A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India - Geological & Mining ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix IV - Breakdown of earthquake safe featuresLoad bearing: Study Area A - Rudraprayag DistrictTrained Single steel rod inVillagemason? cornerPlinthbandLintelbandSmallopeningLightroofThroughstoneCornerstrengtheningAkhori TM Y Y u/c Y u/c n/a Y NAkhori TM/TM Y Y Y Y Y n/a N NAkhori TM Y Y Y Y Y Y Y NBhanaj OM N N Y u/c u/c Y Y NBhatwari OM column Y Y N Y n/a column NBhatwari OM column Y Y N Y n/a N NBhatwari TM Y Y Y Y Y Y Y NBhiri TM unknown Y N Y Y Y N NChanderNager OM Y Y Y N N n/a Y NDungri TM Y Y Y Y N n/a Y YJabri TM Y n/a Y Y Y n/a N NKandara TM Y Y Y Y N Y Y NKandara OM N n/a Y Y Y n/a Y YKeda Talla OM N N Y Y Y Y N NKeda Talla TM Y Y Y Y Y n/a Y NKeda Talla OM N N Y Y N Y Y NMukundi OM N N N Y Y Y N NSari OM N N N Y N Y Y NSari OM N N N N Y Y Y NTebris OM N n/a N Y Y Y N NTebris TM N Y Y N u/c Y N NSillbandThe Role of NGOs in Disaster Mitigation and Response – A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India 109
Appendix IV - Breakdown of earthquake safe featuresLoad bearing - Study Area B - Almora DistrictVillageMason Single steel rod in Plinth Lintel SmallThrough Corner SillLight rooforigin cornerband band openingstone strengthening bandChitai local n/a N N Y Y N Y NChitai local N n/a Y N Y n/a N. NChitai local N Y Y N Y n/a N NFalseema local n/a N Y N Y Y Y NFalseema local n/a n/a Y Y Y Y Y NJyoli local n/a n/a N N Y Y Y NMaatgo local n/a N Y N Y Y Y NManiagar local n/a N N Y Y Y Y NManiagra local N n/a N N Y n/a N NManiagra unknown N N N N Y Y Y NPaperSali local n/a N N Y Y Y Y NPaperSali local n/a N N Y N Y Y NShishral local N Y Y Y Y n/a N NThe Role of NGOs in Disaster Mitigation and Response – A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India 110
Page 1 and 2:
The Role of Non GovernmentalOrganis
Page 3 and 4:
Table of contentsChapter 1 - Introd
Page 5 and 6:
List of figuresFigure 1.1: Study re
Page 7 and 8:
preparedness, and has potential to
Page 9 and 10:
This case study investigates the im
Page 11 and 12:
• What are homeowner perceptions
Page 13 and 14:
Seismic activity in this area is du
Page 15 and 16:
The study comprises two regions: St
Page 17 and 18:
1.4.1 - b Study Area B- Almora dist
Page 19 and 20:
etc. operational). The study involv
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 2 - Theoretical Orientation
Page 23 and 24:
2.1.2 VulnerabilityVulnerability is
Page 25 and 26:
of a disaster everyone knows how to
Page 27 and 28:
disaster management in the country,
Page 29 and 30:
Despite the apparent increased cons
Page 31 and 32:
2.3.1 Disaster Mitigation and Prepa
Page 33 and 34:
save lives. This event marked a pri
Page 35 and 36:
Systems technologies and education
Page 37 and 38:
As suggested previously, there is a
Page 39 and 40:
on the main agenda (Benson et al, 2
Page 41 and 42:
Frame structureFramed structures ha
Page 43 and 44:
The curriculum of the PSI workshops
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 2.2a: Community based disast
Page 47 and 48:
district irrespective of the fact t
Page 49 and 50:
etrofitting, monitoring and homeown
Page 51 and 52:
structures as an alarming forty-fiv
Page 53 and 54:
Reponses for what features masons t
Page 55 and 56:
trained masons in the Study Area A
Page 57 and 58:
ecommended that a similar study be
Page 59 and 60:
3.1.2b Awareness and Dissemination
Page 61 and 62:
It is interesting to note that when
Page 63 and 64:
Community based disaster preparedne
Page 65 and 66: 3.1.3 - Section 3 Housing Impact As
Page 67 and 68: Load-bearing1.single steel rod in e
Page 69 and 70: The overall proportion of newly bui
Page 71 and 72: etween stirrups of 6-12 inches. Alt
Page 73 and 74: Table 3.7: Percentage of safe house
Page 75 and 76: 3.2 DiscussionThe discussion segmen
Page 77 and 78: In Study Area A the number of earth
Page 79 and 80: 2) mitigation measures were taken i
Page 81 and 82: 3.3 ConclusionsIn conclusion, the s
Page 83 and 84: ReferencesAlexander, D., 1997. The
Page 85 and 86: Guptasarma, D. 1996. Is the Seismic
Page 87 and 88: Telford, J. and Cosgrave, J., 2007.
Page 89 and 90: Annex I - Earthquake safe featuresT
Page 91 and 92: The Role of NGOs in Disaster Mitiga
Page 97 and 98: Annex 2 - Mason Interview ResultsSt
Page 99 and 100: 11. How to make such a course more
Page 101 and 102: sloped roof 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 1 2.78s
Page 103 and 104: 17. Do homeowners request earthquak
Page 105 and 106: light roof 1 0 1 2.78 0 0.00RCC 1 3
Page 107 and 108: 6. How long have you lived in the v
Page 109 and 110: 16. Do you have an emergency commun
Page 111 and 112: 26. What activities related to the
Page 113 and 114: 36. Would you prefer traditional ma
Page 115: Appendix IV - Breakdown of earthqua
show all

A Case Study in Uttarakhand, Northern India - Geological & Mining ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?