01.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of interacting with others while working is a primary need. The second type of change is ‘technical.’ It involves making<br />

measurable modifications to the phystcal routines of a job. Federal Express Corporation’s recent experiences in introducing<br />

massive technical change is the subject of this presentation. The principal focus will be on the actions taken by the Company’s<br />

management to ensure acceptance of new technology which significantly affected the day-to-day activities of its 12,000<br />

courier workforce.<br />

Author<br />

Social Factors; Upgrading; Industrial Management; Technologies<br />

20040070857 Matsushita Industrial Corp., Fraklin Park, IL, USA<br />

Japanese Management in US<br />

Kraft, Richard A.; <strong>NASA</strong> Symposium on Productivity <strong>and</strong> Quality: Strategies for Improving Operations in Government <strong>and</strong><br />

Industry; [1984], pp. 187-190; In English; See also 20040070839; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A01, Hardcopy<br />

Japanese manufacturers are gaining worldwide recognition for their outst<strong>and</strong>ing quality <strong>and</strong> productivity achievement in<br />

many industries. Japanese management techniques have frequently been identified as a main contributor to this<br />

accomplishment. Matsushita has achieved a notable result in the reconstruction of a television manufacturing operation which<br />

it purchased in 1974, located in Franklin Park, Illinois. This company today is a profitable, high quality producer of television<br />

products <strong>and</strong> microwave ovens, after a history of losses prior to its acquisition. Certain Japanese management practices have<br />

been identified as making a significant contribution to this improvement including: I. Management focus on product, rather<br />

than on other business activities designed to show short term gains without substantive contribution to improve the product,<br />

process or people. 2. Management patience to accept <strong>and</strong> support long term plans. 3. Management focus on cooperation, rather<br />

than on confrontation, to facilitate smooth operations <strong>and</strong> smooth relationships between all participants in the business system.<br />

4. Management attention to detail, but not inundation in detail. Much mere analysis <strong>and</strong> study is carried on by the employees<br />

to clarify the meaning of the detail. 5. Management’s will to study <strong>and</strong> learn, from all available sources, <strong>and</strong> to apply or adapt<br />

the information in a disciplined system. 6. Conduct of managerial activities under the guidance of clearly defined <strong>and</strong><br />

consistent corporate philosophy.<br />

Author<br />

Management Methods; Japan<br />

20040070858 General Dynamics Corp., Fort Worth, TX, USA<br />

Modernization in <strong>Aerospace</strong><br />

Rogers, Herbert F.; <strong>NASA</strong> Symposium on Productivity <strong>and</strong> Quality: Strategies for Improving Operations in Government <strong>and</strong><br />

Industry; [1984], pp. 43-48; In English; See also 20040070839; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />

It is a pleasure to have this opportunity to describe the General Dynamics Fort Worth Division’s efforts in the areas of<br />

Productivity <strong>and</strong> Quality Improvement. At Fort Worth, Productivity <strong>and</strong> quality are never separated. On the F-16 program, our<br />

efforts in these areas will save the DOD more than $1 billion by the end of 1981.<br />

Derived from text<br />

Quality Control; Productivity<br />

20040070859 Minnesota Mining <strong>and</strong> Mfg. Co., Saint Paul, MN, USA<br />

Renewing Large Organizations<br />

Lehr, L. W.; <strong>NASA</strong> Symposium on Productivity <strong>and</strong> Quality: Strategies for Improving Operations in Government <strong>and</strong><br />

Industry; [1984], pp. 71-77; In English; See also 20040070839; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />

I say this, even though my subject today-renewing large organizations - is one that has puzzled both public <strong>and</strong> private<br />

sector managers for a long, long time. It’s an old story. Most organizations begin with a small group of people - people who<br />

have a strong drive for success. They build a team. There is no motivation problem, no communication problem. People deal<br />

with each other face--to-face. But than if it’s successful, if it fulfills its mission, the organization begins to grow. Gradually,<br />

things change. Informal give-<strong>and</strong>-take becomes a preoccupation with policy <strong>and</strong> control. New challenges <strong>and</strong> new ideas are<br />

walled off into separate compartments <strong>and</strong> surrounded by specialists . . . almost as if they were some kind of dangerous<br />

infection.<br />

Derived from text<br />

Motivation; Policies<br />

273

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!