12.07.2015 Views

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

chapter 5Aristotle on melancholy1 introductionIn a number of his writings Aristotle discusses a type of people he calls ‘themelancholics’ (hoi melancholikoi), without ever giving a definition of melancholy;indeed he does not even mention the term melancholia. 1 He onlymentions, in passing, some typical features of a melancholic, sometimesadding a short psychological or physiological explanation, yet without relatingthese features to each other or to an underlying physiological theory.There is just one chapter (30.1)oftheProblemata physica (Pr.), a collectionof knowledge attributed to Aristotle, that contains a rather extensive discussionof melancholy. However, it is unlikely that the form in which thiscollection has come down to us dates back to Aristotle. 2 Recent scholarshiphas attributed the theory in this chapter to Theophrastus rather thanAristotle; according to Diogenes Laertius (5.44), Theophrastus wrote a treatise‘On Melancholy’ (Peri melancholias) <strong>and</strong> the chapter in the Problematais thought to be a summary or a revised version of this (lost) text. 3So far no attempt has been made to describe Aristotle’s concept of melancholyas based on his undisputed works, <strong>and</strong> to compare it to the theorypresented in Pr. 30.1. 4 Yet such an attempt could be useful, both becauseThis chapter was first published in German in Mnemosyne 43 (1990) 33–72.1 Literature on Aristotle’s views on melancholy: Angelino & Salvaneschi (1982); Boyancé(1936) 185–94;Croissant (1932); Flashar (1956) 43ff.; Flashar (1962) 711ff.; Flashar (1966) 60–72; García Gual (1984)41–50; Gravel (1982) 1, 129–45; S. W. Jackson (1986) 31–3; Klibansky, Panowsky <strong>and</strong> Saxl (1964) 15–40[<strong>and</strong> (1990) 55–91]; Müri (1953) 21–38; Pigeaud (1978) 23–31; Pigeaud (1981a) 122–38; Pigeaud (1984)501–10; Pigeaud (1988a); Simon (1978) 228–37; Tellenbach (1961) 1–15 [<strong>and</strong> Rütten (1992); Roussel(1988)].2 See on this subject the pioneering work by Flashar (1962) 303ff.; however, Marenghi (1966) [<strong>and</strong> Louis(1991–4) vol. iii] consider Aristotle to be the author of the Problemata.3 Müri (1953) 31; Klibansky et al. (1964) 36–41; Flashar (1962) 711–14; Flashar (1966) 61 [<strong>and</strong> Sharples(1995) 5–6]; on the reasons for this attribution see n. 91 below.4 Aristotle’s remarks are briefly discussed by Müri (1953) 38; Flashar (1966) 60; Flashar (1962) 712–13;Klibansky et al. (1964) 33–6; Croissant (1932) 35–8. On the influence of the theory of Pr. 30.1 seeFlashar (1962) 715–17 <strong>and</strong> Klibansky et al. (1964).139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!