12.07.2015 Views

A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India - Geological & Mining ...

A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India - Geological & Mining ...

A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India - Geological & Mining ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

practices, private constructions, especially at the village level tend to ignore thesefeatures. Increased education and dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>in</strong>formation is thereforenecessary to keep homeowners and masons alike <strong>in</strong>formed of practices.3.1.1f Monitor<strong>in</strong>gIn the Almora region, n<strong>in</strong>ety-two percent of untra<strong>in</strong>ed masons report that there isno monitor<strong>in</strong>g of build<strong>in</strong>g and construction practices. In Rudraprayag forty-sevenpercent of masons recall hav<strong>in</strong>g had their work monitored at some stage. It shouldbe noted that the overall quality of build<strong>in</strong>gs is better <strong>in</strong> the tra<strong>in</strong>ed region.However, responses were scattered and do not hold much merit as to who wasactually responsible for the monitor<strong>in</strong>g process and why. In the same token,<strong>in</strong>creased tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g not only of local masons but of the local community facilitatesparticipation <strong>in</strong> the monitor<strong>in</strong>g process by means of an enhanced understand<strong>in</strong>g of“best practices” for constructions and thereby better construction overall.3.1.1g Homeowner perceptionsWhen asked the reason<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d homeowners not opt<strong>in</strong>g for earthquake-safefeatures seventy-six percent of tra<strong>in</strong>ed masons suggest that this is attributed to: 1)poor economic condition (note: a common misconception is that earthquake-safefeatures are highly expensive) and 2) homeowners and community members notbe<strong>in</strong>g provided with adequate <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g earthquake-safe features andtheir costs. Among untra<strong>in</strong>ed masons, n<strong>in</strong>eteen percent suggested lack off<strong>in</strong>ances, thirty percent stated lack of knowledge, and twenty-two percent claimedto have no idea. Twenty-seven percent <strong>in</strong>dicate that there are no reasons at allbeh<strong>in</strong>d homeowners not us<strong>in</strong>g earthquake-safe features <strong>in</strong>sist<strong>in</strong>g that they do, <strong>in</strong>fact, already use earthquake features.3.1.1h Feedback on tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gs from <strong>Study</strong> Area AAn <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t to emerge from the study is that generally tra<strong>in</strong>ed masons aremore familiar with both frame structures and load-bear<strong>in</strong>g structures than untra<strong>in</strong>edmasons. A further dimension to this observation is discovered when compar<strong>in</strong>g PSIThe Role of NGOs <strong>in</strong> Disaster Mitigation and Response – A <strong>Case</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Uttarakhand</strong>, <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>India</strong> 47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!