12.07.2015 Views

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Aristotle on melancholy 151For people constantly feel pleasure in their youth because they are growing; conversely,melancholics by nature constantly need to be cured , for the ‘mixture’ of their bodies keeps them in a constant state of stimulation <strong>and</strong> they are always subjectto intense desires According to Aristotle the pain is driven out by pleasure, once it has gainedsufficient strength, <strong>and</strong> therefore these people are undisciplined <strong>and</strong> bad(akolastoi kai phauloi) in the way they act.This is again a context in which the influence of the body on people’smoral behaviour is discussed (hence the remark about lack of discipline).Aristotle speaks about people who even perceive the normal state as painfuldue to their nature (dia tēn phusin), their physiological constitution. 43 Apparently,melancholics serve as an example for this group: they constantlyrequire cures by nature, that is, in their normal state. They might be said to bepermanently ill, 44 for their bodies are permanently ‘bitten’ (daknomenon)asa result of their ‘mixture’ (krasis). The word krasis, which plays an importantpart in Greek medicine <strong>and</strong> physiology, 45 clearly refers to a physiologicalstate. As Aristotle makes no mention of a mixture of humours anywhereelse, but does mention a particular mixture of heat <strong>and</strong> cold as the basis fora healthy physical constitution, 46 it is appropriate to think of a mixture ofqualities. In this theory, melancholics are characterised by a mixture of heat<strong>and</strong> cold (either too cold or too hot) that is permanently out of balance,something which Aristotle clearly regards as a sign of disease. Thus this passageconfirms the remark in Somn. vig. 457 a 29ff., as quoted above; it alsobecomes clear that the difference between constitution <strong>and</strong> disease, 47 whichis problematic in any case, fails because of the nature of the Aristotelianconcept of melancholy: the melancholic is, so to say, constitutionallyill. 4843 This explains Aristotle’s parenthetic remark about the testimony of the phusiologoi (see Dirlmeier(1956) 506).44 See the use of euiatotera in Eth. Nic. 1152 a 27.45 See den Dulk (1934) 67–95 <strong>and</strong> Tracy (1969) passim (in particular 35–8; 167–72; 175–6).46 Ph. 246 b 4–5: ‘the virtues of the body, such as health <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>someness, we posit in a mixture <strong>and</strong>balance of hot <strong>and</strong> cold’ on this see Tracy (1969)161–2.Cf.Pr. 954 a 15: ‘the melancholic humour is a mixture of hot <strong>and</strong> cold, for from these two thenature (of the body) is constituted’ On this question see also den Dulk (1934) 75f.47 See Dittmer (1940) 76–80; <strong>and</strong> Müri (1953) 30 n. 11.48 See the remark made by Klibansky et al. (1964) 30: ‘The natural melancholic, however, even whenperfectly well, possessed a quite special “ethos”, which, however it chose to manifest itself, madehim fundamentally <strong>and</strong> permanently different from “ordinary” men; he was, as it were, normallyabnormal.’

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!