12.07.2015 Views

awej 5 no.4 full issue 2014

awej 5 no.4 full issue 2014

awej 5 no.4 full issue 2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AWEJ Volume.5 Number.3, <strong>2014</strong>The Effects of Writing Intervention ProgramSamaranayake & GabaynoContextually-developed materialsSince the main objective of our pilot study was to investigate the effects of a process genreapproach in developing writing proficiency that will help students to perform better in anexamination setting, the researchers developed extra materials because the writing taskssuggested in the prescribed textbook- Ready to write: perfecting paragraphs fourth Ed, byBlanchard and Root (2010) which is used in level three were not adequate to provide studentswith ample opportunities in writing practice. Both psychological theories of skill acquisition andsecond language acquisition theories suggest that considerable practice is required to automatizea skill (DeKeyser, 2007). Moreover, practice in writing improves performance in writing.Therefore, given the theoretical underpinnings and the research evidence from studies conductedinto skill acquisition by a number of researchers (Anderson, Fincham, & Douglass, 1997), theextra writing activities the researchers developed and used with the study group were consistentwith Ortega‟s (2007) model for the design of activities. In his model, he proposes that thefollowing two principles should be considered when designing activities for EFL learners topractice in class:1. Practice should be interactive.2. Practice should be meaningful.When applied to writing, Ortega‟s model implies that teachers should design interactiveactivities in which the writing teacher exposes his students to various writing strategies such asoutlining, drafting, or free writing (Lavelle & Bushrow, 2007; Spack, 1988). The topics fordeveloping modules were selected from the prescribed textbook-Ready to write: perfectingparagraphs by Blanchard and Root (2010). Based on the delivery plan <strong>issue</strong>d by the EnglishLanguage Center in our institution for level 3 writing, the researchers prepared extra tasks for thetopics stated below:1. Getting organized: The key to good writing.2. Understanding paragraphs.3. Expressing your opinion.4. Comparing and contrasting.5. Writing personal and business letters.6. Description and comparison: Bar graphs7. Analyzing causes and effects8. Writing personal and business lettersIn designing academic writing tasks, the researchers followed a process genre approach byincluding the stages such as pre-writing, composing, pre-reading and revising, peer-editing andteacher feedback. Moreover, the researchers maintained the principles stated above such asproviding context to the learner in a meaningful way, providing forms and functions relevant tothe activities, and making the content of the activity related to different kinds of writing such ascomparing and contrasting, expressing an opinion, analyzing data and personal and businessletters.MethodologyAs noted above, given the writing difficulties encountered by the foundation level studentsstudying in level three at Shinas College of Technology, a pilot study was conducted toinvestigate the effects teaching materials for instruction of writing in and EFL context, using theProcess genre approach. In this study, a quantitative research framework was used because theresearchers needed a research design that would enable them to detect the effects of a specificArab World English JournalISSN: 2229-9327www.<strong>awej</strong>.org138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!