Economic importance of the Flemish maritime ports: Report 2002

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TABLE 63BREAKDOWN OF FINDINGS BY CLUSTER AT THE PORT OF ZEEBRUGGENumber of companiesDirect value added(in millions of euros)Direct salariedemployment(in FTE)Investment(in millions of euros)Clusters SMEs LargecompaniesSMEsLargecompaniesSMEsLargecompaniesSMEsLargecompaniesMaritime.......................... 22 78 217.3 30.0 3.780 435 38.0 4.2Non-maritimeWholesale trade .............. 16 95 19.5 21.7 283 394 2.4 6.9Industry............................ 20 55 239.1 33.1 2.332 545 23.4 4.2Logistics services ............ 5 64 38.2 7.0 674 81 6.4 3.7Transport ......................... 6 22 40.0 17.3 623 319 16.7 4.2Total................................ 69 314 554.1 109.1 7.691 1.774 86.9 23.1Source: NBB.Remark: This relates only to the findings for port companies in the narrow sense.TABLE 64BREAKDOWN OF FINDINGS BY SECTOR AT THE PORT OF ZEEBRUGGENumber of companiesDirect value added(in millions of euros)Direct salariedemployment(in FTE)Investment(in millions of euros)Sectors SMEs LargecompaniesSMEsLargecompaniesSMEsLargecompaniesSMEsLargecompaniesShipping agents andforwarders ........................... 7 22 13.8 9.7 149 144 6.3 1.4Cargo handlers.................... 6 21 93.0 3.1 1,185 38 21.2 0.8Shipping companies............ 1 9 2.9 4.8 37 45 7.3 0.2Road transport .................... 4 20 24.8 15.7 340 276 7.1 4.1Other services ..................... 21 162 43.7 30.3 722 520 13.4 10.4Energy................................. 2 0 69.1 0.0 330 0 4.0 0.0Oil industry .......................... 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0Chemicals............................ 3 3 27.2 1.2 264 21 2.1 0.3Shipbuilding and repair ....... 1 4 3.8 2.6 65 49 0.2 0.1Car manufacturing............... 1 1 15.0 0.1 50 1 1.0 0.0Electronics........................... 1 3 55.3 3.0 595 61 5.4 1.1Metal-working industry ........ 7 16 39.2 11.2 486 189 4.3 0.9Fishing................................. 3 19 5.9 8.9 122 145 1.7 1.5Food industry....................... 2 8 6.2 6.2 150 117 0.3 0.8Other industries................... 8 26 66.9 12.3 951 167 8.4 1.6Public sector........................ 2 0 87.2 0.0 2,244 0 4.4 0.0Total.................................... 69 314 554.1 109.1 7,691 1,774 86.9 23.1Source: NBB.Remark: This relates only to the findings for port companies in the narrow sense.110 NBB WORKING PAPER No.56 - JUNE 2004
ANNEX 7: SOCIAL BALANCE SHEET IN 2002TABLE 65SOCIAL BALANCE SHEETS IN 2002 BY SECTORSectorShipping agents and forwarders....................Cargo handlers...............................................Shipping companies.......................................Road transport ...............................................Other services................................................Energy............................................................Oil industry .....................................................Chemicals ......................................................Shipbuilding and repair ..................................Car manufacturing .........................................Electronics......................................................Metal-working industry...................................Fishing............................................................Food industry .................................................Other industry.................................................Public sector...................................................Total...............................................................full-time10015,39913,8246042,16811,5072,1023,04212,72674113,2641,62810,2856451,2976,610085,842Numberpart-time100260938977901,811116220831408292283443318426506,064total(in FTE)10035,80814,1076432,22812,5892,1933,20113,29076413,8231,80610,5216661,4176,785089,841Hours actually worked (1)full-timepart-timetotal(in FTE)1011 1012 10139.2 0.7 9.919.4 0.6 20.01.1 0.1 1.13.9 0.1 4.018.2 1.7 19.92.8 0.1 2.95.3 0.3 5.619.1 1.0 20.11.1 0.0 1.118.9 0.8 19.72.5 0.2 2.715.6 0.4 16.00.9 0.0 1.02.0 0.2 2.110.2 0.3 10.50.0 0.0 0.0130.2 6.5 136.7AVERAGE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEESPersonnel costs (2) Hired temporary stafffull-timepart-timetotal(in FTE)numberhours actuallyworked (1)costs(2)1021 1022 1023 1501 1511 1521260.3 22.6 282.9 299 0.58 11.2664.6 99.3 763.9 679 1.24 31.437.8 2.2 40.0 3 0.01 0.293.8 2.4 96.2 72 0.13 2.7579.3 48.3 627.6 399 0.75 17.3181.3 7.9 189.3 14 0.03 0.6367.3 18.3 385.7 40 0.07 2.4939.3 46.9 986.2 200 0.37 10.627.8 0.9 28.7 56 0.10 2.4670.6 29.7 700.4 324 0.58 14.592.1 8.1 100.2 67 0.13 3.2608.5 14.3 622.8 155 0.31 7.528.6 1.1 29.7 32 0.06 1.158.6 4.7 63.3 104 0.20 4.2321.5 9.6 331.1 209 0.37 9.20.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0.04,931.7 316.4 5,248.0 2,653 4.92 118.3Persons placed at theenterprise's disposalnumberhours actuallyworked (1)costs (2)1502151215226461.0835.15,0849.03304.1810.144.81370.237.91610.2710.700.000.020.000.330.010.300.000.01430.218.100.000.0990.186.400.000.0180.021.0260.051.200.000.06,40111.21379.9Bron: NBB.(1) The hours actually worked in terms of millions of hours.(2) The personnel costs and costs in terms of millions of euros.NBB WORKING PAPER No. 56 - JUNE 2004 111
Page 3:
AbstractThis paper provides an exte
Page 8 and 9:
conditions than those in Europe in
Page 10 and 11:
1 INTERNATIONAL CONTEXTIn 2002 the
Page 12 and 13:
average 41.1 p.c. of the traffic in
Page 14 and 15:
The study goes on to describe some
Page 16 and 17:
3.1.2 Changes in indirect VAAs poin
Page 18 and 19:
3.3 Comparison of change in value a
Page 20 and 21:
3.5.1 Contract type and human resou
Page 22 and 23:
GRAPH 4TOTAL NUMBER OF STAFF EMPLOY
Page 24 and 25:
as a whole (0.8 p.c. in 2002). Desp
Page 26 and 27:
• A slight decline in solvency wa
Page 28 and 29:
4.1.2 Value addedTABLE 7 SUMMARY OF
Page 30 and 31:
• The car manufacturing rose by 4
Page 32 and 33:
TABLE 9 SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN EMPLO
Page 34 and 35:
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN INVE
Page 36 and 37:
4.1.5 Financial ratios (private com
Page 38 and 39:
4.2 Port of Ghent4.2.1 Significant
Page 40 and 41:
TABLE 16 SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN VALU
Page 42 and 43:
4.2.3 Salaried employmentTABLE 18 S
Page 44 and 45:
At the port of Ghent, the major cha
Page 46 and 47:
investments was seen (+ 26.9 p.c.),
Page 48 and 49:
Binnenvaart Bulk en Container Trans
Page 50 and 51:
4.3 Port of Ostend4.3.1 Significant
Page 52 and 53:
TABLE 25 SUMMARY OF THE CHANGES IN
Page 54 and 55:
4.3.3 Salaried employmentTABLE 27 S
Page 56 and 57:
Changes by sector in direct effects
Page 58 and 59:
continued in 2002. Hence, investmen
Page 60 and 61:
TABLE 32RATIOS BY SECTORSectorsRetu
Page 62 and 63:
4.4 Port of Zeebrugge4.4.1 Signific
Page 64 and 65:
TABLE 34(continued)SUMMARY OF THE C
Page 66 and 67: 4.4.3 Salaried employmentTABLE 36 S
Page 68 and 69: • Following two good years for th
Page 70 and 71: 36.0 p.c. in industry and by 51.9 p
Page 72 and 73: By sectorTABLE 41RATIOS BY SECTORSe
Page 74 and 75: 5 SUMMARY OF THE MAIN RESULTS AND P
Page 76 and 77: 5.2 Prospects for the Flemish marit
Page 78 and 79: List of abbreviationsd.w.t.ESA 95EU
Page 80 and 81: TABLE 45CLUSTERSClustersNACEcodesDe
Page 82 and 83: 3.2 SelectionNon-maritime companies
Page 84 and 85: Comment: This is why there is a two
Page 86 and 87: o 3413 early retirement (*)o 3423 d
Page 88 and 89: 5.2 Estimation of indirect effects5
Page 90 and 91: means that this value grew by 4.0 p
Page 92 and 93: 86 NBB WORKING PAPER No.56 - JUNE 2
Page 94 and 95: - ten zuiden: het kanaal Plassendal
Page 96 and 97: Haven van Gent - Port de Gand - Por
Page 98 and 99: Haven van Zeebrugge - Port de Zeebr
Page 100 and 101: Suttak Nace-bel Cluster Sector Defi
Page 102 and 103: Suttak Nace-bel Cluster Sector Defi
Page 104 and 105: ANNEX 4:LIST OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATI
Page 106 and 107: 1.2 EMPLOYMENTTABLE 50SUMMARY OF TH
Page 114 and 115: TABLE 59BREAKDOWN OF FINDINGS BY CL
Page 118 and 119: Table 65(continued)SOCIAL BALANCE S
Page 120 and 121: ANNEX 8: MARITIME TRAFFIC BY PORT I
Page 122 and 123: ANNEX 9:GLOSSARY AND MARITIME TRANS
Page 124 and 125: 3 Intermodality 86In the transport
Page 126 and 127: KB Weekly Bulletin no. 51/16 (May 1
Page 128 and 129: NATIONAL BANK OF BELGIUM - WORKING
Page 130: 53. « Does Financial Liberalizatio
show all

Economic importance of the Flemish maritime ports: Report 2002

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?