12.07.2015 Views

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

84 Hippocratic Corpus <strong>and</strong> Diocles of Carystusall, a question of elementary physics or pharmacology), but this does notcontribute anything to our underst<strong>and</strong>ing of why honey produces certaindietetic effects. On the level of its nature <strong>and</strong> with regard to the effect itproduces, a foodstuff ‘resembles’ () a genuine undemonstrable startingpoint– although it is not a starting-point in the absolute sense: the words‘in some way’ serve the purpose of qualifying the resemblance that existsbetween a genuine starting-point <strong>and</strong> a foodstuff which, from a certainpoint of view, behaves like a starting-point. To say it with some exaggeration(which goes beyond what is in the text): there is a causal ‘gap’ between thenature of a foodstuff as being causally responsible for certain dietetic effectson the one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the nature of the foodstuff as being the result of acertain sum of elements or qualities.In section 9 Diocles states additional criticism. Since no subject of ‘makemistakes’ () is specified, it seems that he is still referringto the same group as in section 8 (but see below). These people, he says,miss the truth (note the similarity to the wording at the end of section 7),because their explanations are ill-founded. ‘Accept’ () istobetaken in the sense of ‘postulate’, ‘take as a starting-point’. 22 It is not quiteclear whether ‘things that are not known’ () should be takenin the sense of ‘invisibles’ (the ), namely things unknown to humanperception 23 (which, of course, would please those who read the fragmentas an anticipation of Empiricism) or in the sense of ‘not known to them’,in which case Diocles means something like ‘they do not know what theyare talking about’. 24 The second objection is obvious: disputed things donot serve as an appropriate starting-point; apart from being wrong perhaps,they are unconvincing. The third objection of ‘implausibility’ introducesthe notion of persuasiveness of the doctor’s statements – an element whichis also reflected in section 11 in the words ‘more reliable’ () <strong>and</strong>which is familiar from the Hippocratic writings. 25In sections 10–11 Diocles summarises his criticism <strong>and</strong> states his ownalternative. It is important to note the use of ‘rather’ (), <strong>and</strong>to see to what exactly the habit of putting more trust in the results oflong-term experience is said to be preferable: the ill-founded <strong>and</strong> undue22 Cf. Aristotle, Mete. 357 b 23–4: (‘letus discuss this adopting the same starting-point as we have adopted before’) <strong>and</strong> Pol. 1290 b 22–3: (‘And because there are more [sc. forms of constitution] than those mentioned, let us discuss whatthey are <strong>and</strong> why they are different, adopting as starting-point the one we have mentioned earlier’).For other linguistic resemblances to Aristotle see n. 42 below.23 On Ancient <strong>Medicine</strong> 1.3 (p. 119,5 Jouanna, 1.572 L.): (‘the things thatare invisible <strong>and</strong> difficult to know’). For Diocles’ views on ‘invisibles’ see frs. 177 <strong>and</strong> 56b.24 In view of the use of in section 11, the latter is perhaps more likely.25 Cf. Prognostic 1 (2.110 L.) <strong>and</strong> Langholf (1996).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!