01.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in the W we use the SOHO/SUMER spectrograph to take a time series of exposures from a single pointing position, providing<br />

a measurement of spectral line properties as a function of time <strong>and</strong> position along the slit. temperatures from 80,000 - 1.6<br />

million K. These measurements are combined with TRACE movies in transition region <strong>and</strong> coronal temperature b<strong>and</strong>s to<br />

obtain more complete information concerning prominence structure <strong>and</strong> motions. The resulting observations allow us to<br />

analyze the thermal <strong>and</strong> kinetic energy of the moving prominence sources as functions of time.<br />

Author<br />

Coronas; Line Spectra; Plasmas (Physics); Solar Prominences; Thermal Energy; Thermodynamic Properties<br />

20040070946 <strong>NASA</strong> Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, USA<br />

Modern Solar Mysteries<br />

Hathaway, David H.; [2004]; 1 pp.; In English; No Copyright; Avail: Other Sources; Abstract Only<br />

100 years ago we thought that the Sun <strong>and</strong> stars shone as a result of slow gravitational contraction over a few tens of<br />

millions of years - putting astronomers at odds with geologists who claimed that the Earth was much, much older. That<br />

mystery was solved in the 1920s <strong>and</strong> 30s with the discovery of nuclear energy (proving that the geologists had it right all<br />

along). Other scientific mysteries concerning the Sun have come <strong>and</strong> gone but three major mysteries remain: 1) How does the<br />

Sun produce sunspots with an 11-year cycle? 2) What produces the huge explosions that result in solar flares, prominence<br />

eruptions, <strong>and</strong> coronal mass ejections? <strong>and</strong> 3) Why is the Sun’s outer atmosphere, the corona, so darned hot? Recent progress<br />

in solar astronomy reveals a single key to underst<strong>and</strong>ing all three of these mysteries.<br />

Author<br />

Sun; Astronomy; Solar Atmosphere; Solar Physics<br />

20040071040 <strong>NASA</strong> Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, USA<br />

Recent Progress in Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the Sun’s Magnetic Dynamo<br />

Hathaway, David. H.; 2004; 1 pp.; In English; No Copyright; Avail: Other Sources; Abstract Only<br />

100 years ago we thought that the Sun <strong>and</strong> stars shone as a result of slow gravitational contraction over a few tens of<br />

millions of years - putting astronomers at odds with geologists who claimed that the Earth was much, much older. That<br />

mystery was solved in the 1920s <strong>and</strong> 30s with the discovery of nuclear energy (proving that the geologists had it right all<br />

along). Other scientific mysteries concerning the Sun have come <strong>and</strong> gone but three major mysteries remain: 1) How does the<br />

Sun produce sunspots with an 11-year cycle? 2) What produces the huge explosions that result in solar flares, prominence<br />

eruptions, <strong>and</strong> coronal mass ejections? <strong>and</strong> 3) Why is the Sun’s outer atmosphere, the corona, so darned hot? Recent progress<br />

in solar astronomy reveals a single key to underst<strong>and</strong>ing all three of these mysteries.The 11-year time scale for the sunspot<br />

cycle indicates the presence of a magnetic dynamo within the Sun. For decades this dynamo was though to operate within the<br />

Sun’s convection zone - the outmost 30% of the Sun where convective currents transport heat <strong>and</strong> advect magnetic lines of<br />

force. The two leading theories for the dynamo had very different models for the dynamics of the convection zone. Actual<br />

measurements of the dynamics using the techniques of helioseismology showed that both of these models had to be wrong<br />

some 20 years ago. A thin layer of strongly sheared flow at the base of the convection zone (now called the tachocline) was<br />

then taken to be the seat of the dynamo. Over the last 10 years it has become apparent that a weak meridional circulation within<br />

the convection zone also plays a key role in the dynamo. This meridional circulation has plasma rising up from the tachocline<br />

in the equatorial regions, spreading out toward the poles at a top speed of about 10-20 m/s at the surface, sinking back down<br />

to the tachocline in the polar regions, <strong>and</strong> then flowing back toward the equator at a top speed of about 1-2 m/s in the tachocline<br />

itself. Recent dynamo models that include this meridional flow now appear to have some power for predicting the size of<br />

future sunspot cycles.<br />

Author<br />

Coronas; Sun; Sunspots; Solar Magnetic Field<br />

20040073450 <strong>NASA</strong> Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA<br />

Thermal <strong>and</strong> Nonthermal Contributions to the Solar Flare X-Ray Flux<br />

Dennis, Brian R.; Phillips, K. J. H.; Sylwester, Janusz; Sylwester, Barbara; Schwartz, Richard A.; Tolbert, A. Kimberley, et<br />

al.; [2004]; 1 pp.; In English; COSPAR (Committee on Space Research), 16 Jul. - 1 Aug. 2004, Paris, France; No Copyright;<br />

Avail: Other Sources; Abstract Only<br />

The relative thermal <strong>and</strong> nonthermal contributions to the total energy budget of a solar flare are being determined through<br />

analysis of RHESSI X-ray imaging <strong>and</strong> spectral observations in the energy range from approx. 5 to approx. 50 keV. The classic<br />

ways of differentiating between the thermal <strong>and</strong> nonthermal components - exponential vs. sources - can now be combined for<br />

330

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!