12.07.2015 Views

A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India - Geological & Mining ...

A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India - Geological & Mining ...

A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India - Geological & Mining ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Reponses for what features masons themselves consider to be most importantvary. Eight-eight percent of tra<strong>in</strong>ed masons consider column to be the mostimportant, fifty-three list band and thirty-seven list beam. Conversely, only elevenpercent of untra<strong>in</strong>ed masons list column and beam and eight percent list band.Although it is simply a construction material and not an earthquake-safe feature perse, twenty-eight percent of untra<strong>in</strong>ed masons consider RCC to be important. Itshould also be noted that thirty-three percent of untra<strong>in</strong>ed masons claimed to haveno idea as to what features were most important.3.1.1e Build<strong>in</strong>g trends/retrofitt<strong>in</strong>gBoth regions appear to be follow<strong>in</strong>g fashionable build<strong>in</strong>g trends <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the use ofRCC roofs, bricks and frame structures. Masons <strong>in</strong> <strong>Study</strong> Area A suggest that afterthe Uttarkashi and Chamoli earthquakes a large number of constructions were, andhave cont<strong>in</strong>ued to be built with modern materials, RCC (re<strong>in</strong>forced concrete),bricks, etc. Despite this shift <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g trends seventy-seven percent of tra<strong>in</strong>edmasons <strong>in</strong>dicate that earthquake-safe houses can be built with traditional materials(stone, mud, wood) and that retrofitt<strong>in</strong>g of build<strong>in</strong>gs is possible. While seventy-fivepercent of untra<strong>in</strong>ed masons agree that earthquake-safe constructions are possiblewith traditional materials only fourteen percent believe that retrofitt<strong>in</strong>g of build<strong>in</strong>g ispossible. Eighty-three percent declared that retrofitt<strong>in</strong>g is not possible at all. Aga<strong>in</strong>,retrofitt<strong>in</strong>g is a component of the workshop pedagogy and supports the suppositionthat tra<strong>in</strong>ees are reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>formation provided <strong>in</strong> the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g courses.It has been noted that although the technical knowledge for retrofitt<strong>in</strong>g exists with<strong>in</strong><strong>India</strong>, the actual implementation of such practices is not yet up to par (Paul, 2004).One of the ways this could be facilitated <strong>in</strong> through the development of more rigidpublic policy and stricter enforcement of build<strong>in</strong>g codes. Information has beenprovided by agencies such as the <strong>India</strong>n Bureau of standards on good eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>gpractices but are not mandatory. Therefore, it is the perceptions of the homeowneror builder that will ultimately determ<strong>in</strong>e how closely these recommendations areadhered to. While a number of government organizations are opt<strong>in</strong>g to adopt theseThe Role of NGOs <strong>in</strong> Disaster Mitigation and Response – A <strong>Case</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Uttarakhand</strong>, <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>India</strong> 46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!