12.07.2015 Views

J. C. Penney Company, Inc. Equity Valuation and Analysis As of ...

J. C. Penney Company, Inc. Equity Valuation and Analysis As of ...

J. C. Penney Company, Inc. Equity Valuation and Analysis As of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This value <strong>of</strong> the perpetuity then needed to be brought back to year one fromyear ten. We did this by multiplying by the present value factor <strong>of</strong> year ten. Wethen summed the core earnings, which are the forecasted earnings in 2007, plusthe perpetuity present value <strong>and</strong> the sum <strong>of</strong> the present value <strong>of</strong> abnormalearnings growth. To find our value <strong>of</strong> equity, we took this sum <strong>and</strong> divided bythe J. C. <strong>Penney</strong>’s cost <strong>of</strong> equity. Finally, we took our number <strong>of</strong> sharesoutst<strong>and</strong>ing at present time <strong>and</strong> divided it into our value <strong>of</strong> equity to come upwith our estimated price per share <strong>of</strong> $22.88 adjusted to June 1, 2007.During our sensitivity analysis, we used aggressive negative growth ratesto attempt to reach our current share price. We were only successful in reachinga fairly valued share price by cutting cost <strong>of</strong> equity to .05 <strong>and</strong> having a growthrate <strong>of</strong> -50 percent. This proves along with our other models that J. C. <strong>Penney</strong> isextremely overvalued since we couldn’t achieve a fairly valued price because wedo not believe J. C. <strong>Penney</strong> could cut cost <strong>of</strong> equity to .05 <strong>and</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> -50percent is not achievable.Abnormal Earnings Growth <strong>and</strong> Residual <strong>Inc</strong>ome Pro<strong>of</strong>2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Annual AEG -71.72 -77.50 -83.63 -87.29 -94.18 -101.47 -106.12 -114.32 -123.01Change in RI -71.72 -77.50 -83.63 -87.29 -94.18 -101.47 -106.12 -114.32 -123.01<strong>As</strong> mentioned previously, the abnormal earnings growth <strong>and</strong> residualincome models are linked. If one were to take the change in residual incomefrom 2008 to 2007, the result would be the annual abnormal earnings growthfrom 2008. The chart above illustrates this for our forecasted years up to 2016.This can help verify that the valuation models are correctly calculated.Because <strong>of</strong> this link, the abnormal earnings growth <strong>and</strong> residual incomevaluation share price should be very close. Our models came up with prices thatwere about nine dollars apart. After reviewing our numbers, we looked carefullyat the perpetuity <strong>and</strong> realized that was where our numbers differed. The reason124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!