A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India - Geological & Mining ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chopra, R. 1989. The Role of Voluntary Organizations. People’s Science Institute,Discussion Paper.Chopra, R., Kumar, R. & Dash, B., 2005, Impact Assessment of Masons Training –Results of a Preliminary Survey. People’s Science Institute impact assessment.Christoplos, I., Mitchell, J. and Liljelund, A. 2001. Re-framing Risk: The ChangingContext of Disaster Mitigation and Preparedness. Disasters, 25 (3): 185-198.Cronin, S.J., Gaylord, D.R., Charley, D., Alloway, B.V., Wallez, S., and Esau, J.W.2004a. Participatory methods of incorporating scientific with traditional knowledgefor volcanic hazard management on Ambae Island, Vanuatu. Bulletin forVolcanology, 66:652-668.Cronin, S.J., Petterson, M.G., Taylor, P.W. and Biliki, R., 2004b. Maximising Multi-Stakeholder Participation in Governemnt and Community Volcanic HazardManagement Programs, a Case Study from Savo, Solomon Island. NaturalHazards, 33:105-136.Cuny, F.C. 1983. Disasters and Development. Oxford University Press, London..Disaster Management and Mitigation Centre, 2007. Impact of Earthquake SafetyInitiatives in Uttarakhand (India). Disaster Mitigation and Management Center,Department of Disaster Management, Government of Uttarakhand, Dehra Dun.Disaster Management and Mitigation Center, 2007. NGO Coordination forEffective Disaster Management in Uttarakhand. Workshop report, 22-23 June,2007.Economic Commission for Latin America and the Carribean, 2003. Handbook forestimating the socio-economic and environmental effects of disasters. UnitedNations, ECLAC, and the World Bank.Foster, H.D., 1976. Assesing Disaster Magnitude: A Social Science Approach.Professional Geographer, 28(3): 241-7. seen in, Alexander, D., 1997. The Study ofNatural Disasters, 1977-1997: Some Refections on a Changing Field ofKnowledge. Disasters, 21 (4): 284-304.Gaur, V.K., 2001. Earthquake Hazard in the Himalya. In Disaster Management,eds. Joshi, A.P., Kumar, R. and Rawat, K. Rohini Printers and Publishers. pp.5-12.Gupta, D.D., 2006. Community Based Preparedness, Prevention and Mitigation:Sustainable Approaches. Issue 08, August 2006, Sangamam, Tntrc.org.Government of India, HomeAffairs, 2002. Disaster Management – A DevelopmentPerspective, an extract of the chapter in the Tenth Five Year Plan Document(2002-2007).The Role of NGOs in Disaster Mitigation and Response – A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India 77
Guptasarma, D. 1996. Is the Seismic Risk similar everywhere along the HimalayanCollision Belt. Himalayan Geology, Vol. 17, pp 1-9.Habitat for Humanity International Web site.http://www.habitat.org/disaster/mitigation_preparedness/default.aspx , viewed onAugust 14, 2007.Harroff-Tavel, M. 2003. Do wars ever end? The work of the InternationalCommittee of the Red Cross when the guns fall silent. IRRC September 2003, Vol.85, No. 851.Houghten, R. (2005). Tsunami Emergency Lessons Learned form Previous NaturalDisasters. Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance inHumanitarian Action Review Series. Lessons Learned Studies ALNAP, London.Humanitarian Policy Group (HPG), 2003: Humanitarian NGOs: Challenges andTrends. In: HPG Briefing, no. 12.Jennings, R. 2000. Participatory Development as a New Paradigm: The Transitionof Development Professionalism, Prepared for the “Community Based Reintigrationand Rehabilitation in Post-Conflict Settings” Conference Washington DCJoshi, A.P., Kumar, R. and Rawat, K., 2001. Disaster Management in theMountains. In Disaster Management, eds. Joshi, A.P., Kumar, R. and Rawat, K.Rohini Printers and Publishers. pp. 44-45.Khattri, K.N. 2004. A Perspective of Seismic Hazard and Risk in Northern India. InCoping with Natural Hazards: Indian Context, Orient Longman Private Limited. Pp49-58.Khattri, K.N., 2006. A need to review the current official seismic zoning map ofIndia. Current Science, v90, n5,, pp 634-636.Kumar, V. 2001. Now After Gujarat! What?. In Disaster Management, eds. Joshi,A.P., Kumar, R. and Rawat, K. Rohini Printers and Publishers. pp.13-17.La Trobe, S. and Venton, P., 2003. Natural Disaster Risk Reduction: The policyand practice of selected institutional donors. A Tearfund Research Project.Mahmood and Soni, 2006. Summer Training Report on Survey and Analysis ofImpact of Mason’s Training Programme Conducted by People’s Science Institute(PSI).Maskry, A., 1989. Disaster Mitigation: A community based approach. Oxford,Oxfam.The Role of NGOs in Disaster Mitigation and Response – A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India 78
Page 1 and 2:
The Role of Non GovernmentalOrganis
Page 3 and 4:
Table of contentsChapter 1 - Introd
Page 5 and 6:
List of figuresFigure 1.1: Study re
Page 7 and 8:
preparedness, and has potential to
Page 9 and 10:
This case study investigates the im
Page 11 and 12:
• What are homeowner perceptions
Page 13 and 14:
Seismic activity in this area is du
Page 15 and 16:
The study comprises two regions: St
Page 17 and 18:
1.4.1 - b Study Area B- Almora dist
Page 19 and 20:
etc. operational). The study involv
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 2 - Theoretical Orientation
Page 23 and 24:
2.1.2 VulnerabilityVulnerability is
Page 25 and 26:
of a disaster everyone knows how to
Page 27 and 28:
disaster management in the country,
Page 29 and 30:
Despite the apparent increased cons
Page 31 and 32:
2.3.1 Disaster Mitigation and Prepa
Page 33 and 34: save lives. This event marked a pri
Page 35 and 36: Systems technologies and education
Page 37 and 38: As suggested previously, there is a
Page 39 and 40: on the main agenda (Benson et al, 2
Page 41 and 42: Frame structureFramed structures ha
Page 43 and 44: The curriculum of the PSI workshops
Page 45 and 46: Figure 2.2a: Community based disast
Page 47 and 48: district irrespective of the fact t
Page 49 and 50: etrofitting, monitoring and homeown
Page 51 and 52: structures as an alarming forty-fiv
Page 53 and 54: Reponses for what features masons t
Page 55 and 56: trained masons in the Study Area A
Page 57 and 58: ecommended that a similar study be
Page 59 and 60: 3.1.2b Awareness and Dissemination
Page 61 and 62: It is interesting to note that when
Page 63 and 64: Community based disaster preparedne
Page 65 and 66: 3.1.3 - Section 3 Housing Impact As
Page 67 and 68: Load-bearing1.single steel rod in e
Page 69 and 70: The overall proportion of newly bui
Page 71 and 72: etween stirrups of 6-12 inches. Alt
Page 73 and 74: Table 3.7: Percentage of safe house
Page 75 and 76: 3.2 DiscussionThe discussion segmen
Page 77 and 78: In Study Area A the number of earth
Page 79 and 80: 2) mitigation measures were taken i
Page 81 and 82: 3.3 ConclusionsIn conclusion, the s
Page 83: ReferencesAlexander, D., 1997. The
Page 87 and 88: Telford, J. and Cosgrave, J., 2007.
Page 89 and 90: Annex I - Earthquake safe featuresT
Page 91 and 92: The Role of NGOs in Disaster Mitiga
Page 97 and 98: Annex 2 - Mason Interview ResultsSt
Page 99 and 100: 11. How to make such a course more
Page 101 and 102: sloped roof 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 1 2.78s
Page 103 and 104: 17. Do homeowners request earthquak
Page 105 and 106: light roof 1 0 1 2.78 0 0.00RCC 1 3
Page 107 and 108: 6. How long have you lived in the v
Page 109 and 110: 16. Do you have an emergency commun
Page 111 and 112: 26. What activities related to the
Page 113 and 114: 36. Would you prefer traditional ma
Page 115 and 116: Appendix IV - Breakdown of earthqua
Page 117: Appendix IV - Breakdown of earthqua
show all

A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India - Geological & Mining ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?