A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India - Geological & Mining ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

31. Have you received first aid training in your community?Rudraprayag Yes No38 47Percentage 44.71 55.29Almora Yes No10 75Percentage 11.76 88.2432. Have you received search and rescue training in your community?Rudraprayag Yes No17 68Percentage 20 80Almora Yes No2 83Percentage 2.35 97.6533. Have you received training on building temporary shelters in your community?Rudraprayag Yes No23 62Percentage 97.75 72.94Almora Yes No1 84Percentage 1.18 98.8234. Which houses do you perceive as being safer from disasters?Rudraprayag Trad New Both Don't know46 39 0 0Percentage 54.12 45.88 0 0Almora Trad New Both Don't know44 28 7 6Percentage 51.76 32.94 8.24 7.0635. Would you be willing to spend a slightly more money on your home for EQ safe features, 5-7% of the total cost?Rudraprayag Yes No Don't know83 2 0Percentage 97.65 2.35 0Almora Yes No Don't know59 11 15Percentage 69.41 12.94 17.65The Role of NGOs in Disaster Mitigation and Response – A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India 105
36. Would you prefer traditional masons or trained masons in safety features from outside to build your homes?Rudraprayag Yes No83 2Percentage 97.65 2.35Almora Yes No Only to village mason Experienced Bihar Traditional Don't know32 8 18 10 1 2 14Percentage 37.65 9.41 21.18 11.76 1.18 2.35 16.4737. Please discuss some construction features that may help to make your home safe (ex. depth of foundation, site selection, etc)?RudraprayagAlmora% %don't know 5 5.88 51 60.00traditional 5 5.88 0 0.00technique 7 8.24 1 1.18columns 65 76.47 11 12.94band 38 44.71 5 5.88RCC 11 12.94 17 20.00use of wood 5 5.88 3 3.53light roof 10 11.76 1 1.18single steel rod 5 5.88 3 3.53throughstone 22 25.88 2 2.35beam 37 43.53 5 5.88strong foundation 5 5.88 9 10.59use of tin 2 2.35 2 2.35location 2 2.35 0 0.00light wieght structure 2 2.35 2 2.35hooks 1 1.18 1 1.18concrete blocks 1 1.18 0 0.00slab 2 2.35 0 0.00small openings 1 1.18 0 0.00135 rim 1 1.18 0 0.00local material 1 1.18 0 0.00single story 1 1.18 1 1.18iron frames 1 1.18 0 0.00thin stones 1 1.18 0 0.00good mortar 1 1.18 0 0.00stone masonary 0 0.00 1 1.18The Role of NGOs in Disaster Mitigation and Response – A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India 106
Page 1 and 2:
The Role of Non GovernmentalOrganis
Page 3 and 4:
Table of contentsChapter 1 - Introd
Page 5 and 6:
List of figuresFigure 1.1: Study re
Page 7 and 8:
preparedness, and has potential to
Page 9 and 10:
This case study investigates the im
Page 11 and 12:
• What are homeowner perceptions
Page 13 and 14:
Seismic activity in this area is du
Page 15 and 16:
The study comprises two regions: St
Page 17 and 18:
1.4.1 - b Study Area B- Almora dist
Page 19 and 20:
etc. operational). The study involv
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 2 - Theoretical Orientation
Page 23 and 24:
2.1.2 VulnerabilityVulnerability is
Page 25 and 26:
of a disaster everyone knows how to
Page 27 and 28:
disaster management in the country,
Page 29 and 30:
Despite the apparent increased cons
Page 31 and 32:
2.3.1 Disaster Mitigation and Prepa
Page 33 and 34:
save lives. This event marked a pri
Page 35 and 36:
Systems technologies and education
Page 37 and 38:
As suggested previously, there is a
Page 39 and 40:
on the main agenda (Benson et al, 2
Page 41 and 42:
Frame structureFramed structures ha
Page 43 and 44:
The curriculum of the PSI workshops
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 2.2a: Community based disast
Page 47 and 48:
district irrespective of the fact t
Page 49 and 50:
etrofitting, monitoring and homeown
Page 51 and 52:
structures as an alarming forty-fiv
Page 53 and 54:
Reponses for what features masons t
Page 55 and 56:
trained masons in the Study Area A
Page 57 and 58:
ecommended that a similar study be
Page 59 and 60:
3.1.2b Awareness and Dissemination
Page 61 and 62: It is interesting to note that when
Page 63 and 64: Community based disaster preparedne
Page 65 and 66: 3.1.3 - Section 3 Housing Impact As
Page 67 and 68: Load-bearing1.single steel rod in e
Page 69 and 70: The overall proportion of newly bui
Page 71 and 72: etween stirrups of 6-12 inches. Alt
Page 73 and 74: Table 3.7: Percentage of safe house
Page 75 and 76: 3.2 DiscussionThe discussion segmen
Page 77 and 78: In Study Area A the number of earth
Page 79 and 80: 2) mitigation measures were taken i
Page 81 and 82: 3.3 ConclusionsIn conclusion, the s
Page 83 and 84: ReferencesAlexander, D., 1997. The
Page 85 and 86: Guptasarma, D. 1996. Is the Seismic
Page 87 and 88: Telford, J. and Cosgrave, J., 2007.
Page 89 and 90: Annex I - Earthquake safe featuresT
Page 91 and 92: The Role of NGOs in Disaster Mitiga
Page 97 and 98: Annex 2 - Mason Interview ResultsSt
Page 99 and 100: 11. How to make such a course more
Page 101 and 102: sloped roof 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 1 2.78s
Page 103 and 104: 17. Do homeowners request earthquak
Page 105 and 106: light roof 1 0 1 2.78 0 0.00RCC 1 3
Page 107 and 108: 6. How long have you lived in the v
Page 109 and 110: 16. Do you have an emergency commun
Page 111: 26. What activities related to the
Page 115 and 116: Appendix IV - Breakdown of earthqua
Page 117: Appendix IV - Breakdown of earthqua
show all

A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India - Geological & Mining ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?