12.07.2015 Views

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 <strong>Medicine</strong> <strong>and</strong> Philosophy in <strong>Classical</strong> Antiquityaccessible to a wider group of scholars <strong>and</strong> students. An almost exclusivefocus on medical ideas <strong>and</strong> theories has given way to a consideration ofthe relation between medical ‘science’ <strong>and</strong> its environment – be it social,political, economic, or cultural <strong>and</strong> religious. Indeed ‘science’ itself is nowunderstood as just one of a variety of human cultural expressions, <strong>and</strong> thedistinction between ‘science’ <strong>and</strong> ‘pseudo-science’ has been ab<strong>and</strong>oned ashistorically unfruitful. And medicine – or ‘healing’, or ‘attitudes <strong>and</strong> actionswith regard to health <strong>and</strong> sickness’, or whatever name one prefersin order to define the subject – is no longer regarded as the intellectualproperty of a small elite of Greek doctors <strong>and</strong> scientists. There is now amuch wider definition of what ‘ancient medicine’ actually involves, partlyinspired by the social <strong>and</strong> cultural history of medicine, the study of medicalanthropology <strong>and</strong> the study of healthcare systems in a variety of cultures<strong>and</strong> societies. The focus of medical history is on the question of how a society<strong>and</strong> its individuals respond to pathological phenomena such as disease,pain, death, how it ‘constructs’ these phenomena <strong>and</strong> how it contextualisesthem, what it recognises as pathological in the first place, what it labels asa disease or aberration, as an epidemic disease, as mental illness, <strong>and</strong> so on.How do such responses translate in social, cultural <strong>and</strong> institutional terms:how is a ‘healthcare system’ organised? What status do the practitionersor ‘providers’ of treatment enjoy? How do they arrive at their views, theories<strong>and</strong> practices? How do they communicate these to their colleagues<strong>and</strong> wider audiences, <strong>and</strong> what rhetorical <strong>and</strong> argumentative techniques dothey use in order to persuade their colleagues <strong>and</strong> their customers of thepreferability of their own approach as opposed to that of their rivals? Howis authority established <strong>and</strong> maintained, <strong>and</strong> how are claims to competencejustified? The answers to these questions tell us something about the widersystem of moral, social <strong>and</strong> cultural values of a society, <strong>and</strong> as such theyare of interest also to those whose motivation to engage in the subject isnot primarily medical. As the comparative history of medicine <strong>and</strong> sciencehas shown, societies react to these phenomena in different ways, <strong>and</strong> it isinteresting <strong>and</strong> illuminating to compare similarities <strong>and</strong> differences in thesereactions, since they often reflect deeper differences in social <strong>and</strong> culturalvalues. 6From this perspective, the study of ancient medicine now starts from thebasic observation that in the classical world, health <strong>and</strong> disease were mattersof major concern which affected everyone <strong>and</strong> had a profound effect on theway people lived, what they ate <strong>and</strong> drank, how they organised their private6 See the work of G. E. R. Lloyd, especially his (1996a), (2002) <strong>and</strong> (2003).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!