
- Page 23 and 24:
ExportsImports(%)Share2001/03Share2
- Page 25 and 26:
Table 1.4 : Burundi’s trade in se
- Page 27 and 28:
scope for both automatic and discre
- Page 29 and 30:
exports. Burundi stands out as a he
- Page 31 and 32:
this, the Government has elaborated
- Page 33 and 34:
4,000Figure 1.11a: cost to export (
- Page 35 and 36:
The improvement of Burundi’s Doin
- Page 37 and 38:
Mainstreaming of trade into nationa
- Page 39 and 40:
constraints are required to impleme
- Page 41 and 42:
CHAPTER 2 - Regional integration: o
- Page 43 and 44:
4.3 percent to SSA as a whole. Most
- Page 45 and 46:
likely to facilitate deeper integra
- Page 47 and 48:
collection remain destination-based
- Page 49 and 50: To-date, the approach to eliminateN
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 2.5: Improvements in doing b
- Page 53 and 54: Public awareness and stakeholders s
- Page 55 and 56: CHAPTER 3 - Export diversificationT
- Page 57 and 58: products, Figure 3.3 shows that Bur
- Page 59 and 60: Second, measures that encourage the
- Page 61 and 62: Figure 3.5: Burundian coffee value
- Page 63 and 64: ii. Addressing supply-side constrai
- Page 65 and 66: sales of specialty coffee by cooper
- Page 67 and 68: long distances, given the high cost
- Page 69 and 70: The over exploitation of land is of
- Page 71 and 72: logistics chain. Other types of fac
- Page 73 and 74: CHAPTER 4 - Non-tariff Measures: Th
- Page 75 and 76: Figure 4.1: Coverage and frequency
- Page 77 and 78: Some of the most heavily regulated
- Page 79 and 80: 2.2 Severity: the impact of NTMsWhi
- Page 81 and 82: In spite of efforts to improve the
- Page 83 and 84: standards, which kindly share the m
- Page 85 and 86: According to a testimony gathered i
- Page 87 and 88: public sectors would have more clou
- Page 89 and 90: CHAPTER 5 - Strengthening Trade Fac
- Page 91 and 92: ii. designing a program of action o
- Page 93 and 94: 3. Size of ShipmentsThe small avera
- Page 95 and 96: makes it possible for the coffee to
- Page 97 and 98: logistics services on the other. Ty
- Page 99: Table 5.3: Characteristics of Clear
- Page 103 and 104: Air connectivity, while limited in
- Page 105 and 106: Kigoma and Bujumbura lake ports. Th
- Page 107 and 108: In its Strategic Plan 2011-2015, th
- Page 109 and 110: increase reliability would therefor
- Page 111 and 112: 8. RecommendationsThe foregoing sho
- Page 113 and 114: Cooperation at the regional level a
- Page 115 and 116: (BIF billion) (%)1. Primary sector
- Page 117 and 118: A striking feature of Burundi’s s
- Page 119 and 120: Business servicesNumber of accounta
- Page 121 and 122: At the same time there exist severa
- Page 123 and 124: Under the capacity building compone
- Page 125 and 126: MadagascarCameroonSenegalKenyaMalaw
- Page 127 and 128: Explaining the Segmentation of Mark
- Page 129 and 130: . Adequate regulations that ensure
- Page 131 and 132: The pace of integration is largely
- Page 133 and 134: take time to overcome, are likely t
- Page 135 and 136: and to domestic travel spending, as
- Page 137 and 138: the attractiveness of the sector fo
- Page 139 and 140: 4. The challenges facing tourism in
- Page 141 and 142: supply, hospitals), and in large-sc
- Page 143 and 144: durable improvements in terms of st
- Page 145 and 146: - the introduction of a single EAC
- Page 147 and 148: Box 7.4: Examples of regional conse
- Page 149 and 150: cultural and social sustainability
- Page 151 and 152:
ICG. 2012. Burundi: A Deepening Cor
- Page 153:
World Bank. 2010c. Reform and Regio