12.07.2015 Views

Economic importance of the Flemish maritime ports: Report 2002

Economic importance of the Flemish maritime ports: Report 2002

Economic importance of the Flemish maritime ports: Report 2002

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.4 Overall data on direct investmentThe study relates to tangible fixed assets at current prices as fixed assets realised in <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> financialyear. Some corrections are made in <strong>the</strong> event <strong>of</strong> takeovers, as stated in <strong>the</strong> methodology (annex 1).TABLE 4INVESTMENT(millions <strong>of</strong> euros)1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 <strong>2002</strong> Relativeshare in<strong>2002</strong>(in p.c.)Changefrom 1995to <strong>2002</strong>(in p.c.)Annualaveragechange(in p.c.)Antwerp ................ 1,098.2 1,231.8 1,224.6 1,211.8 1,012.0 1,321.4 1,559.5 1,481.3 59.2 34.9 4.4Ghent.................... 331.4 447.4 385.3 430.5 659.0 600.3 629.8 802.4 32.0 142.1 13.5Ostend .................. 154.2 50.8 90.1 101.5 117.7 97.5 64.8 58.5 2.3 - 62.0 - 12.9Zeebrugge ............ 109.9 97.4 130.1 187.6 191.0 166.4 122.7 110.0 4.4 0.1 0.0Outside <strong>ports</strong> ........ 55.5 65.4 71.5 80.1 70.5 77.9 63.2 51.6 2.1 - 7.0 - 1.0Total investment. 1,749.2 1,892.8 1,901.5 2,011.5 2,050.3 2,263.5 2,440.0 2,503.8 100.0 43.1 5.3Source: NBB.For Antwerp, <strong>the</strong> year 2001 constitutes a peak for <strong>the</strong> period concerned, with investments exceeding 1.5 billioneuro (table 4). The upward trend, which began in 2000, seemed to be confirmed after a more modest year in1999. From 1995 to <strong>2002</strong>, <strong>the</strong> port <strong>of</strong> Ghent saw investments more than double (+ 142.1 p.c., i.e. + 13.5 p.c. asan annual average). At Antwerp, <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> investment has increased by 4.4 p.c. per annum over <strong>the</strong> sameperiod. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong>re was stagnation at Zeebrugge (after several increases in 1997 and 1998, in <strong>2002</strong>it returned to <strong>the</strong> 1995 level) and a drop <strong>of</strong> 12.9 p.c. per annum at Ostend. In <strong>2002</strong>, investments at current pricesreached 2.5 billion euro for all <strong>ports</strong>, i.e. a rise <strong>of</strong> 2.6 p.c. in comparison to <strong>the</strong> previous year: this level was above<strong>the</strong> investment price index for <strong>2002</strong> (- 0.4 p.c. 29 ) This trend came from <strong>the</strong> port <strong>of</strong> Ghent, which recorded a rise <strong>of</strong>27.4 p.c. However, investments dropped in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r three <strong>ports</strong>: - 5.0 p.c. for Antwerp, - 9.6 p.c. for Ostendand - 10.4 p.c. for Zeebrugge. These developments are examined in detail in <strong>the</strong> next chapter.3.5 Overall data on <strong>the</strong> social balance sheet 30Since its introduction in 1996, <strong>the</strong> social balance sheet has <strong>of</strong>fered a consistent data set covering changes invarious aspects <strong>of</strong> company employment ranging from staff appointments and staff composition to employees’contractual status and qualifications, personnel costs, training policy and reasons for contract termination. As notall companies included in this study file <strong>the</strong>ir annual accounts based on <strong>the</strong> full presentation, <strong>the</strong> findings beloware not exhaustive. Indeed, <strong>the</strong> constant sample defined for <strong>the</strong> period from 2000 to <strong>2002</strong> groups toge<strong>the</strong>r 1,555companies, which is slightly less than half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total population considered in this study (3,147 companies in<strong>2002</strong>). Comments focus on <strong>the</strong> changes that took place during <strong>the</strong> last three years. The <strong>2002</strong> figures are given ingreater detail, by sector, in annex 7.2930Source: Belgostat online (http://www.belgostat.be)The national data given in point 3.5 are taken from <strong>the</strong> Social Balance Sheet <strong>2002</strong> (NBB, <strong>Economic</strong> Review 2003/4). Theresults given here relate to a constant sample and are aggregated for all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>ports</strong>.NBB WORKING PAPER No. 56 - JUNE 2004 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!