12.07.2015 Views

Economic importance of the Flemish maritime ports: Report 2002

Economic importance of the Flemish maritime ports: Report 2002

Economic importance of the Flemish maritime ports: Report 2002

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TABLE 27 SUMMARY OF THE CHANGES IN EMPLOYMENT AT OSTEND FROM 1995 TO <strong>2002</strong>(continued)(FTE)Sectors(indirect effects 51 )1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 <strong>2002</strong> Relativeshare in<strong>2002</strong>(in p.c.)Changefrom 1995to <strong>2002</strong>(in p.c.)Annualaveragechange(in p.c.)Total <strong>maritime</strong> .............. 3,587 3,857 3,792 3,277 2,563 544 654 539 17.6 - 85.0 - 23.7Total non-<strong>maritime</strong> ...... 1,678 1,900 1,796 1,985 2,229 2,203 2,389 2,526 82.4 50.5 6.0Indirect effects ............. 5,266 5,756 5,588 5,262 4,792 2,747 3,043 3,065 100.0 - 41.8 - 7.4Total employment ........ 10,451 10,804 10,389 9,729 9,249 6,633 7,186 7,159 - - 31.5 - 5.3Source: NBB.General changesIn contrast to <strong>the</strong> three o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>ports</strong>, total employment (direct, including allocation, and indirect) at <strong>the</strong> port <strong>of</strong>Ostend fell markedly over <strong>the</strong> period 1995 - <strong>2002</strong>, by 31.5 p.c., which corresponds to - 5.3 p.c. per annum onaverage. This change is attributable, above all, to <strong>the</strong> sharp fall in subcontracting, since indirect employmentcontracted by 41.8 p.c. over this period, or by - 7.4 p.c. per annum on average. The decrease in directemployment is not as sharp but is never<strong>the</strong>less quite pronounced at - 21.0 p.c., which corresponds to - 3.3 p.c.per annum on average. The employment created, especially in <strong>the</strong> highly productive sector <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chemicals, wasnot sufficient to reverse this trend. 2000 will remain a bad year in terms <strong>of</strong> employment: 12.8 p.c. <strong>of</strong> direct jobs,42.7 p.c. <strong>of</strong> indirect jobs and, as a result, 28.3 p.c. <strong>of</strong> total employment was lost. This significant fall can beexplained largely by <strong>the</strong> cessation <strong>of</strong> trading by RMT and by <strong>the</strong> restructuring work carried out in o<strong>the</strong>r sectorssuch as chemicals. As shown in greater detail below, employment here has fallen constantly, as has investment,which has been virtually zero for Ostend-based shipping companies since 1996. The indirect employment relatedto this sector is very substantial and <strong>the</strong> collapse that can be seen in table 27 is <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> RMT ceasing trading,among o<strong>the</strong>r things. Since most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r shipping companies are foreign, <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> this company has causedOstend's share in <strong>the</strong> allocation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> indirect effects related to this sector to fall very sharply. However, <strong>the</strong>sector generates a lot <strong>of</strong> indirect jobs. Although Ostend no longer contributes to this total, <strong>the</strong> impact on <strong>the</strong>supply chain is immediate, assuming that <strong>the</strong> indirect effects are limited to <strong>the</strong> national economy (cf. hypo<strong>the</strong>sis 2<strong>of</strong> annex 1 - point 5.2.3).The slight upturn in 2001 (+ 6.6 p.c. direct jobs, + 10.8 p.c. indirect jobs and + 8.3 p.c. total jobs) was not enoughto <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>the</strong>se losses. In <strong>2002</strong>, ano<strong>the</strong>r fall in direct employment (- 1.2 p.c.), barely <strong>of</strong>fset by <strong>the</strong> slight rise inindirect employment (+ 0.7 p.c.), was noted. Overall, this represented a total drop <strong>of</strong> 0.4 p.c. for all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>companies associated with <strong>the</strong> port <strong>of</strong> Ostend.For subcontracting, <strong>the</strong> ratio between indirect and direct employment peaked at 117.8 p.c. in 1998. It <strong>the</strong>ndropped somewhat in 1999, before falling below 75 p.c. in 2000. In <strong>2002</strong>, this ratio amounted to 74.8 p.c. Therelative fall in indirect employment at <strong>the</strong> port <strong>of</strong> Ostend is due principally to <strong>the</strong> fall in employment at <strong>the</strong> shippingcompanies and in fishing, sectors that are heavily dependent on external labour.Changes by cluster in direct effectsEven though employment has been declining since 1998, it fell most sharply in 2000 (- 12.8 p.c., see table 27),with <strong>the</strong> liquidation <strong>of</strong> RMT and <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> its 390 jobs. With <strong>the</strong> disappearance <strong>of</strong> this company's directemployment, toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> labour related to its operations, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> jobs in <strong>the</strong> <strong>maritime</strong> cluster shrankby 37,3 p.c. The industry segment was also dragged down by this fall, although to a lesser degree (- 4.7 p.c.).After picking up slightly in 2001 (+ 6.6 p.c.), direct employment fell once again <strong>the</strong> following year, which also sawa considerable decrease in VA at Ostend. In <strong>2002</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re was a substantial decline in employment in <strong>the</strong> <strong>maritime</strong>cluster (- 16.2 p.c.) and in <strong>the</strong> wholesale trade (- 8.7 p.c.). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> people employed inindustry and in logistics services grew by 4.7 p.c. and 10.6 p.c. respectively.51The breakdown <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> indirect effects by sector for <strong>the</strong> period 1995 - 1999 can be found in annex 5 (table 54).NBB WORKING PAPER No. 56 - JUNE 2004 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!