A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India - Geological & Mining ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Molnar, P. 1990, A review of the seismicity and the rates of active underthrustingand deformation at the Himalaya. Journal for Himalayan Geology, I (2) 131-154found in Guptasarma, D. 1996. “Is the Seismic Risk similar everywhere along theHimalayan Collision Belt?” Himalayan Geology, Vol. 17, pp 1-9.Mountain Forum Himalayas, 2007. Report on Disaster and Governance. Editedand published by Church’s Auxiliary for Social Action (CASA) and Mountain ForumHimalyas.O’Reilly, G. 2006. What is development? Discussion Paper Dublin: HumanitarianAid and Geopolitics Module, University Colledge Dublin, IrelandOverseas Development Institue (ODI), 2005. Briefing Paper, Aftershocks: NaturalDisaster Risk and Economic Development Policy.Palakudiyil, T. and Todd, M., 2003. Facing up to the storm - How local communitiescan cope with disaster: lessons from Orissa and Gujarat. Christian Aid.Paul, D.K., 2004. Public Policies for Hazard Management: Appropriate StructuralDesigns and Building Codes. . In “Coping with Natural Hazards: Indian Context”,Orient Longman Private Limited. Pp 71-90.Parkash, S., 2005. An Approach towards People’s Methodology for Village LevelCommunity Based Multi-Hazard Assessment and Risk Management in UttaranchalState, India. People’s Science Institute.Pugh, M. (1998). Post-conflict Rehabilitation: social and civil dimensions. TheJournal of Humanitarian Assistance http://www.jha.ac/articles/a034.htmRajendran, C.P. and Rajendran, K. 2004. Towards Better Seismic HazardAssessment: Need for an Integrated Approach. . In “Coping with Natural Hazards:Indian Context”, Orient Longman Private Limited. Pp 59-70.Rocha, J. L. and Christoplos, I., 2001. Disaster Mitigation and Preparedness on theNicaraguan Post-Mitch Agenda. Disasters, 25 (3): 240-250.Sharma, V.K., 2004. Disaster Management Strategies in India. In “Coping withNatural Hazards: Indian Context”, Orient Longman Private Limited. Pp 250-256.Slim, H., 1995. The Continuing Metamorphosis of the Humanitarian Practitioner:Some New Colours for an Endangered Chameleon. Disasters, 19(2): 110-26. seenin, Alexander, D., 1997. The Study of Natural Disasters, 1977-1997: SomeRefections on a Changing Field of Knowledge. Disasters, 21 (4): 284-304.Suchetna Newsletter, Vol. 5, 2007. PSI Quarterly Newsletter, Figures presented onstatewide disaster statistics for 2006.The Role of NGOs in Disaster Mitigation and Response – A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India 79
Telford, J. and Cosgrave, J., 2007. The international humanitarian system and the2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunmanis. Disasters, 30 (1): 1-28.Turner, B.A., 1979. The Societal Aeitology of Disasters. Disasters, 3(1): 53-9. seenin Alexander, D., 1997. The Study of Natural Disasters, 1977-1997: SomeRefections on a Changing Field of Knowledge. Disasters, 21 (4): 284-304.Twigg, J., Steiner, D., Myers, M., and Benson, C., 2000. NGO Natural Disaster andMitigation Project: A Study of International Development and Relief Organizationsbasedin the UK. Research study funded by ESCOR.UNDRO, 1982. Natural Disasters and Vulnerability Analysis. Office of the UNDisaster Relief Co-ordinatior, Geneva. Seen in, Alexander, D., 1997. The Study ofNatural Disasters, 1977-1997: Some Refections on a Changing Field ofKnowledge. Disasters, 21 (4): 284-304.United Nations, International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. Mobilizing localcommunities in disaster reduction”.Valdiya, K.S., 2004. Geodynamic Perspective of Natural Hazard in India. In“Coping with Natural Hazards: Indian Context”, Orient Longman Private Limited.pp. 7-36.Wisner, B., 1983. Disaster Vulnerability: Scale, Power and Daily Life. Geojournal30(2):127-40, seen in Alexander, D., 1997. The Study of Natural Disasters, 1977-1997: Some Refections on a Changing Field of Knowledge. Disasters, 21 (4): 284-304.http://faculty.ncwc.edu/toconnor/431/431lect10.htmThe Role of NGOs in Disaster Mitigation and Response – A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India 80
Page 1 and 2:
The Role of Non GovernmentalOrganis
Page 3 and 4:
Table of contentsChapter 1 - Introd
Page 5 and 6:
List of figuresFigure 1.1: Study re
Page 7 and 8:
preparedness, and has potential to
Page 9 and 10:
This case study investigates the im
Page 11 and 12:
• What are homeowner perceptions
Page 13 and 14:
Seismic activity in this area is du
Page 15 and 16:
The study comprises two regions: St
Page 17 and 18:
1.4.1 - b Study Area B- Almora dist
Page 19 and 20:
etc. operational). The study involv
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 2 - Theoretical Orientation
Page 23 and 24:
2.1.2 VulnerabilityVulnerability is
Page 25 and 26:
of a disaster everyone knows how to
Page 27 and 28:
disaster management in the country,
Page 29 and 30:
Despite the apparent increased cons
Page 31 and 32:
2.3.1 Disaster Mitigation and Prepa
Page 33 and 34:
save lives. This event marked a pri
Page 35 and 36: Systems technologies and education
Page 37 and 38: As suggested previously, there is a
Page 39 and 40: on the main agenda (Benson et al, 2
Page 41 and 42: Frame structureFramed structures ha
Page 43 and 44: The curriculum of the PSI workshops
Page 45 and 46: Figure 2.2a: Community based disast
Page 47 and 48: district irrespective of the fact t
Page 49 and 50: etrofitting, monitoring and homeown
Page 51 and 52: structures as an alarming forty-fiv
Page 53 and 54: Reponses for what features masons t
Page 55 and 56: trained masons in the Study Area A
Page 57 and 58: ecommended that a similar study be
Page 59 and 60: 3.1.2b Awareness and Dissemination
Page 61 and 62: It is interesting to note that when
Page 63 and 64: Community based disaster preparedne
Page 65 and 66: 3.1.3 - Section 3 Housing Impact As
Page 67 and 68: Load-bearing1.single steel rod in e
Page 69 and 70: The overall proportion of newly bui
Page 71 and 72: etween stirrups of 6-12 inches. Alt
Page 73 and 74: Table 3.7: Percentage of safe house
Page 75 and 76: 3.2 DiscussionThe discussion segmen
Page 77 and 78: In Study Area A the number of earth
Page 79 and 80: 2) mitigation measures were taken i
Page 81 and 82: 3.3 ConclusionsIn conclusion, the s
Page 83 and 84: ReferencesAlexander, D., 1997. The
Page 85: Guptasarma, D. 1996. Is the Seismic
Page 89 and 90: Annex I - Earthquake safe featuresT
Page 91 and 92: The Role of NGOs in Disaster Mitiga
Page 97 and 98: Annex 2 - Mason Interview ResultsSt
Page 99 and 100: 11. How to make such a course more
Page 101 and 102: sloped roof 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 1 2.78s
Page 103 and 104: 17. Do homeowners request earthquak
Page 105 and 106: light roof 1 0 1 2.78 0 0.00RCC 1 3
Page 107 and 108: 6. How long have you lived in the v
Page 109 and 110: 16. Do you have an emergency commun
Page 111 and 112: 26. What activities related to the
Page 113 and 114: 36. Would you prefer traditional ma
Page 115 and 116: Appendix IV - Breakdown of earthqua
Page 117: Appendix IV - Breakdown of earthqua
show all

A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India - Geological & Mining ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?