01.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20040070896 Lockheed Martin Space Operations, Bay Saint Louis, MS, USA<br />

Dynamic Analysis of a Building Under Rocket Engine Plume Acoustic Load<br />

Qian, Z.; VanDyke, D.; Wright, S.; Redmond, M.; July 09, 2001; 11 pp.; In English; 37th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint<br />

Propulsion Conference <strong>and</strong> Exhibit, 9-10 Jul. 2001, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Original contains black <strong>and</strong> white illustrations<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): NAS13-650; SWR H308A22200<br />

Report No.(s): AIAA Paper 2001-3526; SE 2001-06-00029-SSC; Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Studies have been performed to develop finite-element modeling <strong>and</strong> simulation techniques to predict the dynamic<br />

structural response of Building 4010 to the acoustic load from the plume of high-thrust rocket motors. The building is the Test<br />

Control Center <strong>and</strong> general office space for the E-complex at Stennis Space Center. It is a large single span; light-structured<br />

building located approximately 1,000 feet from the E-1 test st<strong>and</strong>. A three-dimensional shell/beam combined model of the<br />

building was built using Pro/Engineer platform <strong>and</strong> imported into Pro/Mechanica for analysis. An Equivalent Shell technique<br />

was developed to simplify the highly complex building structure so that the calculation is more efficient <strong>and</strong> accurate. A<br />

deterministic approach was used for the dynamic analysis. A pre-stressed modal analysis was performed to simulate the weight<br />

stiffening of the structure, through which about 200 modes ranging from 0 to 35 Hz were identified. In an initial dynamic<br />

frequency analysis, the maximum response over the model was found. Then the complete 3-D distributions of the<br />

displacement, as well as the stresses, were calculated through a final frequency analysis. The results were compared to a strain<br />

gage <strong>and</strong> accelerometer recordings from rocket engine tests <strong>and</strong> showed reasonable agreement.<br />

Author<br />

Buildings; Test Facilities; Dynamic Response; Engine Tests; Acoustics; Loads (Forces); Rocket Engines; Dynamic Structural<br />

Analysis<br />

20040070935 <strong>NASA</strong> Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />

Test <strong>and</strong> Analysis Correlation of Form Impact onto Space Shuttle Wing Leading Edge RCC Panel 8<br />

Fasanella, Edwin L.; Lyle, Karen H.; Gabrys, Jonathan; Melis, Matthew; Carney, Kelly; March 05, 2004; 12 pp.; In English;<br />

8th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, 2-4 May 2004, Dearborn, MI, USA; Original contains black <strong>and</strong> white<br />

illustrations; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Soon after the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) began their study of the space shuttle Columbia accident,<br />

&quot;physics-based&quot; analyses using LS-DYNA were applied to characterize the expected damage to the Reinforced<br />

Carbon-Carbon (RCC) leading edge from high-speed foam impacts. Forensic evidence quickly led CAIB investigators to<br />

concentrate on the left wing leading edge RCC panels. This paper will concentrate on the test of the left-wing RCC panel 8<br />

conducted at Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) <strong>and</strong> the correlation with an LS-DYNA analysis. The successful correlation<br />

of the LS-DYNA model has resulted in the use of LS-DYNA as a predictive tool for characterizing the threshold of damage<br />

for impacts of various debris such as foam, ice, <strong>and</strong> ablators onto the RCC leading edge for shuttle return-to-flight.<br />

Author<br />

Accident Investigation; Carbon-Carbon Composites; Leading Edges; Impact Damage; Space Shuttle Orbiters; Finite Element<br />

Method<br />

20040070940 <strong>NASA</strong> Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />

The Use of LS-DYNA in the Columbia Accident Investigation <strong>and</strong> Return to Flight Activities<br />

Gabrys, Jonathan; Schatz, Josh; Carney, Kelly; Melis, Matthew; Fasanella, Edwin L.; Lyle, Karen H.; [2004]; 10 pp.; In<br />

English; 8th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, 2-4 May 2004, Dearborn, MI, USA; Original contains color <strong>and</strong> black<br />

<strong>and</strong> white illustrations; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />

During the launch of the Space Shuttle Columbia on January 16, 2003, foam originating from the external tank impacted<br />

the shuttle’s left wing 81 seconds after lift-off. Then on February 1st, Space Shuttle Columbia broke-up during re-entry. In<br />

the weeks that followed, the Columbia Accident Investigation Board had formed various teams to investigate every aspect of<br />

the tragedy. One of these teams was the Impact Analysis Team, which was asked to investigate the foam impact on the wing<br />

leading edge. This paper will describe the approach <strong>and</strong> methodology used by the team to support the accident investigation,<br />

<strong>and</strong> more specifically the use of LS-DYNA for analyzing the foam impact event. Due to the success of the analytical<br />

predictions, the impact analysis team has also been asked to support Return to Flight activities. These activities will analyze<br />

a far broader range of impact events, but not with just foam <strong>and</strong> not only on the wing leading edge. The debris list has<br />

exp<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> so have the possible impact locations. This paper will discuss the Return to Flight activities <strong>and</strong> the use of<br />

LS-DYNA to support them.<br />

Author<br />

Accident Investigation; Spacecraft Reentry; Impact Damage; Leading Edges; Finite Element Method; Computerized<br />

Simulation<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!