12.07.2015 Views

Economic importance of the Flemish maritime ports: Report 2002

Economic importance of the Flemish maritime ports: Report 2002

Economic importance of the Flemish maritime ports: Report 2002

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

By sectorTABLE 41RATIOS BY SECTORSectorsReturn on equity after tax(in p.c.)Liquidity in broad senseSolvency(in p.c.)2000 2001 <strong>2002</strong> 2000 2001 <strong>2002</strong> 2000 2001 <strong>2002</strong>Shipping agents andforwarders .............................. 5.2 9.4 7.8 1.0 1.0 0.9 18.9 25.2 22.5Cargo handlers ...................... 3.1 4.2 8.3 0.8 0.8 1.0 59.3 61.3 65.7Shipping companies .............. - 3.7 - 1.2 2.9 3.2 3.7 3.2 71.1 73.6 73.8Road transport ....................... 5.8 8.3 12.0 0.9 1.1 1.2 37.1 43.1 44.6O<strong>the</strong>r services........................ 0.8 2.6 0.7 1.1 1.4 1.4 30.6 37.8 39.8Energy.................................... 18.0 9.3 11.4 1.3 1.4 1.7 26.5 48.6 52.0Oil industry............................. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n.Chemicals .............................. 24.9 18.8 18.4 1.5 1.3 1.2 41.6 42.8 42.9Shipbuilding and repair.......... 11.5 12.6 9.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 18.4 23.4 33.8Car manufacturing ................. 19.5 10.8 11.0 1.6 1.4 2.4 68.2 49.6 66.3Electronics ............................. 14.5 - 14.9 - 388.9 1.5 1.2 1.8 50.9 47.1 14.0Metal-working industry........... 2.6 18.2 4.5 1.1 1.1 1.2 29.2 31.3 31.6Fishing ................................... - 3.5 12.5 1.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 28.1 27.2 30.8Food industry......................... 4.4 - 7.3 - 25.5 1.2 1.2 1.0 25.1 24.5 21.0O<strong>the</strong>r industries ..................... 5.0 5.0 3.3 1.1 1.2 1.5 31.6 34.7 38.9Public sector .......................... n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n.Weighted average................ 5.5 5.9 2.8 1.2 1.2 1.3 37.6 43.4 45.2Source: NBB.• The average pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> those companies at <strong>the</strong> port <strong>of</strong> Zeebrugge fell substantially in <strong>2002</strong>. Industry wasdirectly affected by this drop, mainly metal-working, o<strong>the</strong>r and electronics industries (table 41). For <strong>the</strong> latter,changes can be explained by <strong>the</strong> drastic financial restructuring programme at Philips Industrial Activitieswhere record losses were recorded (nearly 142 million euro for <strong>the</strong> Bruges-Zeebrugge site in <strong>2002</strong>);• Liquidity increased slightly in <strong>2002</strong>, especially in <strong>the</strong> electronics industry. The liquidity ratio for PhillipsIndustrial Activities advanced from 1.1 to 1.8;• Solvency increased, especially in <strong>the</strong> <strong>maritime</strong> cluster – principally in <strong>the</strong> cargo handling, fishing and o<strong>the</strong>r<strong>maritime</strong> industries sectors: Belgian New Fruit Wharf, Brugse Visrokerij Alloo and Baggerwerken Decloedt enZoon in particular witnessed a sharp fall in <strong>the</strong>ir debts.66 NBB WORKING PAPER No.56 - JUNE 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!