01.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

heat transfer problems, the initial condition may have to be approximated. Also, if the parabolic problem is proposed on a<br />

multi-dimensional region, the parameter alpha, for most cases, would be difficult to compute exactly even in the case that the<br />

initial condition is known exactly. The second objective of this proposed research is to establish a method to estimate this<br />

parameter. This will be done by computing two discontinuous Galerkin approximate solutions at two different time steps<br />

starting from the initial time <strong>and</strong> use them to derive alpha. (3) The third objective is to consider the heat transfer problem over<br />

a two dimensional thin plate. The technique developed by Vogelius <strong>and</strong> Babuska will be used to establish a discontinuous<br />

Galerkin method in which the p-element will be used for through thickness approximation. This h-p finite element approach,<br />

that results in a dimensional reduction method, was used for elliptic problems, but the application appears new for the<br />

parabolic problem. The dimension reduction method will be discussed together with the time discretization method.<br />

Author (revised)<br />

Error Analysis; Galerkin Method; Parabolic Differential Equations<br />

20040073529 California Inst. of Tech., Pasadena, CA, USA<br />

Dynamical Chaos in the Wisdom-Holman Integrator: Origins <strong>and</strong> Solutions<br />

Rauch, Kevin P.; Holman, Matthew; The Astronomical Journal; 1999; Volume 117, pp. 1087-1102; In English<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): NAG5-10365; Copyright; Avail: Other Sources; Abstract Only<br />

We examine the nonlinear stability of the Wisdom-Holman (WH) symplectic mapping applied to the integration of<br />

perturbed, highly eccentric (e-0.9) two-body orbits. We find that the method is unstable <strong>and</strong> introduces artificial chaos into the<br />

computed trajectories for this class of problems, unless the step size chosen 1s small enough that PeriaPse is always resolved,<br />

in which case the method is generically stable. This ‘radial orbit instability’ persists even for weakly perturbed systems. Using<br />

the Stark problem as a fiducial test case, we investigate the dynamical origin of this instability <strong>and</strong> argue that the numerical<br />

chaos results from the overlap of step-size resonances; interestingly, for the Stark-problem many of these resonances appear<br />

to be absolutely stable. We similarly examine the robustness of several alternative integration methods: a time-regularized<br />

version of the WH mapping suggested by Mikkola; the potential-splitting (PS) method of Duncan, Levison, Lee; <strong>and</strong> two<br />

original methods incorporating approximations based on Stark motion instead of Keplerian motion. The two fixed point<br />

problem <strong>and</strong> a related, more general problem are used to conduct a comparative test of the various methods for several types<br />

of motion. Among the algorithms tested, the time-transformed WH mapping is clearly the most efficient <strong>and</strong> stable method<br />

of integrating eccentric, nearly Keplerian orbits in the absence of close encounters. For test particles subject to both high<br />

eccentricities <strong>and</strong> very close encounters, we find an enhanced version of the PS method-incorporating time regularization,<br />

force-center switching, <strong>and</strong> an improved kernel function-to be both economical <strong>and</strong> highly versatile. We conclude that<br />

Stark-based methods are of marginal utility in N-body type integrations. Additional implications for the symplectic integration<br />

of N-body systems are discussed.<br />

Author<br />

Eccentric Orbits; Chaos; Robustness (Mathematics); Many Body Problem; Kernel Functions<br />

20040073569 Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA<br />

Sensitivity Analysis for an Assignment Incentive Pay in the U.S. Navy Enlisted Personnel Assignment Process in a<br />

Simulation Environment<br />

Logemann, Karsten; Mar. 2004; 90 pp.; In English; Original contains color illustrations<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A422386; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A05, Hardcopy<br />

The enlisted personnel assignment process is a major part in the USA Navy’s Personnel Distribution system. It ensures<br />

warfighters <strong>and</strong> supporting activities receive the right sailor with the right training to the right billet at the right time (R4) <strong>and</strong><br />

is a critical element in meeting the challenges of Seapower 21 <strong>and</strong> Global CONOPS. In order to attain these optimal goals<br />

the ways-to-do-it need to be customer-centered <strong>and</strong> should optimize both, the Navy’s needs <strong>and</strong> the sailor’s interests. Recent<br />

studies <strong>and</strong> a detailing pilot in 2002 used a web-based marketplace with two- sided matching mechanisms to accomplish this<br />

vision. This research examines the introduction of an Assignment Incentive Pay (AlP) as part of the U,S, Navy’s enlisted<br />

personnel assignment process in a simulation environment. It uses a previously developed simulation tool, including the<br />

Deferred Acceptance (DA) <strong>and</strong> the Linear Programming (LP) matching algorithm to simulate the assignment process. The<br />

results of the sensitivity analysis suggested that the Navy should mainly emphasize sailor quality rather than saving AIP funds<br />

in order to maximize utility <strong>and</strong> the possible matches When adopting such an introduction policy also the percentage of<br />

unstable matches under the LP as the matching algorithm was reduced.<br />

DTIC<br />

Algorithms; Billets; Incentives; Navy; Personnel; Sensitivity Analysis; Simulation<br />

218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!