01.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20040068170 <strong>NASA</strong> Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA<br />

CFD Support for STS-107 Ascent Investigation<br />

Rogers, Stuart E.; Gomez, Reynaldo J.; Vicker, Darby; Aftosmis, Michael J.; Meakin, Robert; Chan, William M.; Murman,<br />

Scott; 2004; 24 pp.; In English; 42nd AIAA <strong>Aerospace</strong> Sciences Meeting, 5-8 Jan. 2004, Reno, NV, USA; No Copyright;<br />

Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

The research described in this viewgraph presentation investigates the ascent of STS-107 <strong>and</strong> foam-debris impact, <strong>and</strong><br />

contributes to underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the STS-107 accident using CFD tools. The goals of the research are to: 1) Quantify loads on<br />

foam bipod ramp during ascent; 2) Provide steady-state flow-fields to debris-transport simulations; 3) Simulate flight of foam<br />

debris using unsteady six-degree-of-freedom calculations; 4) Provide estimates of foam mass, velocity, <strong>and</strong> impact angle<br />

which correlate with video <strong>and</strong> film evidence.<br />

Derived from text<br />

Computational Fluid Dynamics; Columbia (Orbiter); Accident Investigation<br />

20040068181 <strong>NASA</strong> Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA<br />

Comparison of Artificial Compressibility Methods<br />

Kiris, Cetin; Housman, Jeffrey; Kwak, Dochan; 2003; 2 pp.; In English; ICCFD3 Conference, 12-16 Jul. 2004, Toronto,<br />

Canada; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A01, Hardcopy<br />

Various artificial compressibility methods for calculating three-dimensional, steady <strong>and</strong> unsteady, laminar <strong>and</strong> turbulent,<br />

incompressible Navier-Stokes equations are compared in this work. Each method is described in detail along with appropriate<br />

physical <strong>and</strong> numerical boundary conditions. Analysis of well-posedness <strong>and</strong> numerical solutions to test problems for each<br />

method are provided. A comparison based on convergence behavior, accuracy, stability <strong>and</strong> robustness is used to establish the<br />

relative positive <strong>and</strong> negative characteristics of each method.<br />

Author<br />

Methodology; Numerical Analysis; Robustness (Mathematics); Incompressible Flow<br />

20040068185 <strong>NASA</strong> Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA<br />

Automated Parameter Studies Using a Cartesian Method<br />

Murman, Scott M.; Aftosimis, Michael J.; Nemec, Marian; 2004; 13 pp.; In English; 22nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics<br />

Conference, 16-19 Aug. 2004, Providence, RI, USA; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is now routinely used to analyze isolated points in a design space by performing<br />

steady-state computations at fixed flight conditions (Mach number, angle of attack, sideslip), for a fixed geometric<br />

configuration of interest. This &quot;point analysis&quot; provides detailed information about the flowfield, which aides an<br />

engineer in underst<strong>and</strong>ing, or correcting, a design. A point analysis is typically performed using high fidelity methods at a<br />

h<strong>and</strong>ful of critical design points, e.g. a cruise or l<strong>and</strong>ing configuration, or a sample of points along a flight trajectory.<br />

Author<br />

Computational Fluid Dynamics; Mach Number; Flow Distribution; Flight Conditions<br />

20040068211 <strong>NASA</strong> Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA<br />

Arrays of High Performance Thermal Detectors<br />

Moseley, Harvey; International Thermal Detectors Workshop (TDW 2003); February 2004, pp. 2-15; In English; See also<br />

20040068186; No Copyright; Abstract Only; Available from CASI only as part of the entire parent document<br />

Thermal detectors have historically been the sensors of choice for applications where photoconductive or photovoltaic<br />

detectors are unavailable. While they have the advantage of broad wavelength coverage, a primary disadvantage has been<br />

sensitivity; at a given operating temperature, bolometers are typically much less sensitive than photodetectors. The<br />

development of cryogenic bolometers has resulted in thermal detectors which can reach fundamental sensitivity limits. When<br />

operated at temperatures below 0.3 K these devices can provide background-limited sensitivity for cryogenic imaging <strong>and</strong><br />

spectroscopy in space. The past decade has seen a rapid growth in sensitivity <strong>and</strong> array format in cryogenic bolometers.<br />

Micromachining technology, combined with advances in superconducting electronics, provides a strong technological base for<br />

future developments. I will describe the present state of development of low-temperature thermal detectors, <strong>and</strong> the possible<br />

extension of this technology to higher temperature operation.<br />

Author<br />

Imaging Techniques; Photoconductivity; Superconductivity; Bolometers; Cryogenics<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!